IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v20y2018i49p631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance of Biotech Companies in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ion Anghel

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marian Siminica

    (University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania)

  • Mirela Cristea

    (University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania)

  • Mirela Sichigea

    (University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania)

  • Gra?iela Georgiana Noja

    (West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The paper’s aim is to analyse the interdependency between the intellectual capital and the financial performance of biotechnological (biotech) companies in the pharmaceutical industry. The analysis was performed for 24 biotech companies in this branch considered during 2002-2014, based on several indicators available on the Thomson Reuters database. The financial performance was measured through the return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE) and the debt-to-equity ratio (DE). In order to capture the intellectual capital, the focus was on a designing a new indicator, proposed by the authors, respectively the efficiency of research and development expenditures (ECD), along with another proxy, previously attested by the literature and reflected through the market to-book ratio (MTB). The research methodology resides on applying the correlation method, robust regression, and structural equations modelling (SEM). The results reveal a significant negative relationship between ROA, ROE and MTB, which contradicts the literature and suggests that, for this particular type of companies, MTB isn’t relevant to express the intellectual capital. MTB was positively correlated with DE. When we used the ECD, the results attested a strongly positive and significant relation with ROA and ROE, and a negative one with DE. Therefore, the applied tests confirm ECD as the most suitable indicator to appreciate the intellectual capital for the biotech companies in the pharmaceutical industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ion Anghel & Marian Siminica & Mirela Cristea & Mirela Sichigea & Gra?iela Georgiana Noja, 2018. "Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance of Biotech Companies in the Pharmaceutical Industry," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 631-631, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2746.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ion Anghel, 2008. "Intellectual Capital and Intangible Assets Analysis and Valuation," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 3(3(520)), pages 75-84, March.
    2. Bojan Krstić & Ljiljana Bonić, 2016. "EIC: A New Tool for Intellectual Capital Performance Measurement," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(6), pages 723-741.
    3. Shahid Amin & Shoaib Aslam, 2017. "Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Firm Performance of Pharmaceuticals: A Study of the London Stock Exchange," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Zucker, Lynne G. & Darby, Michael R., 1997. "Present at the biotechnological revolution: transformation of technological identity for a large incumbent pharmaceutical firm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 429-446, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dr. CPA Peninah Tanui Melly & Dr. Stephen Makewit Mosong, 2024. "Relating Intellectual Capital and Performance via Organizational Ambidexterity: Evidence from Health Facilities in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 757-783, July.
    2. Jian Xu & Binghan Wang, 2019. "Intellectual Capital Performance of the Textile Industry in Emerging Markets: A Comparison with China and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Zoltán Lakner & Anna Kiss & József Popp & Zoltán Zéman & Domicián Máté & Judit Oláh, 2019. "From Basic Research to Competitiveness: An Econometric Analysis of the Global Pharmaceutical Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Jian Xu & Binghan Wang, 2018. "Intellectual Capital, Financial Performance and Companies’ Sustainable Growth: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Veronika Fenyves & Balazs Nyul & Krisztina Dajnoki & Zoltan Bacs & Gergo Tomori, 2019. "Profitability of Pharmaceutical Companies in the Visegrád Countries," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(4), pages 99-111.
    6. Quan Tran & Anh‐Tuan Doan & Thao Tran, 2022. "What are the drivers of SMEs' financial performance? The interaction of intellectual capital and ownership," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 751-777, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:631 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Fabienne Orsi & Jean-Paul Moatti, 2001. "D'un droit de propriété intellectuelle sur le vivant aux firmes de génomique : vers une marchandisation de la connaissance scientifique sur le génome humain," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 150(4), pages 123-138.
    3. McMillan, G. Steven & Narin, Francis & Deeds, David L., 2000. "An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-8, January.
    4. Aishwarya Narayan & Sumukh Hungund, 2022. "Enhancing Firm Performance Through Adoption of Innovation: an Empirical Evidence from Indian Biotechnological Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2431-2456, September.
    5. repec:jes:wpaper:y:2012:v:4:p:396-406 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Jian Xu & Yue Shang & Weizhen Yu & Feng Liu, 2019. "Intellectual Capital, Technological Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Frédéric Corolleur & Vincent Mangematin & A. Torre, 2003. "French Biotech Start-Ups and Biotech Clusters in France. The Importance of Geographic Proximity," Post-Print hal-00424183, HAL.
    8. L.A.K.C. Dahanayaka & D.M. Endagamage & S.R.S.N Sudasinghe, 2022. "The Role of Knowledge Creation in Knowledge Management: A case of Sri Lankan Research Officers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(5), pages 732-739, May.
    9. Khanna, Rajat, 2021. "Aftermath of a tragedy: A star's death and coauthors’ subsequent productivity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    10. Iain Cockburn & Rebecca Henderson & Scott Stern, 1999. "The Diffusion of Science-Driven Drug Discovery: Organizational Change in Pharmaceutical Research," NBER Working Papers 7359, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Marc-Hubert Depret & Abdelillah Hamdouch, 2004. "La gouvernance des jeunes entreprises innovantes:un éclairage analytique à partir du cas des sociétés de biotechnologies," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 7(2), pages 67-94, June.
    12. Sternitzke, Christian, 2010. "Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 810-821, July.
    13. Scoresby, Richard B. & Park, Haemin, 2021. "The joint effects of individual and firm level knowledge attributes on inventor mobility to entrepreneurial and established firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 218-230.
    14. Zhifeng Yin & Qiang Zhi, 2017. "Dancing with the academic elite: a promotion or hindrance of research production?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 17-41, January.
    15. Pearl Abredu & Cai Li & Frank Kofi Essien & Isaiah Agbenu Akanbi Adegoke, 2023. "Unleashing Potential: Overcoming Bottlenecks and Catalyzing Innovations in Intellectual Capital Intellectualization of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Jiangsu During the Post-Industrial Era," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    16. Wallace E. Huffman & Richard E. Just, 1999. "The organization of agricultural research in western developed countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Marta F. Arroyabe & Katrin Hussinger & John Hagedoorn, 2020. "Hiring New Key Inventors to Improve Firms’ Post-M&A Inventive Output," DEM Discussion Paper Series 20-19, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    18. Sarah Athirah Saruchi & Nor Aiza Mohd Zamil & Rohaida Basiruddin & Nor Faezah Ghazi Ahmad, 2019. "Examining the Impact of Corporate Governance on Intellectual Capital: Empirical Evidence of Islamic Banks," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(3), pages 104-117, July.
    19. Poonam Khanna & Lemaro Thompson & Michael Mcdonald, 2015. "Research On Venture Capital Firms’ ‘Investment Behavior A Review’," Working Papers 0197mgt, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    20. Jaideep Anand & Raffaele Oriani & Roberto S. Vassolo, 2010. "Alliance Activity as a Dynamic Capability in the Face of a Discontinuous Technological Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1213-1232, December.
    21. Evgeny Popov & Maxim Vlasov, 2018. "Assessment of Intellectual Development of the Human Capital of Hi-Tech Productions," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(1), pages 121-131.
    22. Maureen McKelvey & Bastian Rake, 2012. "Research Network Position and Innovative Performance: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-021, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intellectual capital; bioeconomy; biotech companies; company’s value; financial performance; correlation analysis; structural equation models (SEM).;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.