IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/yid337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Implementation of Youth Social Programs for Patriotic Education Citizens of Russian Federation: Experience of Saint-Petersburg

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Olegovna Kuzina
  • Natalia Vladimirovna Kolosova
  • Anna Georgievna Sanina

Abstract

The article analyzes the state policy in the field of patriotic education. Particular attention is paid to the program approach and the justification of the need to include the practice of patriotic education in nation-building and civic education. The authors consider theoretical bases of patriotic education and conducted a retrospective analysis of the state policy in the field of patriotic education in the USSR and Russia. The analysis of targets and scorecards of the last three state programs of patriotic education of citizens of the Russian Federation leads to the conclusion that they have a mismatch targets and tools to achieve the goal. Latitude expected results covering the economic, political and social spheres, while specific measures are reduced, in most cases, to the military-patriotic work with schoolchildren and young people. This determines the importance and responsibility of regional youth social policy in the system of patriotic education in the Russian Federation and leads to the necessity to continuously improve the regulatory framework, to develop new mechanisms and improve the effectiveness of interventions. Program approach is considered as a basis of formation of system of patriotic education in St. Petersburg. The authors emphasize that the integration of patriotic education in a program to provide the public consent is a marker of a comprehensive transformation in this area. It is no longer about patriotic education per se, as it was in the previous Soviet and Russian tradition, but a more complex formation of patriotism in the context of national and civic identity. This is reflected in including in a variety of activities aimed at the development of civil and patriotic education of citizens in St. Petersburg system, as well as high values of indicators of the program.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Olegovna Kuzina & Natalia Vladimirovna Kolosova & Anna Georgievna Sanina, 0. "The Implementation of Youth Social Programs for Patriotic Education Citizens of Russian Federation: Experience of Saint-Petersburg," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 5.
    • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y::id:337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/337/338
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davidov, Eldad, 2009. "Measurement Equivalence of Nationalism and Constructive Patriotism in the ISSP: 34 Countries in a Comparative Perspective," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 64-82, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils D. Steiner & Philipp Harms, 2020. "Local Trade Shocks and the Nationalist Backlash in Political Attitudes: Panel Data Evidence from Great Britain," Working Papers 2014, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    2. Julian Aichholzer & Sylvia Kritzinger & Carolina Plescia, 2021. "National identity profiles and support for the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(2), pages 293-315, June.
    3. Shang Ha & Seung-Jin Jang, 2015. "National Identity, National Pride, and Happiness: The Case of South Korea," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 471-482, April.
    4. Eldad Davidov & Hermann Dülmer & Jan Cieciuch & Anabel Kuntz & Daniel Seddig & Peter Schmidt, 2018. "Explaining Measurement Nonequivalence Using Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(4), pages 729-760, November.
    5. Alexander Mohr & Christian Schumacher, 2019. "The Contingent Effect of Patriotic Rhetoric on Firm Performance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 94-110, June.
    6. Harms, Philipp & Steiner, Nils, 2019. "The China Shock and the Nationalist Backlash against Globalization: Attitudinal Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203506, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Stéfanie André, 2014. "Does Trust Mean the Same for Migrants and Natives? Testing Measurement Models of Political Trust with Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 963-982, February.
    8. Blaine G. Robbins, 2022. "Measuring Generalized Trust: Two New Approaches," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(1), pages 305-356, February.
    9. Gal Ariely & Eldad Davidov, 2011. "Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 271-286, November.
    10. Malina Voicu & Ioana Ramia, 2021. "European Identity: An Analysis of Measurement Equivalence Across Countries and Mode of Data Collection in the European Values Survey 2017/2018," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 815-834, April.
    11. Marlene Mußotter, 2022. "We do not measure what we aim to measure: Testing Three Measurement Models for Nationalism and Patriotism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2177-2197, August.
    12. Jennifer L. Hochschild & Charles Lang, 2011. "Including Oneself and Including Others: Who Belongs in My Country?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 634(1), pages 78-97, March.
    13. Willem E. Saris & André Pirralha & Diana Zavala-Rojas, 2018. "Testing the Comparability of Different Types of Social Indicators Across Groups," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 927-939, February.
    14. Bastiaan Bruinsma & Marlene Mußotter, 2023. "A Move Forward: Exploring National Identity Through Non-linear Principal Component Analysis in Germany," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 885-903, February.
    15. Sebastian Tocar, 2022. "Cultural Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment: Nationalist-Xenophobic Attitudes," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 8(2).
    16. Yu, Shubin & Hu, Yangjuan, 2020. "When luxury brands meet China: The effect of localized celebrity endorsements in social media marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Alessandro Indelicato & Juan Carlos Martín, 2022. "Are Citizens Credentialist or Post-Nationalists? A Fuzzy-Eco Apostle Model Applied to National Identity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Gabriele Prati & Iana Tzankova & Cinzia Albanesi & Elvira Cicognani, 2022. "Longitudinal Predictors of Perceived Climate Change Importance and Worry among Italian Youths: A Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Paola Annoni & Nicholas Charron, 2019. "Measurement Assessment in Cross-Country Comparative Analysis: Rasch Modelling on a Measure of Institutional Quality," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 31-60, January.
    20. Antonio Fernández-Cano & Elvira Curiel-Marin & Manuel Torralbo-Rodríguez & Mónica Vallejo-Ruiz, 2018. "Questioning the Shanghai Ranking methodology as a tool for the evaluation of universities: an integrative review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 2069-2083, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y::id:337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.