IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acl/journl/yid185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the mathematic modeling tools to assess an economic impact from ratifications for regional agreements WTO+

Author

Listed:
  • K. M. Puzankov

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify problems of applying mathematic methods in order to evaluate economic benefits from ratifications for new types of regional agreements WTO+. The evolvement of trade agreements shown and the main driving motives of regionalization revealed because of this investigation. Russian practice of applying mathematic methods experienced considering non-tariff measures factor. Scheme of economic evaluating of macroeconomic indicators from ratification of regional agreements developed due to analyses of Russian practice and foreign publications. The study provides recommendations on opportunities to improve the quality of assessment of macroeconomic indicators in the Eurasian Economic Union.

Suggested Citation

  • K. M. Puzankov, 0. "Applying the mathematic modeling tools to assess an economic impact from ratifications for regional agreements WTO+," International Trade and Trade Policy, ФГБОУ ВО "Ð Ð¾Ñ Ñ Ð¸Ð¹Ñ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ñ‡ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑƒÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑ€Ñ Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÑ‚ им. Г.Ð’. Плеханова", issue 2.
    • Handle: RePEc:acl:journl:y::id:185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mttp.rea.ru/jour/article/viewFile/185/148
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kreinin, Mordechai E. & Plummer, Michael G. (ed.), 2012. "The Oxford Handbook of International Commercial Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195378047.
    2. Jeronim Capaldo, 2014. "The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: European Disintegration, Unemployment and Instability," GDAE Working Papers 14-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engler, Philipp & Tervala, Juha, 2018. "Welfare effects of TTIP in a DSGE model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 230-238.
    2. Masahiro Kawai & Ganeshan Wignaraja, 2014. "Policy challenges posed by Asian free trade agreements: a review of the evidence," Chapters, in: Richard Baldwin & Masahiro Kawai & Ganeshan Wignaraja (ed.), A World Trade Organization for the 21st Century, chapter 8, pages 182-238, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Fritz Breuss, 2020. "Pro-Globalization via FTAs in Times of COVID-19," WIFO Working Papers 617, WIFO.
    4. Latorre, María C. & Yonezawa, Hidemichi, 2018. "Stopped TTIP? Its potential impact on the world and the role of neglected FDI," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 99-120.
    5. Andreas Reinstaller & Elisabeth Christen & Harald Oberhofer & Peter Reschenhofer, 2016. "Eine Analyse der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Österreichs im bilateralen Handel mit den USA (TTIP)," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58723.
    6. Ganeshan Wignaraja, 2014. "Will South Asia Benefit from Pan-Asian Integration?," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 15(2), pages 175-197, September.
    7. Forizs, Virág & Nilsson, Lars, 2017. "Trade Effects of the EU–Korea Free Trade Agreement: A Comparative Analysis of Expected and Observed Outcomes," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 18(1), July.
    8. Catherine Long, 2016. "The Opportunity Space of Overlapping Trade Regimes: Turkey, the Customs Union, and TTIP," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(3), pages 360-369, September.
    9. A. Portansky P. & А. Портанский П., 2017. "О перспективах мегарегиональных торговых соглашений // About the Prospects of Megaregional Trade Agreements," Мир новой экономики // The world of new economy, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation, issue 3, pages 47-53.
    10. Bekkers, Eddy & Rojas-Romagosa, Hugo, 2016. "Quantitative trade models and the economic assessment of TTIP," Conference papers 332769, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Blind, Knut & Müller, Jo-Ann, 2019. "The role of standards in the policy debate on the EU-US trade agreement," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 21-38.
    12. Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2014. "Assessing the Experience of South Asia–East Asia Integration and India’s Role," ADBI Working Papers 465, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    13. Christopher S.P. Magee, 2017. "The Increasing Irrelevance of Trade Diversion," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 278-305, May.
    14. Pierre Kohler & Servaas Storm, 2016. "CETA Without Blinders: How Cutting ‘Trade Costs and More’ Will Cause Unemployment, Inequality and Welfare Losses," GDAE Working Papers 16-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    15. Alina ALEXOAEI & Valentin COJANU, 2017. "Negotiating the Transatlantic deal: focus on the EU's domestic constraints," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 9(3), pages 233-254, October.
    16. Evgenia Katraki & Christos Vatalachos, 2016. "Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Implications to the European South," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 10(1), pages 39-55, June.
    17. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer, 2016. "The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates," Working Paper Series WP16-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    18. Dai, Liang & Derudder, Ben & Liu, Xingjian, 2018. "The evolving structure of the Southeast Asian air transport network through the lens of complex networks, 1979–2012," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 67-77.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acl:journl:y::id:185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Латышов Рртём Ð’Ñ Ñ‡ÐµÑ Ð»Ð°Ð²Ð¾Ð²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rea.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.