IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acb/agenda/v2y1995i4p411-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Zealand’s ‘Light-Handed’ Approach to Utility Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Alan E. Bollard
  • Michael Pickford

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan E. Bollard & Michael Pickford, 1995. "New Zealand’s ‘Light-Handed’ Approach to Utility Regulation," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 2(4), pages 411-422.
    • Handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:2:y:1995:i:4:p:411-422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p43661/pdf/article021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Ross, 1995. "New Zealand’s Experiment in Pricing Access to Essential Facilities," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 2(3), pages 366-370.
    2. Graham Scott, 1995. "New Zealand’s Fiscal Responsibility Act," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 3-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Pickford, 1996. "Pricing Access to Essential Facilities," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 165-176.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Robinson, 1996. "Can Fiscal Responsibility Legislation be Made to Work?," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 3(4), pages 419-430.
    2. John Ablett, 1996. "Generational Accounting and Intergenerational Balance," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 3(4), pages 407-418.
    3. James Cox, 1995. "How Much Spending? The EPAC Survey of Public Expenditure Preferences in Australia," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 2(2), pages 245-248.
    4. Buckle, Robert A., 2018. "A quarter of a century of fiscal responsibility: The origins and evolution of fiscal policy governance and institutional arrangements in New Zealand, 1994 to 2018," Working Paper Series 20848, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    5. Buckle, Robert A., 2018. "A quarter of a century of fiscal responsibility: The origins and evolution of fiscal policy governance and institutional arrangements in New Zealand, 1994 to 2018," Working Paper Series 7693, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    6. Vince FitzGerald, 1996. "Public Policy and National Saving," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 3-16.
    7. Michael Pickford, 1996. "Pricing Access to Essential Facilities," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 165-176.
    8. Murray Petrie & David Webber, 2001. "Review of Evidence on Broad Outcome of Public Sector Management Regime," Treasury Working Paper Series 01/06, New Zealand Treasury.
    9. Stephen P. King, 1995. "Guaranteeing Access to Essential Infrastructure," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 2(4), pages 423-431.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:2:y:1995:i:4:p:411-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.