IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/jetheo/v51y1990i1p92-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Anonymous repeated games with a large number of players and random outcomes

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. David K. Levine & Andrea Mattozzi & Salvatore Modica, 2021. "Trade Associations: Why Not Cartels?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(1), pages 47-64, February.
  2. Frederico Finan & Laura Schechter, 2012. "Vote‐Buying and Reciprocity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 863-881, March.
  3. Barlo, Mehmet & Carmona, Guilherme, 2015. "Strategic behavior in non-atomic games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 134-144.
  4. Drew Fudenberg & David Levine & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2008. "When Are Nonanonymous Players Negligible?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Drew Fudenberg & David K Levine (ed.), A Long-Run Collaboration On Long-Run Games, chapter 6, pages 95-120, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
  5. Takuo Sugaya & Alexander Wolitzky, 2023. "Monitoring versus Discounting in Repeated Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(5), pages 1727-1761, September.
  6. Eric Friedman & Paul Resnick, 1998. "The Social Costs of Cheap Pseudonyms: fostering cooperation on the Internet," Departmental Working Papers 199820, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
  7. Yuki Kumagai, 2010. "Networks and Markets. The dynamic impacts of information, matching and transaction costs on trade," Discussion Papers 2010-07, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
  8. Ronen Gradwohl & Omer Reingold & Ariel Yadin & Amir Yehudayoff, 2009. "Players' Effects Under Limited Independence," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 971-980, November.
  9. Al-Najjar, Nabil I. & Smorodinsky, Rann, 2001. "Large Nonanonymous Repeated Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 26-39, October.
  10. Bodoh-Creed, Aaron, 2013. "Efficiency and information aggregation in large uniform-price auctions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(6), pages 2436-2466.
  11. Alessandro Marchesiani, 2024. "The essentiality of money in a trading post economy with random matching," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 823-836.
  12. Al-Najjar, Nabil I. & Smorodinsky, Rann, 2000. "Pivotal Players and the Characterization of Influence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 318-342, June.
  13. Aaron Bodoh-Creed & Brent Hickman, 2016. "College Assignment as a Large Contest," Working Papers 2016-27, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
  14. Piotr Więcek & Eitan Altman, 2015. "Stationary Anonymous Sequential Games with Undiscounted Rewards," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 686-710, August.
  15. Piotr Więcek, 2024. "Multiple-Population Discrete-Time Mean Field Games with Discounted and Total Payoffs: The Existence of Equilibria," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 997-1026, September.
  16. Al-Najjar, Nabil I., 2001. "A reputational model of authority," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 165-191, October.
  17. Jian Yang, 2021. "Analysis of Markovian Competitive Situations Using Nonatomic Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 184-216, March.
  18. Bodoh-Creed, Aaron L. & Hickman, Brent R., 2018. "College assignment as a large contest," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 88-126.
  19. Nabil I. Al-Najjar & Rann Smorodinsky, 1998. "Large Non-Anonymous Repeated Games," Discussion Papers 1250, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  20. Kalai, Ehud & Shmaya, Eran, 2018. "Large strategic dynamic interactions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 59-81.
  21. Guilherme Carmona, 2003. "A re-interpretation of the concept of nash equilibrium based on the notion of social institutions," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp425, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
  22. Yuki Kumagai, 2010. "Networks and Markets. The dynamic impacts of information, matching and transaction costs on trade," Discussion Papers 2010-07, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
  23. Carmona, Guilherme & Podczeck, Konrad, 2014. "Existence of Nash equilibrium in games with a measure space of players and discontinuous payoff functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 130-178.
  24. Alessandro Marchesiani, 2022. "The Essentiality of Money in a Trading Post Economy with Random Matching," Working Papers 202223, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
  25. Hamid Sabourian, 2000. "Bargaining and Markets: Complexity and the Walrasian Outcome," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1249, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
  26. Lorenzo Rocco, 2007. "Anonymity in nonatomic games," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 54(2), pages 225-247, June.
  27. Sabourian, Hamid, 2004. "Bargaining and markets: complexity and the competitive outcome," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 189-228, June.
  28. Sugaya, Takuo & Wolitzky, Alexander, 2023. "Bad apples in symmetric repeated games," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(4), November.
  29. Yuki Kumagai, 2009. "Networks and Markets: The dynamic impacts of information, matching and transaction costs on global trade," Discussion Papers 2009-22, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
  30. Jian Yang, 2017. "A link between sequential semi-anonymous nonatomic games and their large finite counterparts," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 383-433, May.
  31. Yuki Kumagai, 2009. "Networks and Markets: The dynamic impacts of information, matching and transaction costs on global trade," Discussion Papers 2009-22, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
  32. Guilherme Carmona, 2003. "A Re-Interpretation of Nash Equilibrium Based on the Notion of Social Institutions," Game Theory and Information 0311005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  33. Jian Yang, 2015. "A Link between Sequential Semi-anonymous Nonatomic Games and their Large Finite Counterparts," Papers 1510.06809, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2016.
  34. Jian Yang, 2015. "Analysis of Markovian Competitive Situations using Nonatomic Games," Papers 1510.06813, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2017.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.