IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aergaa/26416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production, Consumption and Welfare Implications of Trade Liberalisation: The Case of Greek Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Stoforos, Chrysostomos E.

Abstract

The main facts lying behind this paper are related to the current issues regarding EU policies; such as the accession of a number of Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) in the EU and the Doha round of the World Trade Organisation. The adopted quantitative methodology aims to estimate the expected trends in Greek agriculture following a substantial reduction in the level of protection over the 1999-2008 period. Two scenarios are examined: a baseline that simulates continuation of present agricultural policies, and one that assumes trade liberalisation. Trade liberalization has as an immediate negative effect on production, while a positive effect is true for demand. Welfare analysis results suggest a significant negative effect in producer surplus, but an overall positive trend for the net welfare effect in the case of the trade liberalisation scenario. Hence, from the efficiency point of view, the reallocation of resources through trade liberalisation is beneficial, if proper strategies are adopted to avoid additional costs due to market imperfections.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoforos, Chrysostomos E., 2003. "Production, Consumption and Welfare Implications of Trade Liberalisation: The Case of Greek Agriculture," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aergaa:26416
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.26416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/26416/files/04010005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.26416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Guyomard & L. P. Mahé & C. Tavéra & T. Trochet, 1991. "Technical Change And Ec‐Us Agricultural Trade Liberalisation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 119-137, May.
    2. Rakhal Sarker & Karl Meilke & Michael Hoy, 1993. "The Political Economv of Svstematic Government Intervention in Agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 41(3), pages 289-309, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gadanakis, Yiorgos & Baourakis, George & Clapan, Carmen, 2007. "Measuring the impacts of distortions in the European Union cotton sector: a partial equilibrium analysis using the ATPSM model framework," Working Papers 7285, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chantal Le Mouël, 1999. "Élargissement à l'Est et négociations commerciales internationales : quelle marge de manœuvre pour la PAC ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 329(1), pages 35-54.
    2. Herve Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe & Terry L. Roe, 1994. "L'agriculture au GATT et la nouvelle PAC : la fin d'une exception ?," Post-Print hal-01593896, HAL.
    3. Sean A. Cahill, 1997. "Calculating The Rate Of Decoupling For Crops Under Cap/Oilseeds Reform," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 349-378, January.
    4. Guyomard, Herve & Le Mouel, Chantal, 2003. "The New Banana Import Regime in the European Union: A Quantitative Assessment," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 4(2), pages 1-19.
    5. Clas Eriksson, 2011. "Home bias in preferences and the political economics of agricultural protection," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 92(1), pages 5-23.
    6. Y. Surry, 1993. "The Constant Difference Of Elasticities Function With Applications To The Ec Animal Feed Sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 110-125, January.
    7. C. Stoforos & G. Mergos, 2004. "Modelling EU tobacco policy reform," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(19), pages 2167-2175.
    8. Yves Léon & Maurice Quinqu, 1993. "Perspectives d'évolution de la valeur ajoutée des régions françaises et réforme de la PAC," Post-Print hal-01937078, HAL.
    9. Vink, N., 1992. "Expanding The Playing Field: South Africa, Southern Africa And The Role Of The Agricultural Economist," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(4), December.
    10. Conforti, Piero, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Main Partial Equilibrium Models," Working Papers 14806, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    11. Hervé Guyomard & Nadine Herrard & Chantal Le Mouël & Yves Le Roux & Thierry Trochet, 1996. "L'accord agricole de l'Uruguay Round et la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune : éléments d'analyse et de prospective," Working Papers hal-01594019, HAL.
    12. Hervé Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe, 1993. "La réforme de la PAC (texte de mai 1992) évaluation à l'aide du modèle MISS," Working Papers hal-01594128, HAL.
    13. Lubbe, W. F. & Groenewald, J. A., 1992. "Market Reform In The Red Meat Industry," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(4), December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aergaa:26416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etagrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.