IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/347860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic value of quality restrictions on the wheat industry in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Naledzani, Zwiafhela
  • Chaminuka, Petronella
  • Nhundu, Kenneth
  • Machethe, Charles L.
  • Liebenberg, Frikkie

Abstract

Wheat is South Africa’s second most important grain crop and is produced in winter rainfall, summer rainfall, and irrigation regions. Despite being a net importer of wheat, the country has stringent wheat quality requirements as per the Agricultural Products Act (Act No. 119 of 1990). This paper investigates the effects of the quality requirements in different regions and the wheat industry as whole. Forward regression and benefit–cost analysis were applied to data on wheat area planted, seed adoption rates, prices, and cultivar performance from 1999 to 2016. A total of 31 527 observations from winter, summer and irrigation regions were used, each accounting for 4563, 8824 and 18 140 cases respectively. Forty-nine cultivars were used for trials during this period. Results show that stringent quality requirements have resulted in losses of approximately 39 000 tons from 1999 to 2016. The benefits of pursuing the prevailing quality standards amounted to R400 million while the costs amounted to R514 million, far exceeding the benefits. The resulting benefit–cost ratio was 0.78, implying that for every rand invested in breeding for quality alone, 22 cents is lost. It can be concluded that government intervention through quality standards has led to more losses than gains. In addition, investments made towards quality improvement alone have not been recovered due to the high standards. There are therefore cogent reasons to consider relaxing the quality standards to allow for higher wheat outputs, thus unlocking growth in local wheat production.

Suggested Citation

  • Naledzani, Zwiafhela & Chaminuka, Petronella & Nhundu, Kenneth & Machethe, Charles L. & Liebenberg, Frikkie, 2019. "Economic value of quality restrictions on the wheat industry in South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 58(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:347860
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/347860/files/Economic%20value%20of%20quality%20restrictions%20on%20the%20wheat%20industry%20in%20South%20Africa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.347860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jens‐Peter Loy & Thore Holm & Carsten Steinhagen & Thomas Glauben, 2015. "Seasonal Quality Premiums for Wheat: A Case Study for Northern Germany," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 63-75, January.
    2. Dlamini, Thula & Nalley, Lanier & Tsiboe, Francis & Barkley, Andrew & Shew, Aaron, 2017. "The Economic Impact Of The South African Agricultural Research Council'S Dry Beans Breeding Program," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 232-250, May.
    3. Stiegert, Kyle W. & Blanc, Jean-Pierre, 1997. "Japanese Demand For Wheat Protein Quantity And Quality," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Barkley, Andrew P. & Nalley, Lawton Lanier & Crespi, John M., 2008. "The Impact of the CIMMYT Wheat Breeding Program on Mexican Wheat Producers and Consumers: An Economic Welfare Analysis," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6931, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stiegert, Kyle W. & Wang, Shinn-Shyr, 2003. "Imperfect Competition And Strategic Trade Theory: What Have We Learned," Working Papers 14589, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    2. Fengxia Dong & Thomas L. Marsh & Kyle W. Stiegert, 2006. "State Trading Enterprises in a Differentiated Product Environment: The Case of Global Malting Barley Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(1), pages 90-103.
    3. Lavoie, Nathalie, 2002. "Price Discrimination in the Context of Vertical Differentiation: An Application to Canadian Wheat Exports," Research Reports 25210, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    4. Suleyman KARAMAN & Feyza YAVUZ, 2014. "Hedonic price analysis of the quality characteristics of Anatolian hard red wheat," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(10), pages 469-478.
    5. Wachenheim, Cheryl J. & Nganje, William E. & Kaitibie, Simeon & Johnston, Gretchen, 2005. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Breads Marketed as "Low-Carbohydrate"," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19428, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Balzer, Brian & Stiegert, Kyle W., 1999. "The European Union-United States Wheat Gluten Policy Dispute," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Parcell, Joseph L. & Stiegert, Kyle W., 1998. "Competition For U.S. Hard Wheat Characteristics," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Elisabeth Vollmer & Daniel Hermann & Oliver Musshoff, 2019. "The disposition effect in farmers’ selling behavior: an experimental investigation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 177-189, March.
    9. Holzer, Patrick & Loy, Jens-Peter, 2016. "Messung Des Vermarktungserfolges Bei Marktfruchtbaubetrieben: Wie Groß Sind Die Unterschiede?," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244893, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    10. Roberts, Shane & Brooks, Kathleen & Nogueira, Lia & Walters, Cory G., 2022. "The role of quality characteristics in pricing hard red winter wheat," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Bucheli, Janic & Visse, Margot & Herrera, Juan & Häner, Lilia Levy & Tack, Jesse & Finger, Robert, 2022. "Precipitation causes quality losses of economic relevance in wheat production," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321208, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    12. Asadi, Hormoz & Zamanian, Gholamreza & Tash, Mohammad Nabi Shahiki & Ghorbani, Mohammad & Kamali, Mohammad Reza Jalal, 2017. "An Economic Analysis of Wheat Breeding Programs for Some Iranian Irrigated Bread Wheat Varieties," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 1), January.
    13. Goodwin, Barry K. & Smith, Vincent H., 2009. "Harvest-Time Protein Shocks and Price Adjustment in U.S. Wheat Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Lavoie, Nathalie, 2001. "Price Discrimination In The Context Of Vertical Differentiation: A Modeling Approach For Wheat Exports," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20603, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Fengxia Dong & Thomas L. Marsh & Kyle W. Stiegert, 2003. "State Trading Enterprises in a Differentiated Environment: The Case of Global Malting Barley Markets," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 03-wp350, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    16. Schmitz, Troy G. & Wahl, Thomas I., 1998. "A System-Wide Approach For Analyzing Japanese Wheat Import Allocation Decisions," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20780, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Parcell, Joseph L. & Stiegert, Kyle W., 2001. "Japanese Demand For Wheat Characteristics: A Market Share Approach," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36103, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    18. Anton Bekkerman, 2021. "Quality forecasts: Predicting when and how much markets value higher‐protein wheat," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(4), pages 465-490, December.
    19. Peng Peng & Zhigang Xu, 2022. "Price expectations, risk aversion, and choice of sales methods for large‐scale farmers under incomplete market conditions," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 1012-1031, October.
    20. Stiegert, Kyle W. & Peng, Hsing Ming, 1998. "Liberalization Of The Taiwan Wheat Milling Industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(2), pages 1-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:347860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.