IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/jeeman/v20y1991i2p163-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Bioeconomics of sustainable harvest of competing species

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2009. "Bioeconomies of scope and the discard problem in multiple-species fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 72-92, July.
  2. Yajie Liu & Jon Olaf Olaussen & Anders Skonhoft, 2011. "When a Fish is a Fish: The Economic Impacts of Escaped Farmed Fish," Working Paper Series 12011, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
  3. Moberg, Emily A. & Pinsky, Malin L. & Fenichel, Eli P., 2019. "Capital Investment for Optimal Exploitation of Renewable Resource Stocks in the Age of Global Change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
  4. Brock, W. A. & Xepapadeas, A., 2004. "Management of interacting species: regulation under nonlinearities and hysteresis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 137-156, June.
  5. Christine Bertram & Martin F. Quaas, 2017. "Biodiversity and Optimal Multi-species Ecosystem Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(2), pages 321-350, June.
  6. repec:hal:journl:hal-04793204 is not listed on IDEAS
  7. Guillaume Bataille, 2024. "An Explicit Solution to Harvesting Behaviors in a Predator-Prey System," AMSE Working Papers 2405, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
  8. N. Quérou & A. Tomini, 2018. "Marine Ecosystem Considerations and Second-Best Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 381-401, June.
  9. Frésard, Marjolaine & Ropars-Collet, Carole, 2014. "Sustainable harvest of a native species and control of an invasive species: A bioeconomic model of a commercial fishery invaded by a space competitor," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-11.
  10. B. N. Obegi & I. Sarfo & G. N. Morara & P. Boera & E. Waithaka & A. Mutie, 2020. "Bio-economic modeling of fishing activities in Kenya: the case of Lake Naivasha Ramsar site," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 15-31, April.
  11. Bella, Giovanni, 2007. "A Bug's Life: Competition Among Species Towards the Environment," Natural Resources Management Working Papers 10269, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  12. Eppink, Florian V. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2007. "Ecological theories and indicators in economic models of biodiversity loss and conservation: A critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 284-293, March.
  13. Nicolas Querou & Agnès Tomini, 2014. "Ecosystem considerations in a second-best world," Post-Print hal-01123390, HAL.
  14. Carl-Erik Schulz, 1996. "Trade policy and ecology," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(1), pages 15-38, July.
  15. Ola Flaaten & Kenneth Stollery, 1996. "The economic costs of biological predation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(1), pages 75-95, July.
  16. Stahn, Hubert & Tomini, Agnès, 2017. "On conjunctive management of groundwater and rainwater," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 186-200.
  17. Gakkhar, Sunita & Gupta, Komal, 2016. "A three species dynamical system involving prey–predation, competition and commensalism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 54-67.
  18. Finnoff, David & Tschirhart, John, 2003. "Harvesting in an eight-species ecosystem," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 589-611, May.
  19. Kateregga, Eseza & Sterner, Thomas, 2008. "Lake Victoria Fish Stocks and the Effects of Water Hyacinths on the Catchability of Fish," RFF Working Paper Series dp-08-05-efd, Resources for the Future.
  20. Potts, Matthew D. & Vincent, Jeffrey R., 2008. "Harvest and extinction in multi-species ecosystems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 336-347, April.
  21. Stephen Kasperski, 2015. "Optimal Multi-species Harvesting in Ecologically and Economically Interdependent Fisheries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(4), pages 517-557, August.
  22. Tibor Neugebauer, 2005. "Bioeconomics Of Sustainable Harvest Of Competing Species: A Comment," Others 0503012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  23. Bertram, Christine, 2010. "Integrating biodiversity indices into a multi-species optimal control model," Kiel Working Papers 1662, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  24. David Finnoff & John Tschirhart, 2003. "Protecting an Endangered Species While Harvesting Its Prey in a General Equilibrium Ecosystem Model," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(2), pages 160-180.
  25. Fresard, Marjolaine & Boncoeur, Jean, 2006. "Controlling the Biological Invasion of a Commercial Fishery by a Space Competitor: A Bioeconomic Model with Reference to the Bay of St-Brieuc Scallop Fishery," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 35(1), pages 1-20, April.
  26. Barbier, Edward B., 2001. "A note on the economics of biological invasions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 197-202, November.
  27. Giovanni Bella, 2007. "A Bug’s Life: Competition Among Species Towards the Environment," Working Papers 2007.18, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  28. Brodie, Jedediah F., 2018. "Carbon Costs and Bushmeat Benefits of Hunting in Tropical Forests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 22-26.
  29. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2007. "Economies of Scope in the Management of Mulitple Species Fisheries," Working Papers 7348, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.