IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v60y1970i2p469-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics as a System of Belief

Author

Listed:
  • Galbraith, John Kenneth

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth, 1970. "Economics as a System of Belief," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 469-478, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:60:y:1970:i:2:p:469-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28197005%2960%3A2%3C469%3AEAASOB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nijkamp, P., 1985. "Equity and efficiency in environmental policy analyses : separability versus inseparability," Serie Research Memoranda 0004, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Fellner, Wolfgang & Spash, Clive L., 2014. "The Illusion of Consumer Sovereignity in Economic and Neoliberal Thought," SRE-Discussion Papers 2014/02, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    3. Fellner, Wolfgang & Goehmann, Benedikt, 2017. "Human Needs and the Measurement of Welfare," SRE-Discussion Papers 2017/07, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Alexandre Chirat, 2021. "When Berle and Galbraith brought political economy back to life : Study of a cross-fertilization (1933-1967)," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-27, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    5. Alexandre Chirat & Charlotte Le Chapelain, 2017. "Some “unexpected proximities” between Schultz and Galbraith on human capital," Working Papers of BETA 2017-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Alexandre Chirat & Charlotte Le Chapelain, 2017. "Some “unexpected proximities” between Schultz and Galbraith on human capital," Working Papers 08-17, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    7. L.A. Duhs, 2008. "FROM GALBRAITH TO KRUGMAN AND BACK Galbraith, Krugman and 'Good Economics'," Discussion Papers Series 369, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    8. Spash, Clive L. & Dobernig, Karin, 2017. "Theories of (Un)sustainable Consumption," SRE-Discussion Papers 2017/04, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
      • Clive L. Spash & Karin Dobernig, 2017. "Theories of (Un)sustainable Consumption," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2017_04, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    9. Göran Bolin, 2016. "Afterword: The construction of markets for place branding and public diplomacy: A view from the north," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 236-241, August.
    10. Yana S. Matkovskaya & Elena Vechkinzova & Yelena Petrenko & Larissa Steblyakova, 2021. "Problems of Innovative Development of Oil Companies: Actual State, Forecast and Directions for Overcoming the Prolonged Innovation Pause," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Paul Johnson & Bart J. Wilson, 2008. "Economics Works! Experiments in High School Classrooms," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 23(Spring 20), pages 149-156.
    12. Lall Ramrattan & Michael Szenberg, 2010. "Memorializing John K. Galbraith: A Review of His Major Works, 1908–2006," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 55(1), pages 31-45, May.
    13. Mather, Loys L. & Davis, Joe T. & Reese, M.A., 1981. "Advertising, Product Differentiation, And The Demand Pull Hypothesis In The Food Manufacturing And Retail Industries," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:60:y:1970:i:2:p:469-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.