IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v49y2017i02p232-250_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Impact Of The South African Agricultural Research Council'S Dry Beans Breeding Program

Author

Listed:
  • DLAMINI, THULA
  • NALLEY, LANIER
  • TSIBOE, FRANCIS
  • BARKLEY, ANDREW
  • SHEW, AARON

Abstract

This study estimates the dry bean yield increase in South Africa that is attributable to genetic improvements through the Agricultural Research Council's (ARC) bean breeding program. Using 32 test plots across South Africa from 1982 to 2014, results indicate that ARC breeding increased average yields by 11.65 kg/ha annually, for a cumulative 43.28% increase. These yield increases were not at the expense of yield variance, an important measure of food security. These findings indicate that the returns on investment are relatively high (an estimated 5.67:1 benefit-cost ratio) and can lead to greater food security though increased and stabilized bean yields.

Suggested Citation

  • Dlamini, Thula & Nalley, Lanier & Tsiboe, Francis & Barkley, Andrew & Shew, Aaron, 2017. "The Economic Impact Of The South African Agricultural Research Council'S Dry Beans Breeding Program," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 232-250, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:49:y:2017:i:02:p:232-250_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070816000468/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naledzani, Zwiafhela & Chaminuka, Petronella & Nhundu, Kenneth & Machethe, Charles L. & Liebenberg, Frikkie, 2019. "Economic value of quality restrictions on the wheat industry in South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 58(1), January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:49:y:2017:i:02:p:232-250_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.