On the theory of aggregation

Citations

Cited by:

1. Justin Kruger & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(3), pages 535-555, October.
   • Justin Kruger & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation," Post-Print hal-03347632, HAL.
2. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
   • Dietrich, Franz, 2006. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," MPRA Paper 58870, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2014.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01249513, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01249513, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Post-Print halshs-01249513, HAL.
   • Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2007. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
3. Stefano Vannucci, 2022. "Agenda manipulation-proofness, stalemates, and redundant elicitation in preference aggregation. Exposing the bright side of Arrow's theorem," Papers 2210.03200, arXiv.org.
4. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2007. "Strategy-Proof Judgment Aggregation," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 269-300, November.
   • Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0404007, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 31 Oct 2005.
   • Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 09, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
   • Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2007. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 5812, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
   • Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2005. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19299, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
5. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 441-466, March.
   • Christian List & Ben Polak, 2010. "Introduction to Judgment Aggregation," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1753, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
   • List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
   • Christian List & Ben Polak, 2010. "Introduction to Judgment Aggregation," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000006, David K. Levine.
6. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 873-911, April.
   • Dietrich, Franz, 2011. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," MPRA Paper 35657, University Library of Munich, Germany.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978027, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," Post-Print halshs-00978027, HAL.
7. John Craven, 2023. "Self-designation and group allocation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 121-133, January.
8. Dietrich, Franz, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 113-136.
   • Dietrich, Franz, 2013. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," MPRA Paper 51775, University Library of Munich, Germany.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Post-Print hal-01252817, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-01252817, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
9. Mongin, Philippe & Dietrich, Franz, 2011. "An interpretive account of logical aggregation theory," HEC Research Papers Series 941, HEC Paris.
   • Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
10. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    • Mongin, Philippe, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 37752, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Post-Print hal-00733521, HAL.
11. Christian List, 2007. "Group deliberation and the transformation ofjudgments: an impossibility result," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 26, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    • List, Christian, 2007. "Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
12. Susumu Cato, 2010. "Brief proofs of Arrovian impossibility theorems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(2), pages 267-284, July.
13. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 512-543, March.
    • Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
14. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    • Bozbay, I. & Dietrich, F.K. & Peters, H.J.M., 2011. "Judgement Aggregation in Search for the Truth," Research Memorandum 040, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    • Irem Bozbay & Franz Dietrich & Hans Peters, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Post-Print halshs-00978030, HAL.
    • Irem Bozbay & Franz Dietrich & Hans Peters, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978030, HAL.
    • Irem Bozbay & Franz Dietrich & Hans Peters, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978030, HAL.
15. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    • Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2005. "The impossibility of unbiased judgement aggregation," Research Memorandum 049, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    • Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2007. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Research Memorandum 022, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
16. Pivato, Marcus & Nehring, Klaus, 2010. "The McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation," MPRA Paper 22600, University Library of Munich, Germany.
17. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2019. "Strategy-proof aggregation rules and single peakedness in bounded distributive lattices," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 295-327, February.
18. Gilbert Laffond & Jean Lainé, 2014. "Triple-consistent social choice and the majority rule," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(2), pages 784-799, July.
    • Gilbert Laffond & Jean Laine, 2013. "Triple-Consistent Social Choice and the Majority Rule," Working Papers 201303, Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University.
19. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
20. Mario Szegedy & Yixin Xu, 2015. "Impossibility Theorems and the Universal Algebraic Toolkit," Papers 1506.01315, arXiv.org.
21. Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment aggregation," Working Papers hal-00579346, HAL.
    • Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00625434, HAL.
    • Mongin, Philippe, 2011. "Judgment aggregation," HEC Research Papers Series 942, HEC Paris.
22. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2008. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 15-39, June.
    • Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2006. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    • Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2007. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Research Memorandum 023, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
23. Kui Ou-Yang, 2018. "Generalized rawlsianism," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(2), pages 265-279, February.
24. Daniel Eckert & Christian Klamler, 2014. "A note on evaluating freedom of opinion," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(3), pages 1805-1813.
25. Conal Duddy & Ashley Piggins & William Zwicker, 2016. "Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(2), pages 301-333, February.
    • Duddy, Conal & Piggins, Ashley & Zwicker, William, 2014. "Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach," MPRA Paper 62071, University Library of Munich, Germany.
26. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: an oriented survey," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00504974, HAL.
    • Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    • Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories. An oriented survey," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00642167, HAL.
    • Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories. An oriented survey," Post-Print hal-00642167, HAL.
    • Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: an oriented survey," Post-Print halshs-00504974, HAL.
27. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 495-511, March.
28. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 544-561, March.
29. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2008. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 59-78, June.
    • Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0405003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
30. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01249513 is not listed on IDEAS
31. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2007. "Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 391-424, October.
    • Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Judgment aggregation by quota rules," Public Economics 0501005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
32. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2019. "Majority rule in the absence of a majority," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 213-257.
    • Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2013. "Majority rule in the absence of a majority," MPRA Paper 46721, University Library of Munich, Germany.
33. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2010. "Abstract Arrowian aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 467-494, March.
34. Peter Fishburn & Ariel Rubinstein, 1986. "Aggregation of equivalence relations," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 3(1), pages 61-65, March.
35. Stefano Vannucci, 2019. "Majority judgment and strategy-proofness: a characterization," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(3), pages 863-886, September.
36. Duddy, Conal & Piggins, Ashley, 2013. "Many-valued judgment aggregation: Characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 793-805.
37. Franz Dietrich, 2007. "A generalised model of judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 28(4), pages 529-565, June.
    • Franz Dietrich, 2005. "Judgment aggregation in general logics," Public Economics 0505007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
38. Josep Freixas & Montserrat Pons, 2021. "On anonymous and weighted voting systems," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 477-491, November.
39. Herzberg, Frederik & Eckert, Daniel, 2012. "The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: Impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 41-47.
40. Elad Dokow & Ron Holzman, 2009. "Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(2), pages 221-241, February.