IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v1(638)y2024i1(638)p169-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic efficiency of waste management policies

Author

Listed:
  • Rareș-Mihai NIȚU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

Waste management represents a new trend in the economic market. On the one hand, it is important to protect the natural environment in which everyday society carries out its activities, which is obviously a concern of the European Union. On the other hand, waste management processes represent a new business, a new opportunity to achieve efficiency processes in the use of products consumed as waste in the local market. In both cases, it is important to delimit the conceptual framework in order to recognize, on the one hand, the need for concrete and up-to-date directives that establish strict rules for waste management and, on the other hand, to allow economic operators to comply with current legislation without causing harm even without the possibility of an alternative. The aim of the present work is to analyze the nature of this area of activity and to delineate the importance, the need and the necessary measures to create an economically efficient framework that promotes the sustainable way of doing business. On the other hand, the need for awareness is equally important, because the decisive factor in maintaining normality is the individual in society. In order to comply with all the rules imposed by current legislation, it is necessary to establish clear legal rules prescribing certain behavior. Instruments such as the guarantee fee for the packaging of end-user products or the transfer of responsibility are crucial factors for good management of waste management processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rareș-Mihai NIȚU, 2024. "The economic efficiency of waste management policies," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(638), S), pages 169-178, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:1(638):y:2024:i:1(638):p:169-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1729.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=1729&rid=154
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Hoornweg & Perinaz Bhada-Tata & Chris Kennedy, 2013. "Environment: Waste production must peak this century," Nature, Nature, vol. 502(7473), pages 615-617, October.
    2. Lawrence H. Goulder & Ian W. H. Parry, 2008. "Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 152-174, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Antoniou & Roland Strausz, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Taxation and Feed-in Tariffs," CESifo Working Paper Series 4788, CESifo.
    2. Elisabetta Cornago & Renaud Foucart, 2014. "Instrument Choice and Cost Uncertainty in the Electricity Market," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2014-13, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Jaraitė, Jūratė & Di Maria, Corrado, 2012. "Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: A case study of power generation in the EU," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1557-1568.
    4. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    5. Jonathan M. Lee, 2015. "The Impact of Heterogeneous NOx Regulations on Distributed Electricity Generation in U.S. Manufacturing," Working Papers 15-12, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    6. Xinkuo Xu & Liyan Han, 2017. "Diverse Effects of Consumer Credit on Household Carbon Emissions at Quantiles: Evidence from Urban China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Mbéa Bell & Sylvain Dessy, 2017. "Market Power and Instrument Choice in Climate Policy," Cahiers de recherche 1704, Centre de recherche sur les risques, les enjeux économiques, et les politiques publiques.
    8. Veith, Stefan & Werner, Jörg R. & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2009. "Capital market response to emission rights returns: Evidence from the European power sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 605-613, July.
    9. Heimvik, Arild & Amundsen, Eirik S., 2021. "Prices vs. percentages: Use of tradable green certificates as an instrument of greenhouse gas mitigation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    11. Christopher Jeffords, 2014. "Preference-directed regulation when ethical environmental policy choices are formed with limited information," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 573-606, March.
    12. Douenne, Thomas & Fabre, Adrien, 2020. "French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Driss Ezzine-de-Blas & Céline Dutilly & José-Alberto Lara-Pulido & Gwenolé Le Velly & Alejando Guevara-Sanginés, 2016. "Payments for Environmental Services in a Policymix: Spatial and Temporal Articulation in Mexico," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Sharma, Bhasha & Goswami, Yagyadatta & Sharma, Shreya & Shekhar, Shashank, 2021. "Inherent roadmap of conversion of plastic waste into energy and its life cycle assessment: A frontrunner compendium," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Dietrich Earnhart & Sarah Jacobson & Yusuke Kuwayama & Richard T. Woodward, 2023. "Discretionary Exemptions from Environmental Regulation: Flexibility for Good or for Ill," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(2), pages 203-221.
    16. Brita Bye & Kevin R. Kaushal & Orvika Rosnes & Karen Turner & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2023. "The Road to a Low Emission Society: Costs of Interacting Climate Regulations," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(3), pages 565-603, November.
    17. Simon Porcher, 2013. "Regulation and ICT capital input: empirical evidence from 10 OECD countries," Chapters, in: Mehmet Ugur (ed.), Governance, Regulation and Innovation, chapter 7, pages 182-196, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Zhang, Zibin & Yang, Wenxin & Ye, Jianliang, 2021. "Why sulfur dioxide emissions decline significantly from coal-fired power plants in China? Evidence from the desulfurated electricity pricing premium program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    19. Lehmann, Paul, 2010. "Combining emissions trading and emissions taxes in a multi-objective world," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2010, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    20. Benjamin Jones & Michael Keen & Jon Strand, 2013. "Fiscal implications of climate change," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(1), pages 29-70, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:1(638):y:2024:i:1(638):p:169-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.