IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aareaj/117795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax reform and the natural resource industries

Author

Listed:
  • Freebairn, John W.

Abstract

Tax reforms passed by Federal Parliament in June 1999 include rationalising indirect taxes, a tax mix change, and a smaller fiscal surplus. The impact or first‐round effects on the natural resource industries indicate large gains. Important second‐round reactions, particularly a real currency appreciation, erode most of, and in some cases more than all of, the first‐round gains. A complete assessment requires the use of general equilibrium models.

Suggested Citation

  • Freebairn, John W., 2000. "Tax reform and the natural resource industries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:117795
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.117795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117795/files/1467-8489.00104.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.117795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Auerbach, Alan J, 1997. "The Future of Fundamental Tax Reform," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 143-146, May.
    2. Engen, Eric M & Gale, William G, 1997. "Consumption Taxes and Saving: The Role of Uncertainty in Tax Reform," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 114-119, May.
    3. David Johnson, 1997. "Taxation in Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 30(4), pages 448-466, December.
    4. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen T. Rimmer, 1999. "The Government's Tax Package: Further Analysis based on the MONASH Model," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-131, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo Serra, 1998. "El Sistema Impositivo y su Efecto en el Funcionamiento de la Economía: Una Revisión de la Literatura," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 39, Central Bank of Chile.
    2. Pablo Serra, 1998. "Evaluación del Sistema Tributario Chileno y Propuesta de Reforma," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 40, Central Bank of Chile.
    3. Auerbach, Alan J., 2006. "Tax Reform in the 21st Century," Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper Series qt444479wh, Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics.
    4. Alan Auerbach & Michael P. Devereux & Helen Simpson, 2007. "Taxing Corporate Income," CESifo Working Paper Series 2139, CESifo.
    5. Auerbach, Alan J. & Devereux, Michael P., 2010. "Consumption and cash-flow taxes in an International setting," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58056, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Auerbach, Alan J., 2006. "The Choice between Income and Consumption Taxes: A Primer," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt9q85f6qz, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    7. Sijbren Cnossen, 2010. "Three VAT Studies," CPB Special Publication 90.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Boss, Alfred, 2011. "Steuerpolitik für Deutschland: Ein Reformvorschlag und Schritte zu seiner Verwirklichung," Kiel Working Papers 1707, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Auerbach, Alan J., 2006. "The Choice between Income and Consumption Taxes: A Primer," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt9q85f6qz, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    10. Smyth, Russell, 2014. "Myths and Misconceptions in the Tax Mix Debate," MPRA Paper 59271, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Thomas Rapp & Nicolas Aubert, 2011. "Bank Employee Incentives and Stock Purchase Plans Participation," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 40(3), pages 185-203, December.
    12. Brian Parmenter, 2004. "Distinguished Fellow of the Economic Society of Australia, 2003: Peter Dixon," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 80(249), pages 141-144, June.
    13. Sijbren Cnossen, 2010. "Three VAT Studies," CPB Special Publication 90, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    14. Productivity Commission, 2001. "Impact of Commonwealth indirect taxes on exporters," Finance 0107003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Dixon, Peter B. & Rimmer, Maureen T., 2013. "Validation in Computable General Equilibrium Modeling," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1271-1330, Elsevier.
    16. Pablo Serra & Daniel Hojman, 2000. "A Note on the Optimality of the Cash Flow Tax," Documentos de Trabajo 83, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    17. Rui Pan & Dao‐Zhi Zeng, 2023. "The effects of trade liberalization on tax avoidance," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(4), pages 898-932, December.
    18. Wittwer, Glyn, 2000. "The Sensitivity Of Wine Industry Outcomes To Model Assumptions In Gst Scenarios," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123742, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    19. Rajesh Chadha, 2009. "Moving to Goods and Services Tax in India : Impact on India’s Growth and International Trade," Trade Working Papers 23071, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    20. Alan J. Auerbach, 2005. "Comments on John B. Shoven and John Whalley’s, “Irving Fisher's Spendings (Consumption) Tax in Retrospect”," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 237-243, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:117795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.