IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/apstra/339862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

USE OF METHODS AND TOOLS (STRATEGY, PLANNING, TRANSPARENCY, ERP, DEVELOPMENT) FOR AN EFFECTIVE SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE A case study of SMEs in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County in Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Nouar, Dalila
  • Popovics, Péter

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises form the engine of the Hungarian economy, both in terms of their number and their employment rate. Therefore, the efficient operation of this sector is in the interest of many economic actors. However, experience shows that today’s SME sector still needs to develop in many ways to become efficient. This study aimed to analyze whether SMEs use the necessary methods and tools to be efficient. Planning and the development of strategy are very important methods and tools for efficient and organized work, as it defines and clarifies the direction taken by an enterprise. However, the survey and the in-depth interview showed that they are not necessarily considered important for the participating SME leaders. According to the interview, one of the reasons is that SME leaders have a better understanding of everyday tasks and their implementation than the managers of large companies. Furthermore, in most cases, the SME leader is personally involved in everyday work. This provides the advantage of having the opportunity to fully understand the enterprise, thus managing, and developing it more effectively, as he or she can intervene more flexibly, faster, and more accurately if necessary. However, due to the small size of the organization, the manager also must perform the tasks of several functions (marketing, management, finance, etc.), which require multidisciplinary knowledge and skill. In SMEs, due to their specificities, it is difficult to apply best practices in large enterprises in both management and various functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nouar, Dalila & Popovics, Péter, 2022. "USE OF METHODS AND TOOLS (STRATEGY, PLANNING, TRANSPARENCY, ERP, DEVELOPMENT) FOR AN EFFECTIVE SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE A case study of SMEs in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County in Hungary," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 16(2), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:apstra:339862
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339862/files/Nouar.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thune, Stanley S. & House, Robert J., 1970. "Where long-range planning pays off Findings of a survey of formal, informal planners," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 81-87, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Imran Hunjra & Nuzhat Shamim & Babar Khalid, 2014. "Impact of Strategic Planning on the Financial Performance of Small and Medium Banks in Islamabad," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 3(2), pages 96-130, June.
    2. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    3. Gruber, Marc, 2007. "Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 782-807, November.
    4. Hakan Aslan & Burcak Vatansever, 2018. "Efficiency of Knowledge Inflow Structures: The Mediation Effect of Task Environment Analysis," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 7(4), pages 30-43, October.
    5. Fawcett, Stanley E. & Calantone, Roger & Smith, Sheldon R., 1997. "Delivery capability and firm performance in international operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 191-204, September.
    6. Lopes, Miguel Vieira & Ross, R. Brent, 2013. "A Comparative Analysis of Strategic Planning Practices in Michigan Agribusiness Firms: 1992 vs. 2012," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, September.
    7. Rodolfo M. Nayga & Lukman M. Baga, 1995. "Economic reforms and firm level strategic planning," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(6), pages 565-572.
    8. Lopes, Miguel Vieira, 2012. "A Comparative Analysis of Strategic Management Practices in Michigan Agribusiness Firms: 1992 vs. 2012," Graduate Research Master's Degree Plan B Papers 142014, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    9. Armstrong, J. Scott, 1983. "Strategic Planning and Forecasting Fundamentals," MPRA Paper 81682, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. McManus, Ginette & Saint-Pierre, Jacques & Domonkos, John, 1995. "Formal strategic planning, informedness and firm performance: An empirical investigation," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 47-63.
    11. Christine A. Kabui & Vincent N. Machuki & John K. Yabs & James M. Njihia, 2018. "Strategic Planning Process Intensity and Formality Impact on the Performance of Accredited Universities in Kenya," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(9), pages 153-153, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:apstra:339862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.apstract.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.