IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/61996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What will South Africa’s new Cooperatives Act do for small producers? An analysis of three case studies in KwaZulu-Natal

Author

Listed:
  • Nganya, P.
  • Lyne, Michael C.
  • Ferrer, Stuart R.D.

Abstract

The new Cooperatives Act 14 of 2005 was promulgated in August 2005 to promote the development of sustainable cooperatives in South Africa and their use as a vehicle to develop small enterprises. This paper uses the new institutional economics (NIE) to highlight problems created by the Act. Case studies were done of three producer groups in KwaZulu-Natal that formally registered as cooperatives after August 2005. It is clear that the cooperative model was adopted because it was seen as a precondition for government support. All of these cooperatives displayed symptoms of institutional problems and two of them had mitigated these problems by shedding their poorest members and creating their own rules to reward investors with capital gains. The first of these ‘solutions’ is not consistent with the objective of pro-poor economic development; the second is at odds with the new Act. It is recommended that the new Act should be amended so that cooperatives can at least issue tradable equity shares that offer benefits proportional to shareholding. In addition, it is recommended that the same level of start-up support should be made available to all producer groups that formally register their business, regardless of the business model chosen, and that member empowerment should be an essential requirement for registration and public funding.

Suggested Citation

  • Nganya, P. & Lyne, Michael C. & Ferrer, Stuart R.D., 2010. "What will South Africa’s new Cooperatives Act do for small producers? An analysis of three case studies in KwaZulu-Natal," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 49(1), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:61996
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.61996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/61996/files/3.%20Nganwa_%20Lyne%20_%20Ferrer.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.61996?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly A. Zeuli, 1999. "New Risk-Management Strategies for Agricultural Cooperatives," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(5), pages 1234-1239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sparks, Garreth D. & Ortmann, Gerald F. & Lyne, Michael C., 2011. "PR - An Analysis Of Cooperative Biodiesel Production By Smallholders In Kwazulu-natal, South Africa (p444-462)," 18th Congress, Methven, New Zealand, 2011 345597, International Farm Management Association.
    2. Huma Neupane & Krishna P. Paudel & Mandeep Adhikari & Qinying He, 2022. "Impact of cooperative membership on production efficiency of smallholder goat farmers in Nepal," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 337-356, June.
    3. Julia Amend & Patrick Troglauer & Tobias Guggenberger & Nils Urbach & Martin Weibelzahl, 2024. "Facilitating cooperation of smallholders in developing countries: design principles for a cooperative-oriented decentralized autonomous organization," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-31, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Baourakis & Michael Doumpos & Nikos Kalogeras & Constantin Zopounidis, 2002. "Multicriteria analysis and assessment of financial viability of agribusinesses: The case of marketing co-operatives and juice-producing companies," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 543-558.
    2. Garnevska, Elena & Liu, Guozhong & Shadbolt, Nicola M., 2011. "Factors for Successful Development of Farmer cooperatives in Northwest China," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Unterschultz, James R. & Gurung, Rajendra Kumar, 2002. "New Generation Co-Operatives (Ngc) As A Model For Value-Added Agricultural Processing In Alberta: Applications To Factors Affecting Choice Of Pricing And Payment Practices By Traditional Marketing And," Project Report Series 24045, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    4. Stéphanie Barral, 2023. "Risk management in the Common Agricultural Policy: the promises of data and finance in the face of increasing hazards," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 67-76, March.
    5. Anderson, Jock R., 2003. "Risk in rural development: challenges for managers and policy makers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 75(2-3), pages 161-197.
    6. Pincheira, Pablo & Zeuli, Kimberly A., 2005. "Cooperative and Area Yield Insurance: A Theoretical Analysis," 2005 Annual Meeting, November 8-9 31822, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    7. Skees, Jerry & Varangis, Panos & Larson, Donald & Siegel, Paul, 2002. "Can financial markets be tapped to help poor people cope with weather risks ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2812, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:61996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.