IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/334089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the volume of seafood waste generation, utilization and management system from selected seafood processing companies in Ghana: A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Asiamah, Ebenezer
  • Oduro-Yeboah, Charlotte
  • Mboom, Frank Peget
  • Atter, Amy
  • Idun-Acquah, Nancy Nelly
  • Nkansah, Jessica

Abstract

Seafood waste has gained attention globally due to its increasing demand and negative impact on the environment. Survey work was conducted because Ghana has a significant number of commercial seafood processing industries but documentation on seafood waste is limited. The objective of this survey was to gain an insight into the volume of seafood waste generation, utilization and management system in seafood processing companies. Specifically, the study was to identify bottlenecks in the reuse of waste from seafood processing companies, quantify the seafood waste and determine the composition of the seafood waste generated. This study evaluated seafood waste from ten seafood processing companies situated in Tema, Effutu, Takoradi and Accra Metropolis in Ghana. Production and Quality Assurance managers from on-shore seafood processing companies were interviewed using a semi structured interview schedule (SSIS). These seafood processing companies have been in existence for between one to forty years. The highest proportion (40%) of the companies have been in existence for six to ten years. The companies which were in operation for a period of twenty to twenty-five years accounted for 20%. Most (80%) of these processing companies processed prawns, octopus, lobsters, grouper, catfish, whereas a minority (20%) processed tuna seafood. A majority (80%) of the surveyed processing companies did not process the waste generated. The remaining percentage occupied a production volume ranging from 10-50 tons of raw fish production. A large portion of the waste generated was from grouper (60%) with the least being tuna (11%). Survey results revealed that the companies did not process their seafood waste because of the unavailability of processing equipment and lack of knowledge on the seafood waste value-added products. Another challenge confronting seafood waste management was the absence of management policy to regulate it. It can be concluded that the 60% of the surveyed companies generated seafood waste and there is a need for steps to be taken to reduce it. The study revealed that there were no laws in Ghana that controlled the reuse of seafood waste. It is recommended that a holistic seafood waste reduction approach must be established between actors in the fishing and seafood processing sector. This study could be a driving tool to improve the seafood waste management system in Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Asiamah, Ebenezer & Oduro-Yeboah, Charlotte & Mboom, Frank Peget & Atter, Amy & Idun-Acquah, Nancy Nelly & Nkansah, Jessica, 2022. "Assessment of the volume of seafood waste generation, utilization and management system from selected seafood processing companies in Ghana: A case study," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(07).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:334089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/334089/files/Asiamah21745.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yahyaee, R. & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G., 2013. "Waste fish oil biodiesel as a source of renewable fuel in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 312-319.
    2. United Nations, 2016. "The Sustainable Development Goals 2016," Working Papers id:11456, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Rivera-González & David Bolonio & Luis F. Mazadiego & Robert Valencia-Chapi, 2019. "Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand Forecast (2018–2040): A LEAP Model Application towards a Sustainable Power Generation System in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Yang, Hongbo & Lupi, Frank & Zhang, Jindong & Liu, Jianguo, 2020. "Hidden cost of conservation: A demonstration using losses from human-wildlife conflicts under a payments for ecosystem services program," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Suresh Chaudhary & Yukuan Wang & Amod Mani Dixit & Narendra Raj Khanal & Pei Xu & Bin Fu & Kun Yan & Qin Liu & Yafeng Lu & Ming Li, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Degradation of Abandoned Farmland and Associated Eco-Environmental Risks in the High Mountains of the Nepalese Himalayas," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Janna Niens & Lisa Richter-Beuschel & Tobias C. Stubbe & Susanne Bögeholz, 2021. "Procedural Knowledge of Primary School Teachers in Madagascar for Teaching and Learning towards Land-Use- and Health-Related Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-36, August.
    5. Hope Osayantin Aifuwa, 2020. "Sustainability Reporting And Firm Performance In Developing Climes: A Review Of Literature," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 9(1), pages 9-29.
    6. Pankaj Tiwari, 2021. "Electronic banking adoption in Ethiopia: an empirical investigation," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(9), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Mota, Francisco A.S. & Costa Filho, J.T. & Barreto, G.A., 2019. "The Nile tilapia viscera oil extraction for biodiesel production in Brazil: An economic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Hulse, Merran, 2016. "Economic Partnership Agreements: implications for regional governance and EU-ACP development cooperation," Briefing Papers 12/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    9. Priniti Panday, 2020. "Women’s Empowerment and the Well-being of Children in Nepal," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 36(2), pages 129-154, June.
    10. Katelin Opferkuch & Anna M. Walker & Erik Roos Lindgreen & Sandra Caeiro & Roberta Salomone & Tomás B. Ramos, 2023. "Towards a framework for corporate disclosure of circular economy: Company perspectives and recommendations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2457-2474, September.
    11. Theresa Gehringer, 2020. "Corporate Foundations as Partnership Brokers in Supporting the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Zaharin, M.S.M. & Abdullah, N.R. & Najafi, G. & Sharudin, H. & Yusaf, T., 2017. "Effects of physicochemical properties of biodiesel fuel blends with alcohol on diesel engine performance and exhaust emissions: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 475-493.
    13. Zhanerke Bolatova & Kamshat Tussupova & Berik Toleubekov & Kanat Sukhanberdiyev & Kulyash Sharapatova & Martin Stafström, 2021. "Challenges of Access to WASH in Schools in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Case Study from Rural Central Kazakhstan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Shruti Lahoti & Ashish Lahoti & Rajendra Kumar Joshi & Osamu Saito, 2020. "Vegetation Structure, Species Composition, and Carbon Sink Potential of Urban Green Spaces in Nagpur City, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Vassilis Detsis & Helen Briassoulis & Constantinos Kosmas, 2017. "The Socio-Ecological Dynamics of Human Responses in a Land Degradation-Affected Region: The Messara Valley (Crete, Greece)," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Stephen R. Buzdugan & Heinz Tüselmann, . "Making the most of FDI for development: “new” industrial policy and FDI deepening for industrial upgrading," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    17. Ingrid Espegren Dalsmo & Kristin Haraldstad & Berit Johannessen & Olav Johannes Hovland & Mercy G. Chiduo & Liv Fegran, 2021. "“Now I Feel That I Can Achieve Something”: Young Tanzanian Women’s Experiences of Empowerment by Participating in Health Promotion Campaigns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-10, August.
    18. Stafford, Richard & Jones, Peter JS Dr, 2019. "Viewpoint – Ocean Plastic Pollution: a convenient but distracting truth?," MarXiv fu5dp, Center for Open Science.
    19. Kammerlander, Andreas & Schulze, Günther G., 2023. "Local economic growth and infant mortality," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    20. Peng, Donna & Poudineh, Rahmatallah, 2017. "An appraisal of investment vehicles in the Tanzania's electricity sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 51-68.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:334089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.