IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/oup/jconrs/v26y1999i2p156-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Responses to Information Incongruency in Advertising: The Role of Expectancy, Relevancy, and Humor

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Söderlund, Magnus & Rosengren, Sara, 2010. "The happy versus unhappy service worker in the service encounter:Assessing the impact on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 161-169.
  2. Rik Pieters & Luk Warlop & Michel Wedel, 2002. "Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 765-781, June.
  3. M. Mercanti-Guerin, 2008. "Perception d'une annonce créative par le consommateur: construction d'une échelle de mesure et impact sur le processus de persuasion publicitaire," Post-Print hal-02054971, HAL.
  4. Federico Mangiò & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Daniela Andreini & Lia Zarantonello, 2024. "How persuasive is woke brand communication on social media? Evidence from a consumer engagement analysis on Facebook," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(4), pages 345-381, July.
  5. Sylvain Sénéchal & Laurent Georges & Jean Pernin, 2014. "Alliances Between Corporate and Fair Trade Brands: Examining the Antecedents of Overall Evaluation of the Co-branded Product," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 365-381, October.
  6. Zhou, Lianxi & Poon, Patrick & Wang, Haizhong, 2015. "Consumers' reactions to global versus local advertising appeals: A test of culturally incongruent images in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 561-568.
  7. Cauberghe, Verolien & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2010. "The Effectiveness of Telescopic Ads Delivered Via Interactive Digital Television: The Impact of the Amount of Information and the Level of Interactivity on Brand Responses," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 297-308.
  8. Maria Mercanti-Guérin & Christophe Bezes, 2010. "La créativité publicitaire représente-t-elle un danger pour les marques ?," Post-Print hal-02056938, HAL.
  9. Mai, Robert & Hutter, Katharina, 2014. "Non-Linear Effects of Absurdity in Advertising," EconStor Preprints 96480, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  10. Latusi, Sabrina & Zerbini, Cristina & Maestripieri, Silvia & Luceri, Beatrice, 2017. "Wine Marketing: Consumer Persuasion Through The Region Of Origin," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260904, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  11. Loef, J. & Antonides, G. & van Raaij, W.F., 2001. "The Effectiveness of Advertising Matching Purchase Motivation," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-65-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  12. Sujo Thomas & Ashwin Jadeja & Krishnaba Vaghela & Richa Shreevastava, 2022. "Investigating the consumers attitude toward brand and purchase intention within the context of cause-related marketing campaign for a pharmacy product," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(4), pages 691-708, December.
  13. Moti Zwilling & Shalom Levy & Yaniv Gvili & Peter Dostal, 2020. "Machine learning as an effective paradigm for persuasive message design," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 1023-1045, June.
  14. Loef, J. & Antonides, G. & van Raaij, W.F., 2002. "The Role of Schema Salience in Ad Processing and Evaluation," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-15-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  15. Halkias, Georgios & Micevski, Milena & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Milchram, Christine, 2017. "Exploring the effectiveness of foreign brand communication: Consumer culture ad imagery and brand schema incongruity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 210-217.
  16. Hutter, Katharina & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2014. "Surprise, Surprise. Ambient Media as Promotion Tool for Retailers," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 93-110.
  17. K. P. Purnhagen & E. Herpen & S. Kamps & F. Michetti, 2021. "Oversized Area Indications on Bonus Packs Fail to Affect Consumers’ Transactional Decisions—More Experimental Evidence on the Mars Case," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 385-406, September.
  18. Georgios Halkias & Flora Kokkinaki, 2010. "Attention, Memory, and Evaluation of Schema Incongruent Brand Messages. An Empirical Study," Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena 032, University of Siena.
  19. Sabrina Latusi & Marcello Tedeschi & Cristina Zerbini, 2018. "Sexual stimuli in advertising: The opposite sex effect," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 115-130.
  20. Wisal Ahmed & Zahid Mahmood & Ayaz Ahmad, 2016. "Does Advertising Exposure Level Matter? Implications for Experimental Research in Advertising," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 8(2), pages 23-34, October.
  21. Braun-LaTour, Kathryn A. & Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Mast, Fred W., 2007. "Mood, information congruency, and overload," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 1109-1116, November.
  22. Chu, Kyounghee & Lee, Do-Hee & Kim, Ji Yoon, 2019. "The effect of verbal brand personification on consumer evaluation in advertising: Internal and external personification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 472-480.
  23. Gaëlle Pantin-Sohier & Caroline Lancelot Miltgen, 2012. "L'impact des stimuli informationnels d'un nouveau produit alimentaire sur les réactions affectives et cognitives du consommateur," Post-Print hal-01117036, HAL.
  24. Boujena, Othman & Ulrich, Isabelle & Piris, Yolande & Chicheportiche, Laëtitia, 2021. "Using food pictorial metaphor in the advertising of non-food brands: An exploratory investigation of consumer interpretation and affective response," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
  25. Tjaša Alegro & Maja Turnšek, 2020. "Striving to Be Different but Becoming the Same: Creativity and Destination Brands’ Promotional Videos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
  26. William K. Darley & Jeen-Su Lim, 2023. "Advertising creativity and its effects: a meta-analysis of the moderating role of modality," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 99-111, March.
  27. Lee, Michael S.W. & Septianto, Felix & Frethey-Bentham, Catherine & Gao, Esther, 2020. "Condoms and bananas: Shock advertising explained through congruence theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
  28. Wei, Yujie & Donthu, Naveen & Bernhardt, Kenneth L., 2013. "Effects of cognitive age, dispositional time perceptions, and time view manipulations on product attribute evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2171-2177.
  29. Pleyers, Gordy, 2021. "Shape congruence in product design: Impacts on automatically activated attitudes," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
  30. Yao Song & Yan Luximon, 2019. "Design for Sustainability: The Effect of Lettering Case on Environmental Concern from a Green Advertising Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.