IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acb/agenda/v16y2009i4p67-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A ‘no-returns tax system’ for Australia: Some inconvenient facts

Author

Listed:
  • Sinclair Davidson

Abstract

It has been proposed that Australia adopt a ‘no-returns’ income tax system. One consequence of such a reform would be the standardisation, or even elimination, of work-related expense deductions. Using ATO data it is shown that in introducing a no-returns tax system and eliminating work-related expense deductions, the average Australian (making a claim) would save $268 on accountant fees but forgo $1860. In addition eliminating itemised work-related expense deductions would have a regressive impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Sinclair Davidson, 2009. "A ‘no-returns tax system’ for Australia: Some inconvenient facts," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 16(4), pages 67-82.
    • Handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:16:y:2009:i:4:p:67-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p88831/pdf/041.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Leigh, 2007. "Taxpaying Made Easy," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 81-86.
    2. Tran-Nam, Binh & Evans, Chris & Walpole, Michael & Ritchie, Katherine, 2000. "Tax Compliance Costs: Research Methodology and Empirical Evidence from Australia," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 2), pages 229-52, June.
    3. Brennan,Geoffrey & Buchanan,James M., 2006. "The Power to Tax," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521027922, September.
    4. Tran-Nam, Binh & Evans, Chris & Walpole, Michael & Ritchie, Katherine, 2000. "Tax Compliance Costs: Research Methodology and Empirical Evidence From Australia," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 53(2), pages 229-252, June.
    5. Gale, William G. & Holtzblatt, Janet, 1997. "On the Possibility of a No-Return Tax System," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 50(3), pages 475-85, September.
    6. Gale, William G. & Holtzblatt, Janet, 1997. "On the Possibility of a No-Return Tax System," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 50(3), pages 475-485, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sacchidananda Mukherjee & Shivani Badola, 2022. "Estimation of VAT compliance costs of unincorporated enterprises in India: unit-level analysis," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 421-441, December.
    2. repec:eur:ejesjr:373 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Li, Lixing & Liu, Kevin Zhengcheng & Nie, Zhuo & Xi, Tianyang, 2021. "Evading by any means? VAT enforcement and payroll tax evasion in China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 770-784.
    4. Gale, William G., 1997. "What Can America Learn From the British Tax System?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 50(4), pages 753-777, December.
    5. Jan Pavel & Leoš Vítek, 2015. "Vyvolané náklady daňového systému v ČR [Compliance Costs of the Czech Tax System]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(3), pages 317-330.
    6. John Kitching, 2006. "A Burden on Business? Reviewing the Evidence Base on Regulation and Small-Business Performance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(6), pages 799-814, December.
    7. Kiridaran Kanagaretnam & Jimmy Lee & Chee Yeow Lim & Gerald Lobo, 2018. "Societal trust and corporate tax avoidance," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1588-1628, December.
    8. Sebastian Eichfelder & François Vaillancourt, 2014. "Tax Compliance Costs: A Review of Cost Burdens and Cost Structures," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 210(3), pages 111-148, September.
    9. Matthias Mors & Anne Bucher & Katri Kosonen & Philippe Cattoir & Wim Koevoets & Werner Vanborren, 2004. "European Tax Survey," Taxation Papers 3, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission, revised Nov 2004.
    10. James Alm & Pablo Saavedra & Edward Sennoga, 2007. "How Should Individuals Be Taxed?. Combining "Simplified", Income, and Payroll Taxes in Ukraine," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 63(3), pages 350-373, September.
    11. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Hechtner, Frank, 2016. "Tax compliance costs: Cost burden and cost reliability," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 212, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    12. Juraj Nemec & Ladislav Pompura & Vladimír Šagát, 2015. "Administrative Costs of Taxation in Slovakia," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 51-61.
    13. Schenkel, Andreas, 2015. "Bankenregulierung und Bürokratiekosten: Ein Problemaufriss," Arbeitspapiere 152, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    14. James, Simon & Alley, Clinton, 2002. "Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration," MPRA Paper 26906, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Kegels, Chantal, 2014. "Compliance costs caused by agency action? Empirical evidence and implications for tax compliance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 200-219.
    16. Andrew Leigh, 2007. "Taxpaying Made Easy," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 81-86.
    17. S. Vishnuhadevi, 2021. "Administrative and Compliance Costs of Value Added Tax (VAT): A Review," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 26(2), pages 179-206, December.
    18. Allen Huang & Benjamin Liu, 2013. "The GST and mortgage costs: Australian evidence," Discussion Papers in Finance finance:201302, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    19. Susan M. Dynarski & Judith E. Scott-Clayton, 2008. "Complexity and Targeting in Federal Student Aid: A Quantitative Analysis," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 22, pages 109-150, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Balázs Hohmann, 2021. "Possibilities for Modernization of Conciliation Board Procedures in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe - Online Dispute Resolution and Electronic Communication," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, ejss_v4_i.
    21. Marius Surugiu & Raluca Mazilescu & Camelia Surugiu, 2020. "Tax compliance: cointegration analysis in romanian context," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 32(1), pages 116-122, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:16:y:2009:i:4:p:67-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.