IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/334025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing adoption, innovation of new technology and decision-making by small-scale resource-constrained farmers: The perspective of farmers in lower Gweru, Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Masere, Tirivashe Philip
  • Worth,Steve Hugh

Abstract

A study was conducted in Lower Gweru Communal area of Zimbabwe to determine factors affecting small-scale resource-constrained farmers’ technology adoption and innovation processes. Specific objectives included determining circumstances when farmers consider learning about and adopting new technologies; documenting challenges faced by farmers in technology adoption; and determining the kind of support farmers require in adopting technologies or innovating. Multistage stratified random sampling was used to select a study sample of 256 farmers who participated in focus group discussions (FGDs). Additionally, semi-structured interviews (SSIs) with 200 farmers, selected from within the 256 FGD participants, were conducted to corroborate data collected in FGDs and participant observation. The study found that farmers were ready to learn and adopt new technologies when proposed technologies were (i) cheaper to acquire and use than their current technologies, (ii) easier and simpler to use, (iii) reduced labor requirements, and (iv) increased crop yields and/or animal productivity. Specifically, the study found high adoption rates of new technologies with traits similar to the farmers’ traditional practices such as conservation agriculture (with a 90% adoption rate) and thermal composts (with a 78% adoption rate). In terms of challenges, farmers were hampered mainly by lack of capital to acquire new technologies and lack of access to information, credit facilities and markets. In terms of support, in addition to capital and issues of access, farmers preferred to be actively involved in defining problems and developing solutions, technologies and innovations. Rather than being mere beneficiaries of new technologies developed by others, they want to be included in processes such as field-based participatory learning extension and innovation projects. In keeping with their self-perception as businessmen and women, perhaps most significantly, this study has reaffirmed that small-scale farmers, despite their educational limitations, their age, their constrained circumstances, and their risk profiles – are conscious and deliberate decision-makers. They are rational in their approach to adoption of technology, but are dominated by factors of cost, impact on income, and, of greatest influence, risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Masere, Tirivashe Philip & Worth,Steve Hugh, 2022. "Factors influencing adoption, innovation of new technology and decision-making by small-scale resource-constrained farmers: The perspective of farmers in lower Gweru, Zimbabwe," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(03).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:334025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/334025/files/Masere20960.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cook, Brian R. & Satizábal, Paula & Curnow, Jayne, 2021. "Humanising agricultural extension: A review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Pindiriri, Carren, 2018. "Breaking the Traditional Trap: Assessing Drivers of Modern Technology Adoption by Smallholder Farmers in Hurungwe District, Zimbabwe," Monographs: Applied Economics, AgEcon Search, number 302435, November.
    3. Machiweyi Kunzekweguta & Karl M. Rich & Michael C. Lyne, 2017. "Factors affecting adoption and intensity of conservation agriculture techniques applied by smallholders in Masvingo district, Zimbabwe," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 330-346, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejsi Qorri & Enikő Pergéné Szabó & János Felföldi & Krisztián Kovács, 2024. "The Role of Human Resource Management in Agricultural Labor-Saving Technologies: An Integrative Review and Science Mapping," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farris, Jarrad & Maredia, Mywish K. & Mason, Nicole M. & Ortega, David L., 2024. "Farmer personality and community-based extension effectiveness in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Mustafa Hakkı Aydoğdu & Mehmet Cançelik & Mehmet Reşit Sevinç & Mehmet Ali Çullu & Kasım Yenigün & Nihat Küçük & Bahri Karlı & Şevket Ökten & Uğur Beyazgül & Hatice Parlakçı Doğan & Gönül Sevinç & Zel, 2021. "Are You Happy to Be a Farmer? Understanding Indicators Related to Agricultural Production and Influencing Factors: GAP-Şanlıurfa, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Sankhulani, Linda, 2021. "Impact evaluation of conservation agriculture on smallholder farmers’ livelihood in Zambia and Tanzania," Research Theses 334762, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    4. Satoshi Shimizutani & Shimpei Taguchi & Eiji Yamada & Hiroyuki Yamada, 2021. "The Impact of "Grow to Sell" Agricultural Extension on Smallholder Horticulture Farmers: Evidence from a Market- Oriented Approach in Kenya," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2021-020, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    5. Yang Guo & Meiling Cui & Zhigang Xu, 2023. "Spatial Characteristics of Transfer Plots and Conservation Tillage Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Survey of Four Provinces in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Dan Qiao & Ningjie Li & Li Cao & Desheng Zhang & Yanan Zheng & Tao Xu, 2022. "How Agricultural Extension Services Improve Farmers’ Organic Fertilizer Use in China? The Perspective of Neighborhood Effect and Ecological Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Djuraeva, Mukhayyo & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Kuhn, Lena & Glauben, Thomas, 2023. "The impact of agricultural extension type and form on technical efficiency under transition: An empirical assessment of wheat production in Uzbekistan," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 203-221.
    8. Baiyegunhi, L.J.S. & Hassan, M.B. & Danso-Abbeam, G. & Ortmann, G.F., 2019. "Diffusion and adoption of Integrated Striga Management (ISM) technologies among smallholder maize farmers in rural northern Nigeria," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 109-115.
    9. Pavitra Dhamija, 2020. "Economic Development and South Africa: 25 Years Analysis (1994 to 2019)," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 88(3), pages 298-322, September.
    10. Felipe Gallardo-López & Fernando Landini & Mario Alejandro Hernández-Chontal, 2022. "The Productive Orientation of Rural Extensionists in the Regions of Mexico: A Key Element for Agroecological Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Nathan Einbinder & Helda Morales & Mateo Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho & Bruce G. Ferguson & Miriam Aldasoro & Ronald Nigh, 2022. "Agroecology from the ground up: a critical analysis of sustainable soil management in the highlands of Guatemala," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 979-996, September.
    12. Faustina Obeng Adomaa & Sietze Vellema & Maja Slingerland & Richard Asare, 2022. "The adoption problem is a matter of fit: tracing the travel of pruning practices from research to farm in Ghana’s cocoa sector," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 921-935, September.
    13. McGill, David, 2022. "Innovations for extension: a case study from Pakistan," 2022: Celebrating Agriculture for Development - Outcomes, impacts and the way ahead, 15-16 August 2022 333330, Crawford Fund.
    14. Sakketa, Tekalign Gutu & Herrmann, Raoul & Nkonde, Chewe & Lukonde, Mwelwa & Brüntrup, Michael, 2022. "The effects of a private-sector-driven smallholder support programme on productivity, market participation and food and nutrition security: Evidence of a nucleus-outgrower scheme from Zambia," IDOS Discussion Papers 19/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    15. Prince B. Annor & Simeon Kaitibie & Michael C. Lyne, 2023. "Heterogeneous impacts of GlobalGAP adoption on net income in small‐scale pineapple farming in Ghana: Does farm size matter?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1199-1216, October.
    16. Sussy Munialo & Alexandros Gasparatos & Ndiko Ludidi & Ali Elnaeim Elbasheir Ali & Eden Keyster & Musa Oyebowale Akanbi & Mohammad Naushad Emmambux, 2024. "Systematic Review of the Agro-Ecological, Nutritional, and Medicinal Properties of the Neglected and Underutilized Plant Species Tylosema fassoglense," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.
    17. Obvious Mapiye & Godswill Makombe & Annelin Molotsi & Kennedy Dzama & Cletos Mapiye, 2021. "Towards a Revolutionized Agricultural Extension System for the Sustainability of Smallholder Livestock Production in Developing Countries: The Potential Role of ICTs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Katarzyna Zawalińska & Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou & Katalin Balazs & Michael Böhm & Mihai Chitea & Violeta Florian & Mihaela Fratila & Piotr Gradziuk & Stuart Henderson & Katherine Irvine & Vasilia Kon, 2022. "Advancing the Contributions of European Stakeholders in Farming Systems to Transitions to Agroecology," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 50-63, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:334025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.