IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/vxxviy2019i4(621)p139-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analyses model of the Romanian privately managed pension system

Author

Listed:
  • Dragoș Alexandru HAȘEGAN

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The Romanian privately managed pension system (Pillar II) is a system financed though the allocation towards the privately managed pension funds of a certain percentage from the contributions due by the participants to the public social insurance system. The main advantage of the system is represented by the fact that the amounts received by the pension funds will be better used, being invested by the pension management companies, which will ensure that he amounts saved by the participants will increase on the long run. Pillar II is compulsory for employees under 35 years old and optional for those between 35 and 45 years old, at the moment of enrolment. By contributing month after month until retirement, assets will be accumulated and will be multiplied through investments, ensuring a supplementary pension beside the public system one. The pension management companies are only authorized companies, in that way the investments will be made in a professional environment, towards profitable areas, ensuring the accumulated assets profitability. The number of participants at Pillar II is increasing since the inception of the system and this trend will continue at least on medium term. From the start of the system to the moment of the first pension payments, there were and there will only be a small number of participants, which received or will receive the assets accumulated in their accounts. Until the first participants enrolled will reach the legal retirement age, the amounts in their accounts will continue to grow, while efficiently invested, will offer a guarantee for a higher supplementary pension.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragoș Alexandru HAȘEGAN, 2019. "An analyses model of the Romanian privately managed pension system," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(621), W), pages 139-148, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxvi:y:2019:i:4(621):p:139-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1426.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=1426&rid=137
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Barr & Peter Diamond, 2009. "Reforming pensions: Principles, analytical errors and policy directions," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(2), pages 5-29, April.
    2. Mitchell A. Orenstein, 2011. "Pension privatization in crisis: Death or rebirth of a global policy trend?," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 65-80, July.
    3. Stewart, Fiona, 2014. "Proving incentives for long-term investment by pension funds -- the use of outcome-based benchmarks," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6885, The World Bank.
    4. Mirela Cristea & Eleftherios Thalassinos, 2016. "Private Pension Plans: An Important Component of the Financial Market," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 110-115.
    5. Bauer, R.M.M.J. & Cremers, K.J.M. & Frehen, R.G.P., 2010. "Pension Fund Performance and Costs: Small is Beautiful," MPRA Paper 23556, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:agr:journl:v:4(621):y:2019:i:4(621):p:139-148 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. William Price & John Ashcroft & Michael Hafeman, 2016. "Outcome Based Assessments for Private Pensions," World Bank Publications - Reports 25194, The World Bank Group.
    3. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Shahnawaz Khan & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    4. Pierpaolo Giannoccolo & Silvia Platoni, 2023. "Temporary versus permanent disability: A dynamic incentives model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(4), pages 698-721, November.
    5. Rob Euwals & Annemiek van Vuren & Daniel van Vuuren, 2011. "The impact of reforms on labour market exit probabilities," CPB Discussion Paper 179, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    6. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Lisa Schopohl, 2020. "State Pension Funds and Corporate Social Responsibility: Do Beneficiaries’ Political Values Influence Funds’ Investment Decisions?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 489-516, September.
    7. V. Bouvatier & S. Rigot, 2013. "Pension funds' allocations to hedge funds: an empirical analysis of US and Canadian defined benefit plans," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(26), pages 3701-3710, September.
    8. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2019. "Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 472-499, August.
    9. Nikolay Tikhomirov & Tatiana Tikhomirova & Eldar Khamitov & Vladimir Ponomarev, 2017. "Models of Assessment of the Influnce of Insurance Assets Securitization on Stability of Mutual Insurance Societies," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 321-333.
    10. Geri, Milva, 2022. "Pension arrangements and economic thinking: unreal assumptions and false predictions in the case of Argentina," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    11. Gustavo Ferro, 2021. "¿Qué aprendimos de las reformas previsionales argentinas de 1994 y de 2008?," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 810, Universidad del CEMA.
    12. Ishay Wolf & Lorena Caridad y Lopez del Rio, 2021. "The Expectation for Pension Insurance in Funded Schemes: Theoretical Model and Global Implementation," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, September.
    13. Martínez Preece Marissa R. & Venegas Martínez Francisco, 2014. "Análisis del riesgo de mercado de los fondos de pensión en México Un enfoque con modelos autorregresivos," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 59(3), pages 165-195, julio-sep.
    14. Alexander M. Danzer & Lennard Zyska, 2023. "Pensions and Fertility: Microeconomic Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 126-165, May.
    15. Carrera, Leandro N. & Angelaki, Marina, 2020. "The diversity and causality of pension reform pathways: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102554, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. J.A. Bikker, 2013. "Is there an optimal pension fund size? A scale-economy analysis of administrative and investment costs," Working Papers 13-06, Utrecht School of Economics.
    17. repec:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:4:p:238-254 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Aglietta, Michel & Brière, Marie & Rigot, Sandra & Signori, Ombretta, 2012. "Rehabilitating the role of active management for pension funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2565-2574.
    19. Broeders, Dirk & de Haan, Leo, 2020. "Benchmark selection and performance," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 511-531, October.
    20. D. Lamasharipov, 2018. "Risk Management and Prospects for the Transition of Penitentiary System: The Case of Kazakhstan," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 488-495.
    21. Sheila Rose Darmaraj & Suresh Narayanan, 2019. "The Long-Term Financial Sustainability of the Civil Service Pension Scheme in Malaysia," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 18(1), pages 155-178, Winter/Sp.
    22. Nivorozhkina L.I. & Abazieva K.G. & Dolbina S.V., 2019. "Impact of Contemporary Pension Reforms on Households’ Welfare," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 2), pages 258-269.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxvi:y:2019:i:4(621):p:139-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.