IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v20y2018i49p599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Universities in Consolidating Intellectual Capital and Generating New Knowledge for a Sustainable Bio-Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Tiron-Tudor

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Cristina Silvia Nistor

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

This study focuses on the wide debated concept of bio-economy, underlying its evolution and connection with universities’ goal, from the intellectual capital (IC) perspective. It’s aim is to highlight the mutual influence of IC disclosures and knowledge management in its ability to foster the development of the bio economic environment. Thus, this paper covers a significant gap by approaching the universities' IC disclosure and bio-economy evolution. It also enriches the literature by underpinning the proposed model on the macroeconomics theories (public interest theory, stakeholders or agency theory). These theories supports the need to enhance transparency and accountability through greater disclosure levels. The empirical research performed by combining the qualitative analysis performed for developing the IC disclosure index with the quantitative techniques enable us to develop an econometric model on the Romanian public universities. It is aimed to express their role in the IC as a mean of achieving a sustainable economy. The study’ results reveal that there is a strong connection between the IC disclosure and bio-economy, knowing that public universities are research clusters for innovative and durable economy environment. Moreover, based on the Romanian public universities' position, we identified and discussed about the explanatory factors influencing the IC disclosures, which can help or stimulate the association between the public and private interest, having bio-economy as a focus point.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Cristina Silvia Nistor & Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu, 2018. "The Role of Universities in Consolidating Intellectual Capital and Generating New Knowledge for a Sustainable Bio-Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 599-599, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2744.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kes McCormick & Niina Kautto, 2013. "The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Sabri Boubaker & Faten Lakhal & Mehdi Nekhili, 2011. "The determinants of web-based corporate reporting in France," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 27(2), pages 126-155, December.
    3. Loet Leydesdorff & Martin Meyer, 2003. "The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 191-203, October.
    4. Salter, Ammon J. & Martin, Ben R., 2001. "The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 509-532, March.
    5. Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Andrei Stanciu & Madalina Dumitru & Liliana Feleaga, 2014. "Pressure and Isomorphism in Business Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 784-784, August.
    6. repec:eme:majpps:02686901211189835 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Marco Bisogno & Francesca Citro & Aurelio Tommasetti, 2014. "Disclosure of university websites. Evidence from Italian data," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 452-471.
    8. Louise Staffas & Mathias Gustavsson & Kes McCormick, 2013. "Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Kozo Mayumi & John M. Gowdy (ed.), 1999. "Bioeconomics and Sustainability," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1347.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoltán Lakner & Anna Kiss & József Popp & Zoltán Zéman & Domicián Máté & Judit Oláh, 2019. "From Basic Research to Competitiveness: An Econometric Analysis of the Global Pharmaceutical Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Miklos Pakurar & Istvan Andras Kun & Janos Felföldi & Laszlo Vasa & Judit Olah, 2020. "Integration of Logistics Function and Business Performance," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 567-583.
    3. Balan Emilia Mary, 2022. "Where Is Romania In The European Union’S Bioeconomic Context? The Cluster Analyses Approach," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 172-184, February.
    4. Iulia Diana Popa & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2019. "Developing the Romanian Organic Market: A Producer’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Secundo, Giustina & Ndou, Valentina & Vecchio, Pasquale Del & De Pascale, Gianluigi, 2020. "Sustainable development, intellectual capital and technology policies: A structured literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Catalin Postelnicu & Sorin Calea, 2019. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Global Risks, Local Challenges for Employment," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(2), pages 195-206.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:599 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    3. Ming Tang & Huchang Liao & Zhengjun Wan & Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Marc A. Rosen, 2018. "Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Dan Costin Nițescu & Valentin Murgu, 2020. "The Bioeconomy and Foreign Trade in Food Products—A Sustainable Partnership at the European Level?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Lisa Biber-Freudenberger & Amit Kumar Basukala & Martin Bruckner & Jan Börner, 2018. "Sustainability Performance of National Bio-Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Benoit Mougenot & Jean-Pierre Doussoulin, 2022. "Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1031-1047, January.
    8. Matteo De Besi & Kes McCormick, 2015. "Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. George B. Frisvold & Steven M. Moss & Andrea Hodgson & Mary E. Maxon, 2021. "Understanding the U.S. Bioeconomy: A New Definition and Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Natalia Yakovleva & Francisco Camacho-Ferre, 2020. "Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    11. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Kean Birch, 2016. "Emergent Imaginaries and Fragmented Policy Frameworks in the Canadian Bio-Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Leonard Prochaska & Daniel Schiller, 2021. "An evolutionary perspective on the emergence and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policy: the example of the change of the leitmotif from biotechnology to bioeconomy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 141-249, April.
    14. Kiyong Om & Jungmann Lee & Juno Chang, 2007. "Using supply chain management to enhance industry—university collaborations in IT higher education in Korea," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(3), pages 455-471, June.
    15. Oguntuase Oluwaseun James, 2020. "Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development in Africa – State of Production Determinants and Future Directions," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Markus M. Bugge & Teis Hansen & Antje Klitkou, 2016. "What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Sebastian Hinderer & Leif Brändle & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Farhad Mukhtarov & Andrea Gerlak & Robin Pierce, 2017. "Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(6), pages 1010-1028, September.
    19. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2021. "The Knowledge Based Agricultural Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Network Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Irina Chiriac, 2019. "Bio-Economy Development in Romania," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 75-82, August.
    21. Lovrić, Marko & Lovrić, Nataša & Mavsar, Robert, 2020. "Mapping forest-based bioeconomy research in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bio-economics; intellectual capital; universities.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.