IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acb/agenda/v19y2012i2p23-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Treasury-KPMG Econtech Modelling of the Excess Burden of Mining Taxation: Some Doubts

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Pincus

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Pincus, 2012. "The Treasury-KPMG Econtech Modelling of the Excess Burden of Mining Taxation: Some Doubts," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 23-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:19:y:2012:i:2:p:23-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p208901/pdf/ch036.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Ergas & Mark Harrison & Jonathan Pincus, 2010. "Some Economics of Mining Taxation," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 29(4), pages 369-383, December.
    2. Henry Ergas & Jonathan Pincus, 2012. "Modelling the Excess Burden of Royalties," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2012-03, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henry Ergas & Jonathan Pincus, 2014. "Have Mining Royalties Been Beneficial to Australia?," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 13-28, March.
    2. P Sivashankar & RMPS Rathnayake & Maneka Jayasinghe & Christine Smith, 2017. "Incidence of value added taxation on inequality: Evidence from Sri Lanka," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201704, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henry Ergas & Jonathan Pincus, 2014. "Have Mining Royalties Been Beneficial to Australia?," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 13-28, March.
    2. Celal Bayari, 2016. "Economic Geography of the Australian Mining Industry," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 552-566, December.
    3. Eduardo A. Haddad & Jaime Bonet-Morón & Gerson Javier Pérez-Valbuena, 2022. "Impacto regional de las regalías en Colombia," Documentos de trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 309, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    4. Vining, Aidan R. & Moore, Mark A., 2017. "Potash ownership and extraction: Between a rock and a hard place in Saskatchewan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 71-80.
    5. Freebairn, John, 2012. "Mining booms and government budgets," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(2), pages 1-21.
    6. Jonathan Pincus, 2013. "The Power to Tax, 33 Years Later," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 89-104.
    7. Valle de Souza, Simone & Dollery, Brian & Blackwell, Boyd, 2018. "An empirical analysis of mining costs and mining royalties in Queensland local government," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 656-662.
    8. Hogan, Lindsay, 2012. "Non-renewable resource taxation: policy reform in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(2), pages 1-16.
    9. Drew, Joseph & Dollery, Brian Edward & Blackwell, Boyd Dirk, 2018. "A square deal? Mining costs, mining royalties and local government in New South Wales, Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 113-122.
    10. Smith, James L., 2013. "Issues in extractive resource taxation: A review of research methods and models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 320-331.
    11. Boyd Blackwell & Brian Dollery, 2013. "Resource Taxation and Remote Aboriginal Expenditure," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 360-382, September.
    12. Cullen, Ross, 2014. "The good oil. State roles in Norwegian petroleum sector," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165816, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:19:y:2012:i:2:p:23-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.