IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jetimm/v1y2021i1p31-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Media Use of the 20 Largest Listed Austrian Companies – Effective Networking Tool or Mere Showcase Function?

Author

Listed:
  • Peter SCHNECKENLEITNER

    (University of Applied Sciences Kufstein Tyrol)

Abstract

According to Grunig (2009), social media offer companies the potential to communicate with their various stakeholders in a two-way and interactive, symmetrical and dialogical manner. However, there is the possibility that communicators use new media in the same way as old media and that the potential of interactivity is not exploited through a one-sided use of the channels. Zerfaß & Piwinger (2014) also express this fear and emphasize that corporate social media channels often simply fulfill a showcase function. So how does this play out in reality? This study uses a four-stage model to examine the intensity of interactions on individual posts. A distinction is made between low interaction (reactions/likes/shares), increased interaction (comments), dialog (users communicate with each other or the company communicates with users) and digital network structure (the company enters into a communicative exchange with users and the users communicate with each other). The object of the study was 1,993 posts of the 20 largest listed Austrian companies (ATX companies) on the social media platforms Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Twitter. The study period was three months. On all four social media platforms, all forms of interaction could be identified. However, the main functions of social media channels, enabling dialogue and networking, could only be observed to a small extent.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter SCHNECKENLEITNER, 2021. "The Social Media Use of the 20 Largest Listed Austrian Companies – Effective Networking Tool or Mere Showcase Function?," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 31-39, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:31-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2021/ETIMM_V01_2021_25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    2. Hudson, Simon & Huang, Li & Roth, Martin S. & Madden, Thomas J., 2016. "The influence of social media interactions on consumer–brand relationships: A three-country study of brand perceptions and marketing behaviors," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 27-41.
    3. Christian Fieseler & Matthes Fleck & Miriam Meckel, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Blogosphere," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 599-614, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kizgin, Hatice & Jamal, Ahmad & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Rana, Nripendra P., 2021. "The impact of online vs. offline acculturation on purchase intentions: A multigroup analysis of the role of education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 724-735.
    2. Itziar Castelló & Michael Etter & Finn Årup Nielsen, 2016. "Strategies of Legitimacy Through Social Media: The Networked Strategy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 402-432, May.
    3. Fraccastoro, Sara & Gabrielsson, Mika & Pullins, Ellen Bolman, 2021. "The integrated use of social media, digital, and traditional communication tools in the B2B sales process of international SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    4. Shakeel ul Rehman & Rafia Gulzar & Wajeeha Aslam, 2022. "Developing the Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) through Social Media (SM): The Modern Marketing Communication Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    5. Ziad Abdelmoety & Spiros Gounaris, 2015. "Exporting B2B Solutions: The Impact and Contribution of Using Social Media," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 1(1), pages 23-40, January.
    6. Santiago, Joanna & Borges-Tiago, Maria Teresa & Tiago, Flávio, 2022. "Is firm-generated content a lost cause?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 945-953.
    7. Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & McLean, Graeme, 2018. "Examining online social brand engagement: A social presence theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 10-21.
    8. Monica Fait & Dirk Meissner & Gian Luca Gregori & Filippo Monge & Valentina Cillo, 2022. "To act or to react? The role of responsiveness in corporate social performance disclosure in preventing plastic pollution in the travel and tourism sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2065-2082, November.
    9. Roma, Paolo & Aloini, Davide, 2019. "How does brand-related user-generated content differ across social media? Evidence reloaded," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 322-339.
    10. Zarnadze Giorgi, 2020. "Social interactions impact on product and service development," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 324-332, July.
    11. Chi-Horng Liao, 2022. "Applying the DEMATEL Method to Evaluate Social Media Criteria in Promoting Sustainable Health Behavior—A Case Study of Vegetarian Diet Promotion by a Non-Profit Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Bento, Marisa & Martinez, Luisa M. & Martinez, Luis F., 2018. "Brand engagement and search for brands on social media: Comparing Generations X and Y in Portugal," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 234-241.
    13. Park, Minjung & Im, Hyunjoo & Kim, Hye-Young, 2020. "“You are too friendly!” The negative effects of social media marketing on value perceptions of luxury fashion brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 529-542.
    14. Paniagua, Jordi & Sapena, Juan, 2014. "Business performance and social media: Love or hate?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 719-728.
    15. Kirtika Deo & Abhnil Amtesh Prasad, 2020. "Evidence of Climate Change Engagement Behaviour on a Facebook Fan-Based Page," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Alice Mazzucchelli & Roberto Chierici & Angelo Di Gregorio & Claudio Chiacchierini, 2021. "Is Facebook an effective tool to access foreign markets? Evidence from international export performance of fashion firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1107-1144, December.
    17. Melanie Schreiner & Thomas Fischer & Rene Riedl, 2021. "Impact of content characteristics and emotion on behavioral engagement in social media: literature review and research agenda," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 329-345, June.
    18. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Flemming, Jan, 2021. "Social media resources and capabilities as strategic determinants of social media performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 549-571.
    19. Wiese, Melanie & Martínez-Climent, Carla & Botella-Carrubi, Dolores, 2020. "A framework for Facebook advertising effectiveness: A behavioral perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 76-87.
    20. Cynthia Stohl & Michael Etter & Scott Banghart & DaJung Woo, 2017. "Social Media Policies: Implications for Contemporary Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 413-436, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social media; interaction; network structure; dialogue; ATX company.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:31-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.