Contact information of Cambridge University Press
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help
correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .
Content
July 2020, Volume 15, Issue 4
- 534-544 Gender differences in the trade-off between objective equality and efficiency
by Capraro, Valerio
- 545-560 Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball overtimes?
by Morgulev, Elia & Voslinsky, Alisa & Azar, Ofer H. & Bar-Eli, Michael
- 561-571 Solve the dilemma by spinning a penny? On using random decision-making aids
by Jaffé, Mariela E. & Douneva, Maria & Greifeneder, Rainer
- 572-585 Are the symptoms really remitting? How the subjective interpretation of outcomes can produce an illusion of causality
by Blanco, Fernando & Moreno-Fernández, Maria Manuela & Matute, Helena
- 586-599 The psychology of task management: The smaller tasks trap
by Rusou, Zohar & Amar, Moty & Ayal, Shahar
- 600-610 May the odds — or your personality — be in your favor: Probability of observing a favorable outcome, Honesty-Humility, and dishonest behavior
by Schild, Christoph & Moshagen, Morten & Ścigała, Karolina A. & Zettler, Ingo
May 2020, Volume 15, Issue 3
- 304-310 Money makes the world go round, and basic research can help
by Erev, Ido
- 312-329 An experimental guide to vehicles in the park
by Struchiner, Noel & Hannikainen, Ivar R. & de Almeida, Guilherme da F. C. F.
- 330-345 Do multiple-trial games better reflect prosocial behavior than single-trial games?
by Haesevoets, Tessa & Van Hiel, Alain & Dierckx, Kim & Reinders Folmer, Chris
- 346-352 Crowding-out (-in) Effects of Subsidy Schemes on Individual Donations: An Experimental Study
by Peng, Hui-Chun & Liu, Wen-Jing
- 353-370 Harbingers of foul play: A field study of gain/loss frames and regulatory fit in the NFL
by Polman, Evan & Van Swol, Lyn M. & Hoban, Paul R.
- 371-380 Inducing alternative-based and characteristic-based search procedures in risky choice
by Mittone, Luigi & Papi, Mauro
- 381-400 Delay discounting and risky choice: Meta-analytic evidence regarding single-process theories
by Johnson, Kelli L. & Bixter, Michael T. & Luhmann, Christian C.
- 401-412 Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit
by Evans, Anthony & Sleegers, Willem & Mlakar, Žan
- 413-420 Comparing the effect of rational and emotional appeals on donation behavior
by Lindauer, Matthew & Mayorga, Marcus & Greene, Joshua & Slovic, Paul & Västfjäll, Daniel & Singer, Peter
- 421-442 Consequences, norms, and inaction: A critical analysis
by Baron, Jonathan & Goodwin, Geoffrey P.
- 443-445 Patients prefer artificial intelligence to a human provider, provided the AI is better than the human: A commentary on Longoni, Bonezzi and Morewedge (2019)
by Pezzo, Mark V. & Beckstead, Jason W.
- 446-448 Resistance to medical artificial intelligence is an attribute in a compensatory decision process: response to Pezzo and Beckstead (2020)
by Longoni, Chiara & Bonezzi, Andrea & Morewedge, Carey K.
- 449-451 Algorithm aversion is too often presented as though it were non-compensatory: A reply to Longoni et al. (2020)
by Pezzo, Mark V. & Beckstead, Jason W.
March 2020, Volume 15, Issue 2
- 159-172 The many obstacles to effective giving
by Caviola, Lucius & Schubert, Stefan & Nemirow, Jason
- 173-181 Fewer but poorer: Benevolent partiality in prosocial preferences
by Paolacci, Gabriele & Yalcin, Gizem
- 182-192 “Do the right thing” for whom? An experiment on ingroup favouritism, group assorting and moral suasion
by Bilancini, Ennio & Boncinelli, Leonardo & Capraro, Valerio & Celadin, Tatiana & Paolo, Roberto Di
- 193-202 Does intuitive mindset influence belief in God? A registered replication of Shenhav, Rand and Greene (2012)
by Saribay, S. Adil & Yilmaz, Onurcan & Körpe, Gülay Gözde
- 203-213 Interpreting politically-charged numerical information: The influence of numeracy and problem difficulty on response accuracy
by Baker, S. Glenn & Patel, Niraj & Gunten, Curtis Von & Valentine, K. D. & Scherer, Laura D.
- 214-229 Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges
by Pantazi, Myrto & Klein, Olivier & Kissine, Mikhail
- 230-245 Gaze patterns disclose the link between cognitive reflection and sophistication in strategic interaction
by Zonca, Joshua & Coricelli, Giorgio & Polonio, Luca
- 246-253 Preferences for rank in competition: Is first-place seeking stronger than last-place aversion?
by Shechter, Steven M. & Hardisty, David J.
- 254-265 Training choices toward low value options
by Zoltak, Michael J. & Holland, Rob W. & Kukken, Niels & Veling, Harm
- 266-281 Reliance on small samples and the value of taxing reckless behaviors
by Yakobi, Ofir & Cohen, Doron & Naveh, Eitan & Erev, Ido
- 282-303 Decisions from experience: Competitive search and choice in kind and wicked environments
by Frey, Renato
January 2020, Volume 15, Issue 1
- 1-6 Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise
by Mosleh, Mohsen & Stewart, Alexander J. & Plotkin, Joshua B. & Rand, David G.
- 7-24 What does it mean to maximize? “Decision difficulty,” indecisiveness, and the jingle-jangle fallacies in the measurement of maximizing
by Cheek, Nathan N. & Goebel, Jacob
- 25-46 This way, please: Uncovering the directional effects of attribute translations on decision making
by Mertens, Stephanie & Hahnel, Ulf J. J. & Brosch, Tobias
- 47-73 MARTER: Markov True and Error model of drifting parameters
by Birnbaum, Michael H. & Wan, Lucy
- 74-81 Robust consistency of choice switching in decisions from experience
by Yechiam, Eldad
- 82-92 The effect of incentive structure on search in the secretary problem
by Hsiao, Yu-Chin & Kemp, Simon
- 93-111 The false allure of fast lures
by Attali, Yigal & Bar-Hillel, Maya
- 112-134 Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale
by Shou, Yiyun & Olney, Joel
- 135-148 Validation and invariance across age and gender for the Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire in a sample of Portuguese adults
by Filipe, Luís & Alvarez, Maria-João & Roberto, Magda Sofia & Ferreira, Joaquim A.
- 149-158 Translation and validation of the Moral Foundations Vignettes (MFVs) for the Portuguese language in a Brazilian sample
by Marques, Lucas Murrins & Clifford, Scott & Iyengar, Vijeth & Bonato, Graziela Vieira & Cabral, Patrícia Moraes & dos Santos, Rafaela Barreto & Cabeza, Roberto & Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & Boggio, Paulo Sérgio
November 2019, Volume 14, Issue 6
- 624-643 Learning to reason: The influence of instruction, prompts and scaffolding, metacognitive knowledge, and general intelligence on informal reasoning about everyday social and political issues
by Perkins, David
- 644-648 Descriptive norms for me, injunctive norms for you: Using norms to explain the risk gap
by Zou, Xi & Savani, Krishna
- 649-657 Reflection increases belief in God through self-questioning among non-believers
by Yilmaz, Onurcan & Isler, Ozan
- 658-670 Bullshit makes the art grow profounder
by Turpin, Martin Harry & Walker, Alexander C. & Kara-Yakoubian, Mane & Gabert, Nina N. & Fugelsang, Jonathan A. & Stolz, Jennifer A.
- 671-682 How the public, and scientists, perceive advancement of knowledge from conflicting study results
by Koehler, Derek J. & Pennycook, Gordon
- 683-695 Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers
by Collins, Robert N. & Mandel, David R.
- 696-710 Which grades are better, A’s and C’s, or all B’s? Effects of variability in grades on mock college admissions decisions
by Ahn, Woo-kyoung & Kim, Sunnie S. Y. & Kim, Kristen & McNally, Peter K.
- 711-720 Variations on anchoring: Sequential anchoring revisited
by Bahník, Štěpán & Houdek, Petr & Vrbová, Lucie & Hájek, Jiří
- 721-727 Wronging past rights: The sunk cost bias distorts moral judgment
by Meyers, Ethan A. & Białek, Michał & Fugelsang, Jonathan A. & Koehler, Derek J. & Friedman, Ori
- 728-738 The Lie Deflator – The effect of polygraph test feedback on subsequent (dis)honesty
by Peleg, Dar & Ayal, Shahar & Ariely, Dan & Hochman, Guy
- 739-751 Spanish validation of General Decision-Making Style scale: Sex invariance, sex differences and relationships with personality and coping styles
by Alacreu-Crespo, Adrián & Fuentes, María C. & Abad-Tortosa, Diana & Cano-Lopez, Irene & González, Esperanza & Serrano, Miguel Ángel
September 2019, Volume 14, Issue 5
- 535-546 An exploration of the motivational basis of take-some and give-some games
by Haesevoets, Tessa & Hiel, Alain Van & Assche, Jasper Van & Bostyn, Dries H. & Folmer, Chris Reinders
- 547-554 A hard to read font reduces the causality bias
by Díaz-Lago, Marcos & Matute, Helena
- 555-564 Decision conflict drives reaction times and utilitarian responses in sacrificial dilemmas
by Rosas, Alejandro & Bermúdez, Juan Pablo & Aguilar-Pardo, David
- 565-572 The glow of grime: Why cleaning an old object can wash away its value
by Levene, Merrick & Hu, Daisy Z. & Friedman, Ori
- 573-590 Limited resources or limited luck? Why people perceive an illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options despite unequivocal evidence for independence
by Marciano, Déborah & Krispin, Eden & Bourgeois-Gironde, Sacha & Deouell, Leon Y.
- 591-604 The role of cognitive reflection in decision making: Evidence from Pakistani managers
by Sajid, Muhammad & Li, Matthew C.
- 605-607 High-stakes hedges are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference”
by Newall, Philip W. S. & Cortis, Dominic
- 608-616 Bayesian and frequentist analysis of True and Error models
by Birnbaum, Michael H.
- 617-619 A response to Mandel’s (2019) commentary on Stastny and Lehner (2018)
by Lehner, Paul & Stastny, Bradley
- 620-623 Solving stumpers, CRT and CRAT: Are the abilities related?
by Bar-Hillel, Maya & Noah, Tom & Frederick, Shane
July 2019, Volume 14, Issue 4
- 381-394 Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times
by Konovalov, Arkady & Krajbich, Ian
- 395-411 A universal method for evaluating the quality of aggregators
by Han, Ying & Budescu, David
- 412-422 Right-wing ideology and numeracy: A perception of greater ability, but poorer performance
by Choma, Becky L. & Sumantry, David & Hanoch, Yaniv
- 423-439 Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment
by Leib, Margarita & Moran, Simone & Shalvi, Shaul
- 440-454 Political double standards in reliance on moral foundations
by Eriksson, Kimmo & Simpson, Brent & Strimling, Pontus
- 455-469 Beyond reach: Do symmetric changes in motor costs affect decision making? A registered report
by Zgonnikov, Arkady & Atiya, Nadim A. A. & O’Hora, Denis & Rañò, Iñaki & Wong-Lin, KongFatt
- 470-487 The robustness of anchoring effects on preferential judgments
by Yoon, Sangsuk & Fong, Nathan M. & Dimoka, Angelika
- 488-512 Information search in everyday decisions: The generalizability of the attraction search effect
by Scharf, Sophie E. & Wiegelmann, Monika & Bröder, Arndt
- 513-533 The decision paradoxes motivating Prospect Theory: The prevalence of the paradoxes increases with numerical ability
by Millroth, Philip & Nilsson, Håkan & Juslin, Peter
May 2019, Volume 14, Issue 3
- 223-233 Simple eye movement metrics can predict future decision making performance: The case of financial choices
by Król, Michał & Król, Magdalena Ewa
- 234-279 Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis
by Lilleholt, Lau
- 280-287 Terrorism, dread risk and bicycle accidents
by Ayton, Peter & Murray, Samantha & Hampton, James A.
- 288-292 Too soon to tell if the US intelligence community prediction market is more accurate than intelligence reports: Commentary on Stastny and Lehner (2018)
by Mandel, David R.
- 293-298 The endowment effect in the genes: An exploratory study
by Hou, Xingrong & Zeng, Jianmin & Chen, Hong & Su, Li
- 299-308 Sense of control matters: A long spatial distance leads to a short-term investment preference
by He, Miao & He, Guibing & Chen, Jiaxin & Wang, Yuan
- 309-317 The power of moral words: Loaded language generates framing effects in the extreme dictator game
by Capraro, Valerio & Vanzo, Andrea
- 318-334 Integrating theories of law obedience: How utility-theoretic factors, legitimacy, and lack of self-control influence decisions to commit low-level crimes
by de Puiseau, Berenike Waubert & Glöckner, Andreas & Towfigh, Emanuel V.
- 335-348 An exploratory investigation of the impact of evaluation context on ambiguity aversion
by Güney, Şule & Newell, Ben R.
- 349-363 Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do
by Schultze, Thomas & Mojzisch, Andreas & Schulz-Hardt, Stefan
- 364-372 Validation of Pre-Adolescent Decision-Making Competence in Turkish students
by Çevik, Yasemin Demiraslan & Doğan, Nuri & Dağhan, Gökhan & Mumcu, Filiz Kuşkaya & Somyürek, Sibel & Karaman, Haydar
- 373-380 From foe to friend and back again: The temporal dynamics of intra-party bias in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
by Dunham, Yarrow & Arechar, Antonio A. & Rand, David G.
March 2019, Volume 14, Issue 2
- 109-119 Finding meaning in the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit
by Walker, Alexander C. & Turpin, Martin Harry & Stolz, Jennifer A. & Fugelsang, Jonathan A. & Koehler, Derek J.
- 120-129 A reason-based explanation for moral dumbfounding
by Stanley, Matthew L. & Yin, Siyuan & Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter
- 130-134 Pill or bill? Influence of monetary incentives on the perceived riskiness and the ethical approval of clinical trials
by Hoffart, Janine & Scheibehenne, Benjamin
- 135-147 Are markets more accurate than polls? The surprising informational value of “just asking”
by Dana, Jason & Atanasov, Pavel & Tetlock, Philip & Mellers, Barbara
- 148-155 Intuition speed as a predictor of choice and confidence in point spread predictions
by Walker, Alexander C. & Turpin, Martin Harry & Fugelsang, Jonathan A. & Koehler, Derek J.
- 156-169 The link between intuitive thinking and social conservatism is stronger in WEIRD societies
by Yilmaz, Onurcan & Alper, Sinan
- 170-178 Do we de-bias ourselves?: The impact of repeated presentation on the bat-and-ball problem
by Raoelison, Matthieu & De Neys, Wim
- 179-186 Cross-cultural support for a link between analytic thinking and disbelief in God: Evidence from India and the United Kingdom
by Stagnaro, Michael N. & Ross, Robert M. & Pennycook, Gordon & Rand, David G.
- 187-198 How decision context changes the balance between cost and benefit increasing charitable donations
by Caserotti, Marta & Rubaltelli, Enrico & Slovic, Paul
- 199-213 Short-sighted greed? Focusing on the future promotes reputation-based generosity
by Sjåstad, Hallgeir
- 214-222 Can asymmetric subjective opportunity cost effect explain impatience in intertemporal choice? A replication study
by Shen, Si-Chu & Huang, Yuan-Na & Jiang, Cheng-Ming & Li, Shu
January 2019, Volume 14, Issue 1
- 1-10 Belief bias and representation in assessing the Bayesian rationality of others
by Anderson, Richard B. & Leventhal, Laura Marie & Zhang, Don C. & Fasko, Daniel & Basehore, Zachariah & Gamsby, Christopher & Branch, Jared & Patrick, Timothy
- 11-25 Welfare effects of nudges: The emotional tax of calorie menu labeling
by Thunström, Linda
- 26-39 Improving acceptability of nudges: Learning from attitudes towards opt-in and opt-out policies
by Yan, Haoyang & Yates, J. Frank
- 40-50 Do minorities like nudges? The role of group norms in attitudes towards behavioral policy
by Pe’er, Eyal & Feldman, Yuval & Gamliel, Eyal & Sahar, Limor & Tikotsky, Ariel & Hod, Nurit & Schupak, Hilla
- 51-57 The representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field experiment
by Krawczyk, Michał Wiktor & Rachubik, Joanna
- 58-71 Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience
by Olschewski, Sebastian & Dietsch, Marius & Ludvig, Elliot A.
- 72-79 The effect of limited availability on children’s consumption, engagement, and choice behavior
by Maimaran, Michal & Salant, Yuval
- 80-90 Thinking dispositions and cognitive reflection performance in schizotypy
by Broyd, Annabel & Ettinger, Ulrich & Thoma, Volker
- 91-98 The collective intelligence of random small crowds: A partial replication of Kosinski et al. (2012)
by Vercammen, Ans & Ji, Yan & Burgman, Mark
- 98-108 Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in soccer penalty shootouts
by Avugos, Simcha & Azar, Ofer H. & Gavish, Nadav & Sher, Eran & Bar-Eli, Michael
November 2018, Volume 13, Issue 6
- 501-508 Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
by Frederick, Shane & Levis, Amanda & Malliaris, Steven & Meyer, Andrew
- 509-513 Valuing bets and hedges
by Chatterjee, Subimal & Mookherjee, Satadruta
- 514-528 Children’s application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment
by Betsch, Tilmann & Lehmann, Anne & Jekel, Marc & Lindow, Stefanie & Glöckner, Andreas
- 529-546 Moderators of framing effects in variations of the Asian Disease problem: Time constraint, need, and disease type
by Diederich, Adele & Wyszynski, Marc & Ritov, Ilana
- 547-561 Who says “larger” and who says “smaller”? Individual differences in the language of comparison
by Skylark, William J. & Carr, Joseph M. & McComas, Claire L.
- 562-574 The impact of actively open-minded thinking on social media communication
by Carpenter, Jordan & Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel & Clark, Jenna & Flekova, Lucie & Smith, Laura & Kern, Margaret L. & Buffone, Anneke & Ungar, Lyle & Seligman, Martin
- 575-586 Why choose wisely if you have already paid? Sunk costs elicit stochastic dominance violations
by Jessup, Ryan K. & Assaad, Lily B. & Wick, Katherine
- 587-606 Boundary effects in the Marschak-Machina triangle
by Kontek, Krzysztof
- 607-621 Boosting intelligence analysts’ judgment accuracy: What works, what fails?
by Mandel, David R. & Karvetski, Christopher W. & Dhami, Mandeep K.
- 622-635 Bayesian methods for analyzing true-and-error models
by Lee, Michael D.
- 636-638 People respond to GM food with disgust more than fear: Comment on Royzman, Cusimano and Leeman (2017)
by Inbar, Yoel & Scott, Sydney E.
- 639-651 Measurement is the core disgust problem: Response to Inbar and Scott (2018)
by Cusimano, Corey & Royzman, Edward B. & Leeman, Robert F. & Metas, Stephen
September 2018, Volume 13, Issue 5
- 401-412 Different heuristics and same bias: A spectral analysis of biased judgments and individual decision rules
by Svenson, Ola & Gonzalez, Nichel & Eriksson, Gabriella
- 413-427 Randomization and serial dependence in professional tennis matches: Do strategic considerations, player rankings and match characteristics matter?
by Spiliopoulos, Leonidas
- 428-440 TEMAP2.R: True and Error model analysis program in R
by Birnbaum, Michael H. & Quispe-Torreblanca, Edika G.
- 441-450 Reversing the causal arrow: Incidence and properties of negative backward magical contagion in Americans
by Rozin, Paul & Dunn, Christopher & Fedotova, Natalie
- 451-457 Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making
by Białek, Michał & Fugelsang, Jonathan & Friedman, Ori
- 458-466 How far is the suffering? The role of psychological distance and victims’ identifiability in donation decisions
by Kogut, Tehila & Ritov, Ilana & Rubaltelli, Enrico & Liberman, Nira
- 467-470 Do discounts mitigate numerological superstitions? Evidence from the Russian real estate market
by Burakov, Dmitry
- 471-483 Time-varying risk behavior and prior investment outcomes: Evidence from Italy
by Lippi, Andrea & Barbieri, Laura & Piva, Mariacristina & De Bondt, Werner
- 484-500 Post-decision search in repeated and variable environments
by Teodorescu, Kinneret & Sang, Ke & Todd, Peter M.
July 2018, Volume 13, Issue 4
- 309-321 The boundary effect: Perceived post hoc accuracy of prediction intervals
by Teigen, Karl Halvor & Løhre, Erik & Hohle, Sigrid Møyner
- 322-333 Testing the ability of the surprisingly popular method to predict NFL games
by Lee, Michael D. & Danileiko, Irina & Vi, Julie
- 334-344 Predicting elections: Experts, polls, and fundamentals
by Graefe, Andreas
- 345-355 Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis
by Capraro, Valerio
- 356-371 Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
by Heck, Daniel W. & Thielmann, Isabel & Moshagen, Morten & Hilbig, Benjamin E.
- 372-381 Numerate decision makers don’t use more effortful strategies unless it pays: A process tracing investigation of skilled and adaptive strategy selection in risky decision making
by Traczyk, Jakub & Sobkow, Agata & Fulawka, Kamil & Kus, Jakub & Petrova, Dafina & Garcia-Retamero, Rocio
- 382-392 The role of character strengths in economic decision-making
by Jordan, Matthew R. & Rand, David G.
- 393-400 Validation of Adult Decision-Making Competence in Chinese college students
by Liang, Shujing & Zou, Yuwei
May 2018, Volume 13, Issue 3
- 217-236 Predictably intransitive preferences
by Butler, David J. & Pogrebna, Ganna
- 237-245 The impact of regret and worry on the threshold level of concern for flood insurance demand: Evidence from Dutch homeowners
by Robinson, Peter John & Botzen, W. J. Wouter
- 246-259 The non-effects of repeated exposure to the Cognitive Reflection Test
by Meyer, Andrew & Zhou, Elizabeth & Frederick, Shane
- 260-267 Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time
by Stagnaro, Michael N. & Pennycook, Gordon & Rand, David G.
- 268-274 Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?
by Gervais, Will M. & van Elk, Michiel & Xygalatas, Dimitris & McKay, Ryan T. & Aveyard, Mark & Buchtel, Emma E. & Dar-Nimrod, Ilan & Klocová, Eva Kundtová & Ramsay, Jonathan E. & Riekki, Tapani & Svedholm-Häkkinen, Annika M. & Bulbulia, Joseph
- 275-286 Reversing the endowment effect
by Pryor, Campbell & Perfors, Amy & Howe, Piers D. L.
- 287-296 Psychometric characteristics of two forms of the Slovak version of the Indecisiveness Scale
by Bavolar, Jozef
- 297-304 How should we think about Americans’ beliefs about economic mobility?
by Davidai, Shai & Gilovich, Thomas
- 305-308 Still no compelling evidence that Americans overestimate upward socio-economic mobility rates: Reply to Davidai & Gilovich (2018)
by Nero, Sondre S. & Swan, Lawton K. & Chambers, John R. & Heesacker, Martin
March 2018, Volume 13, Issue 2
- 150-162 Contamination, association, or social communication: An examination of alternative accounts for contagion effects
by Fedotova, Natalie O. & Rozin, Paul
- 163-169 Using Tversky’s contrast model to investigate how features of similarity affect judgments of likelihood
by Galesic, Mirta & Goode, A. Walkyria & Wallsten, Thomas S. & Norman, Kent L.
- 170-184 The category size bias: A mere misunderstanding
by Perfecto, Hannah & Nelson, Leif D. & Moore, Don A.
- 185-201 Weighted Brier score decompositions for topically heterogenous forecasting tournaments
by Merkle, Edgar C. & Hartman, Robert
- 202-211 Comparative evaluation of the forecast accuracy of analysis reports and a prediction market
by Stastny, Bradley J. & Lehner, Paul E.
- 212-216 Strategies using recent feedback lead to matching or maximising behaviours
by Cheng, Zhenbo & Gao, Jingying & Zhang, Leilei & Xiao, Gang & Mao, Hongjing
January 2018, Volume 13, Issue 1
- 1-22 Kenneth R. Hammond’s contributions to the study of judgment and decision making
by Dhami, Mandeep K. & Mumpower, Jeryl L.
- 23-32 Thinking dynamics and individual differences: Mouse-tracking analysis of the denominator neglect task
by Szaszi, Barnabas & Palfi, Bence & Szollosi, Aba & Kieslich, Pascal J. & Aczel, Balazs
- 33-41 The opportunity-threat theory of decision-making under risk
by Pandey, Mohan
- 42-60 Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America
by Fiedler, Susann & Hellmann, Dshamilja Marie & Dorrough, Angela Rachael & Glöckner, Andreas
- 61-72 Commitment-enhancing tools in Centipede games: Evidencing European–Japanese differences in trust and cooperation
by Krockow, Eva M. & Takezawa, Masanori & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M. & Smithers, Samuel & Kita, Toshimasa & Nakawake, Yo
- 73-78 A new test of the risk-reward heuristic
by Skylark, William J. & Prabhu-Naik, Sidharth
- 79-98 Stepwise training supports strategic second-order theory of mind in turn-taking games
by Verbrugge, Rineke & Meijering, Ben & Wierda, Stefan & van Rijn, Hedderik & Taatgen, Niels
- 99-111 Do the Right Thing: Experimental evidence that preferences for moral behavior, rather than equity or efficiency per se, drive human prosociality
by Capraro, Valerio & Rand, David G.
- 112-122 Learning psychology from riddles: The case of stumpers
by Bar-Hillel, Maya & Noah, Tom & Frederick, Shane
- 123-136 The Short Maximization Inventory
by Ďuriník, Michal & Procházka, Jakub & Cígler, Hynek
- 137-149 Making good cider out of bad apples — Signaling expectations boosts cooperation among would-be free riders
by Nagatsu, Michiru & Larsen, Karen & Karabegovic, Mia & Székely, Marcell & Mønster, Dan & Michael, John
November 2017, Volume 12, Issue 6
- 527-536 Numerosity and allocation behavior: Insights using the dictator game
by Shrivastava, Sunaina & Jain, Gaurav & Nayakankuppam, Dhananjay & Gaeth, Gary J. & Levin, Irwin P
- 537-552 Further evidence for the memory state heuristic: Recognition latency predictions for binary inferences
by Castela, Marta & Erdfelder, Edgar
- 553-562 ‘Tis better to choose and lose than to never choose at all
by Ashby, Nathaniel J. S. & Rakow, Tim & Yechiam, Eldad
- 563-571 Between me and we: The importance of self-profit versus social justifiability for ethical decision making
by Klein, Sina A. & Thielmann, Isabel & Hilbig, Benjamin E. & Zettler, Ingo
- 572-583 Are additives unnatural? Generality and mechanisms of additivity dominance
by Scott, Sydney E. & Rozin, Paul
- 584-595 Ambiguity and expectation-neglect in dilemmas of interpersonal trust
by Evans, Anthony M. & Krueger, Joachim I.
- 596-609 A novel approach to studying strategic decisions with eye-tracking and machine learning
by Krol, Michal & Krol, Magdalena
- 610-626 Accountability and adaptive performance under uncertainty: A long-term view
by Chang, Welton & Atanasov, Pavel & Patil, Shefali & Mellers, Barbara A. & Tetlock, Philip E.
- 627-641 Justifying the judgment process affects neither judgment accuracy, nor strategy use
by Hoffmann, Janina A. & Gaissmaier, Wolfgang & von Helversen, Bettina
September 2017, Volume 12, Issue 5
- 420-429 When your anchor sinks your boat: Information asymmetry in distributive negotiations and the disadvantage of making the first offer
by Maaravi, Yossi & Levy, Aharon
- 430-444 A Bayesian latent mixture model approach to assessing performance in stock-flow reasoning
by Kary, Arthur & Hawkins, Guy E. & Hayes, Brett K. & Newell, Ben R.
- 445-465 “I am uncertain” vs “It is uncertain”. How linguistic markers of the uncertainty source affect uncertainty communication
by Juanchich, Marie & Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie & Sirota, Miroslav
- 466-480 What lies beneath? Fear vs. disgust as affective predictors of absolutist opposition to genetically modified food and other new technologies
by Royzman, Edward & Cusimano, Corey & Leeman, Robert F.
- 481-490 Decisions in moral dilemmas: The influence of subjective beliefs in outcome probabilities
by Shou, Yiyun & Song, Fei
- 491-506 Measuring the relative contributions of rule-based and exemplar-based processes in judgment: Validation of a simple model
by Bröder, Arndt & Gräf, Michael & Kieslich, Pascal J.
- 507-515 How should we measure Americans’ perceptions of socio-economic mobility?
by Swan, Lawton K. & Chambers, John R. & Heesacker, Martin & Nero, Sondre S.
- 516-526 Vulnerable maximizers: The role of decision difficulty
by Kim, Kaeun & Miller, Elizabeth G.
July 2017, Volume 12, Issue 4
- 328-343 The relationship between crowd majority and accuracy for binary decisions
by Lee, Michael D. & Lee, Megan N.
- 344-368 FFTrees: A toolbox to create, visualize, and evaluate fast-and-frugal decision trees
by Phillips, Nathaniel D. & Neth, Hansjörg & Woike, Jan K. & Gaissmaier, Wolfgang
- 369-381 How generalizable is good judgment? A multi-task, multi-benchmark study
by Mellers, Barbara A. & Baker, Joshua D. & Chen, Eva & Mandel, David R. & Tetlock, Philip E.
- 382-395 Is broad bracketing always better? How broad decision framing leads to more optimal preferences over repeated gambles
by Webb, Elizabeth C. & Shu, Suzanne B.
- 396-407 When is it appropriate to reprimand a norm violation? The roles of anger, behavioral consequences, violation severity, and social distance
by Eriksson, Kimmo & Andersson, Per A. & Strimling, Pontus
- 408-414 The value of vulnerability: The transformative capacity of risky trust
by Bruni, Luigino & Tufano, Fabio
- 415-419 Order effects in the results of song contests: Evidence from the Eurovision and the New Wave
by Antipov, Evgeny A. & Pokryshevskaya, Elena B.
May 2017, Volume 12, Issue 3
- 198-207 To increase engagement, offer less: The effect of assortment size on children’s engagement
by Maimaran, Michal
- 208-223 It’s not fair: Folk intuitions about disadvantageous and advantageous inequity aversion
by Shaw, Alex & Choshen-Hillel, Shoham
- 224-235 How do individuals evaluate and respond to pro-equality decision makers? It depends on joint outcome and Social Value Orientation
by Zhang, Hong & Deng, Weijing & Zhu, Jiawei
- 236-252 Moral judgments of risky choices: A moral echoing effect
by Parkinson, Mary & Byrne, Ruth M. J.
- 253-259 Better is worse, worse is better: Reexamination of violations of dominance in intertemporal choice
by Jiang, Cheng-Ming & Sun, Hong-Mei & Zhu, Long-Fei & Zhao, Lei & Liu, Hong-Zhi & Sun, Hong-Yue
- 260-279 Establishing the relevance of non-compensatory choice algorithms from stated choice surveys – an exploration
by van de Kaa, Evert Jan
- 280-296 Is saving lives your task or God’s? Religiosity, belief in god, and moral judgment
by Barak-Corren, Netta & Bazerman, Max H.
- 297-307 Moral pluralism on the trolley tracks: Different normative principles are used for different reasons in justifying moral judgments
by Aktas, Büsra & Yilmaz, Onurcan & Bahçekapili, Hasan G.
- 308-313 It’s not right but it’s permitted: Wording effects in moral judgement
by Barbosa, Sergio & Jiménez-Leal, William
- 314-327 Perceptions of water systems
by Attari, Shahzeen Z. & Poinsatte-Jones, Kelsey & Hinton, Kelsey
March 2017, Volume 12, Issue 2
- 90-103 An IRT forecasting model: linking proper scoring rules to item response theory
by Emily Bo, Yuanchao & Budescu, David V. & Lewis, Charles & Tetlock, Philip E. & Mellers, Barbara
- 104-117 Strategies for exploration in the domain of losses
by Krueger, Paul M. & Wilson, Robert C. & Cohen, Jonathan D.
- 118-127 Hold on to it? An experimental analysis of the disposition effect
by Ploner, Matteo
- 128-139 Numeracy predicts preference consistency: Deliberative search heuristics increase choice consistency for choices from description and experience
by Ashby, Nathaniel J. S.
- 140-147 The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used
by Yilmaz, Onurcan & Saribay, S. Adil
- 148-167 Dual processes and moral conflict: Evidence for deontological reasoners’ intuitive utilitarian sensitivity
by Białek, Michal & Neys, Wim De
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/s/cup/judgdm2.html
