IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/jgjorm/v4y2018i4p53-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation within a generation: what worked and what next?

Author

Listed:
  • Oto Buraimo
  • Olatunji Sonoiki

    (Brymore Public Health, Nigeria
    World Food Programme, Nigeria)

Abstract

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) involves the non-therapeutic partial or complete removal of external female genitalia for non-medical reasons but largely due to cultural, religious and social reasons. Besides the obvious physical agony experienced by women subjected to FGM/C, the practice of FGM/C is still endemic in about 29 countries in Africa, Asia and Middle East, and worldwide due to international migration. Over 200 million are affected, 3 million girls and women stand the risk of undergoing FGM/C annually and more recent statistics show that 15 million girls are at risk of undergoing FGM/C by 2020 in the absence of apt intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Oto Buraimo & Olatunji Sonoiki, 2018. "Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation within a generation: what worked and what next?," Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 4(4), pages 53-57, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:adp:jgjorm:v:4:y:2018:i:4:p:53-57
    DOI: 10.19080/GJORM.2018.04.555641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/pdf/GJORM.MS.ID.555641.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/GJORM.MS.ID.555641.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/GJORM.2018.04.555641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rigmor C Berg & Eva Denison, 2012. "Interventions to reduce the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting in African countries," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 1-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prachi Pundir & Ashrita Saran & Howard White & Ramya Subrahmanian & Jill Adona, 2020. "Interventions for reducing violence against children in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    2. Nathan Manning & Kathy Edwards, 2014. "Why Has Civic Education Failed to Increase Young People's Political Participation?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Kathryn M Yount & Yuk Fai Cheong & Rose Grace Grose & Sarah R Hayford, 2020. "Community gender systems and a daughter’s risk of female genital mutilation/cutting: Multilevel findings from Egypt," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Sandrine Mesplé-Somps, 2016. "Migration and female genital mutilation," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 282-282, August.
    5. Yount, Kathryn M. & Krause, Kathleen H. & Miedema, Stephanie S., 2017. "Preventing gender-based violence victimization in adolescent girls in lower-income countries: Systematic review of reviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Hugh Waddington & Birte Snilstveit & Jorge Hombrados & Martina Vojtkova & Daniel Phillips & Philip Davies & Howard White, 2014. "Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages -335.
    7. Strachan, Jacinta Muteshi, 2021. "A commentary: Using a theory-based approach to guide a global programme of FGM/C research: What have we learned about creating actionable research findings?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:jgjorm:v:4:y:2018:i:4:p:53-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.