IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v22y2009i1no2p145-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profit and Loss Allocation among Islamic Bank and Client Partner in Equity Financing: Practice, Precepts and Alternatives توزيع الأرباح والخسائر بين المصارف الإسلامية وعملاء تمويل المشاركة: المنطق والمفاهيم والبدائل

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Abdurrahman Sadique

    (Assistant Professor Dept. of Islamic Law - Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia)

Abstract

The profit sharing ratio in equity financed projects is decided by Islamic banks mainly through applying the relevant rate of return on capital. After first determining the return sought by the bank, the remainder of the expected profit is usually taken as the share of the joint partner, and the proportion adopted as the profit sharing ratio. Ideally, the profit sharing ratio should be decided through a mutual process considering the contributions of both partners, with due recognition of the level of liability each had borne. The period, as a factor common to the joint venture, could be redundant. Hence, the profit sharing ratio should be reflective of the capital and labour outlay of both the bank and the client, to the extent possible. In view of the socio-economic function expected of Islamic banks, the method for profit ratio calculation adopted should adequately consider the actual contributions of both partners. Two bases possible are giving capital and labour of both partners equal weightage, and giving capital a weightage different from labour. تقرر المصارف الإسلامية نسبة تقاسم الأرباح في المشاريع الممولة على أساس الشركة مع العملاء عن طريق تطبيق معدل العائد على رأس المال. بعد التحديد أولا للعائد المطلوب للبنك على رأس المال المقدم للمشروع، ما تبقى من الأرباح المتوقعة عادة ما يتخذ كحصة الشريك، وتعتمد النسبة كنسبة تقاسم الأرباح. هذا مع أن المثل الأعلى هو أن نسبة تقاسم الربح يجب أن تقرر بشكل مشترك، نظرا إلى مساهمات كل من الشركاء على حد سواء، مع إيلاء الاعتبار الواجب لمستوى المسؤولية الذي يتحمله كل شريك. أما مدة التعرض، فبوصفها عاملا عاما على المشروع المشترك، فإنها لا ينبغي أن تؤثر على حساب حصة شريك واحد. ومن ثم، فإن نسبة تقاسم الربح ينبغي أن تعكس إنفاق رأس المال والعمل من قبل كل من البنك والعميل إلى حد ممكن، وهذا يمكن أن يكون أكثر انسجاما مع الوظيفة الاجتماعية والاقتصادية المتوقعة من المصارف الإسلامية. قاعدتان ممكنتان في هذا الصدد هما ترجيح كل من رأس المال والعمل من الشريكين على حد سواء، وإعطاء رأس المال ترجيحا مختلفا عن العمل.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Abdurrahman Sadique, 2009. "Profit and Loss Allocation among Islamic Bank and Client Partner in Equity Financing: Practice, Precepts and Alternatives توزيع الأرباح والخسائر بين المصارف الإسلامية وعملاء تمويل المشاركة: المنطق وال," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 22(1), pages 145-168, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:22:y:2009:i:1:no:2:p:145-168
    DOI: 10.4197/islec.22-1.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153880_IEI-VOL-22-1-06E-MSadique.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/islec.22-1.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Obaidullah, 2005. "The Islamic Financial Services الخدمات المالية الإسلامية," Books published by the Islamic Economics Institute, KAAU., King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., edition 1, number 40, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Ashfaque & Syed Mohsin Ali Shah & Fahad Sultan & Haider Khalil & Arif Hussain & Muhammad Khan, 2020. "Ethical Value Propositions of Islamic Banking Products: A Phenomenological Inquiry of Relationship Managers Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 8-14.
    2. Abdullah Ibrahim Nazal & Fuad Al-Fasfus, 2018. "Impact of Liquidity Rules on Shareholders’ Returns in Jordan Islamic Bank," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 225-225, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mollah, Sabur & Skully, Michael & Liljeblom, Eva, 2021. "Strong Boards and Risk-taking in Islamic Banks," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(1-2), pages 135-180, April.
    2. Amir-Ud-Din, Rafi, 2014. "Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah: Are We Measuring The Immeasurable?," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 22, pages 1-32.
    3. Pejman Abedifar & Philip Molyneux & Amine Tarazi, 2013. "Risk in Islamic Banking," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 17(6), pages 2035-2096.
    4. Tasawar Nawaz & Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2021. "On intellectual capital efficiency and shariah governance in Islamic banking business model," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 3770-3787, July.
    5. Zulkufly Ramly & Nurusysyifa Nordin, 2018. "Sharia Supervision Board, Board Independence, Risk Committee and Risk-taking of Islamic Banks in Malaysia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 290-300.
    6. Nawaz, Tasawar & Virk, Nader Shahzad, 2019. "Religious entrenchment and agency costs," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 83-86.
    7. Pejman Abedifar & Shahid M. Ebrahim & Philip Molyneux & Amine Tarazi, 2015. "Islamic Banking And Finance: Recent Empirical Literature And Directions For Future Research," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 637-670, September.
    8. Hassan, M. Kabir & Khan, Ashraf & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2019. "Liquidity risk, credit risk and stability in Islamic and conventional banks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 17-31.
    9. Dawood Ashraf, 2016. "Does Shari’ah Screening Cause Abnormal Returns? Empirical Evidence from Islamic Equity Indices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 209-228, March.
    10. Malanta S. Abdullahi & Adamu Kuku Usman & Nuraddeen M. Lawal, 2021. "Determinants of Viability of Islamic Banking Products: A Case Study of Jaiz Bank Plc," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 8(10), pages 58-67, October.
    11. Andrew C. Worthington & Alsadek H. Gait, 2009. "Libyan Business Firm Attitudes towards Islamic Methods in Finance," Discussion Papers in Finance finance:200910, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    12. Bladimir Proaño‐Rivera & José Manuel Feria‐Dominguez, 2024. "Are Ecuadorian banks enough technically efficient for growth? A clinical study," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2011-2029, April.
    13. Sobarsyah, Muhammad & Soedarmono, Wahyoe & Yudhi, Wahdi Salasi Apri & Trinugroho, Irwan & Warokka, Ari & Pramono, Sigid Eko, 2020. "Loan growth, capitalization, and credit risk in Islamic banking," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 155-162.
    14. Irawan Febianto, 2010. "Risk Management In Mudharabah And Musharakah Financing Of Islamic Banks," Working Papers in Business, Management and Finance 201013, Department of Management and Business, Padjadjaran University, revised Nov 2010.
    15. Sabur Mollah & M. Kabir Hassan & Omar Farooque & Asma Mobarek, 2017. "The governance, risk-taking, and performance of Islamic banks," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 51(2), pages 195-219, April.
    16. Irawan Febianto & Rahmatina A. Kasri, 2007. "Why Do Islamic Banks Tend To Avoid Profit And Loss Sharing Arrangements ?," Working Papers in Business, Management and Finance 200705, Department of Management and Business, Padjadjaran University, revised May 2007.
    17. Ahmed Elnahas & Ghada Ismail & Rwan El‐Khatib & M. Kabir Hassan, 2021. "Islamic labeled firms: Revisiting Dow Jones measure of compliance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5-6), pages 988-1021, May.
    18. Chokaev, Bekhan (Чокаев, Бекхан), 2017. "Islamic Finance: Possibilities for Russian Economy [Исламские Финансы: Возможности Для Российской Экономики]," Working Papers 031719, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    19. Maazullah, & Bedi, Arjun S., 2017. "Returns to Islamic Microfinance: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Pakistan," IZA Discussion Papers 10965, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Gait, Lsadek Hesain A., 2009. "The Impact Of Demographic Variables On Libyan Retail Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Islamic Methods Of Finance," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 17, pages 1-18.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:22:y:2009:i:1:no:2:p:145-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.