IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/inm/ormnsc/v41y1995i5p909-926.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Price Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Régis Chenavaz & Corina Paraschiv & Gabriel Turinici, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing of New Products in Competitive Markets: A Mean-Field Game Approach," Working Papers hal-01592958, HAL.
  2. Liang Guo & Xiangyi Meng, 2015. "Digital Content Provision and Optimal Copyright Protection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1183-1196, May.
  3. Laussel, Didier & Van Long, Ngo & Resende, Joana, 2015. "Network effects, aftermarkets and the Coase conjecture: A dynamic Markovian approach," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 84-96.
  4. John Hauser & Gerard J. Tellis & Abbie Griffin, 2006. "Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 687-717, 11-12.
  5. Martin Spann & Marc Fischer & Gerard J. Tellis, 2015. "Skimming or Penetration? Strategic Dynamic Pricing for New Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 235-249, March.
  6. Qi Wang & Huazhong Zhao & Jinhong Xie, 2016. "Intra-Standard Competition: The Joint Impact of an Installed-User Base and a Supporting-Firm Base in Markets with Network Effects," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(3), pages 159-174, December.
  7. Fabio Manenti & Ernesto Somma, 2008. "One-Way Compatibility, Two-Way Compatibility and Entry in Network Industries," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 301-322.
  8. Amiya Basu & Tridib Mazumdar & S. P. Raj, 2003. "Indirect Network Externality Effects on Product Attributes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 209-221, April.
  9. Ming Hu & Zizhuo Wang & Yinbo Feng, 2020. "Information Disclosure and Pricing Policies for Sales of Network Goods," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1162-1177, July.
  10. Alexei Parakhonyak & Nick Vikander, 2019. "Optimal Sales Schemes for Network Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 819-841, February.
  11. Régis Chenavaz & Corina Paraschiv & Gabriel Turinici, 2021. "Dynamic Pricing of New Products in Competitive Markets: A Mean-Field Game Approach," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 463-490, September.
  12. Lange, Rense & McDade, Sean & Oliva, Terence A., 2001. "Technological choice and network externalities: a catastrophe model analysis of firm software adoption for competing operating systems," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 29-57, March.
  13. Chaab, Jafar & Zaccour, Georges, 2024. "Dynamic pricing in the presence of social externalities and reference-price effect," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
  14. Ho-Chyuan Chen & Chien-Chen Chen, 2011. "Compatibility Under Differentiated Duopoly with Network Externalities," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 43-55, March.
  15. Wei, Yuansheng & Huang, Pei, 2019. "A model of product compatibility introduction with consumer recognition," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 613-629.
  16. Ngo Long, 2015. "Dynamic Games Between Firms and Infinitely Lived Consumers: A Review of the Literature," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 467-492, December.
  17. Sanjay Jain, 2008. "Digital Piracy: A Competitive Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 610-626, 07-08.
  18. Leo Hove, 2014. "Metcalfe’s law: not so wrong after all," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, July.
  19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5855 is not listed on IDEAS
  20. Wenzhu Zhang & Yue Dai & Lin Tian, 2021. "Pricing strategies for competitive firms with indirect network effects," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 547-581, June.
  21. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2019. "Licensing to a competitor and strategic royalty choice in a dynamic duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 840-853.
  22. Jörn‐Henrik Thun & Jürgen Strohhecker, 2012. "Are We Surrounded by Penguins? The Diffusion of System Dynamics in Academia Analysed with System Dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 436-447, July.
  23. Chen, Jing & Grewal, Ravneet, 2013. "Competing in a supply chain via full-refund and no-refund customer returns policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 246-258.
  24. Tingting He & Dmitri Kuksov & Chakravarthi Narasimhan, 2012. "Intraconnectivity and Interconnectivity: When Value Creation May Reduce Profits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 587-602, July.
  25. Anton, Ramona & Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Paraschiv, Corina, 2023. "Dynamic pricing, reference price, and price-quality relationship," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
  26. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang, 2012. "Supply Chain Dynamics and Channel Efficiency in Durable Product Pricing and Distribution," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 327-343, April.
  27. Camp, Jean & Tsang, Rose, 2001. "Universal Service in a Ubiquitous Digital Network," Working Paper Series rwp01-006, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  28. Ting Zhu & Vishal Singh & Anthony J. Dukes, 2005. "Local Competition and Impact of Entry by a Dominant Retailer," CIE Discussion Papers 2005-05, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.
  29. Fatemeh Nosrat & William L. Cooper & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "Pricing for a product with network effects and mixed logit demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(2), pages 159-182, March.
  30. Frank Borowicz & Ewald Scherm, 2001. "Standardisierungsstrategien: Eine erweiterte Betrachtung des Wettbewerbs auf Netzeffektmärkten," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 391-416, June.
  31. Mason, Robin, 2000. "Network externalities and the Coase conjecture," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1981-1992, December.
  32. Xin Geng & Xiaomeng Guo & Guang Xiao, 2022. "Impact of Social Interactions on Duopoly Competition with Quality Considerations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 941-959, February.
  33. Ewald Scherm & Christian Maaß, 2006. "Zum Stellenwert der Netzwerkökonomik in der Strategie-/Marketingforschung —Eine Analyse empirischer Untersuchungen," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 27-46, March.
  34. José López-Sánchez & José Arroyo-Barrigüete & Domingo Ribeiro, 2008. "Development of a technological competition model in the presence of network effects from the modified law of Metcalfe," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 2(2), pages 83-98, June.
  35. Kaifu Zhang & Miklos Sarvary, 2015. "Differentiation with User-Generated Content," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 898-914, April.
  36. Hung-Ken Chien & C. Y. Cyrus Chu, 2008. "Sale or Lease? Durable-Goods Monopoly with Network Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1012-1019, 11-12.
  37. Xiaojing Liu, 2016. "Contracting for Competitive Supply Chains under Network Externalities and Demand Uncertainty," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-9, April.
  38. Goldenberg, Jacob & Libai, Barak & Muller, Eitan, 2010. "The chilling effects of network externalities," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 4-15.
  39. Ting Zhu & Vishal Singh & Anthony Dukes, 2011. "Local competition, entry, and agglomeration," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 129-154, June.
  40. Baohong Sun & Jinhong Xie & H. Henry Cao, 2004. "Product Strategy for Innovators in Markets with Network Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 243-254, October.
  41. Narayanan, V.K. & Chen, Tianxu, 2012. "Research on technology standards: Accomplishment and challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1375-1406.
  42. Dinah A. Vernik & Devavrat Purohit & Preyas S. Desai, 2011. "Music Downloads and the Flip Side of Digital Rights Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1011-1027, November.
  43. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
  44. Bhattacharya, Shantanu & Robotis, Andreas & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 2019. "Installed base management versus selling in monopolistic and competitive environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 596-607.
  45. Zhang, Jie & Chiang, Wei-yu Kevin, 2020. "Durable goods pricing with reference price effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  46. Boehm, Jonas & Bhargava, Hemant K. & Parker, Geoffrey G., 2020. "The Business of Electric Vehicles: A Platform Perspective," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 14(3), pages 203-323, December.
  47. Park, Sungwook & Kwon, Youngsun, 2023. "Disentangling the effects on OTT platform performance of three strategies: Pricing, M&As, and content investments," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).
  48. Yuxin Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2007. "Cross-Market Network Effect with Asymmetric Customer Loyalty: Implications for Competitive Advantage," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 52-66, 01-02.
  49. Sebastian Spaeth & Sven Niederhöfer, 2022. "Compatibility promotion between platforms: The role of open technology standards and giant platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1891-1915, December.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.