IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/bla/bstrat/v15y2006i4p275-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Accessibility and functionality of the corporate web site: implications for sustainability reporting

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Luisa Bosetti, 2015. "Engaging stakeholders through Facebook. The case of Global Compact LEAD participants," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 3005158, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  2. Benjamin Karatzoglou & Ioannis Spilanis, 2010. "Sustainable tourism in Greek islands: the integration of activity‐based environmental management with a destination environmental scorecard based on the adaptive resource management paradigm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 26-38, January.
  3. Samara López-Ruiz & Nazaret Ibáñez-Rueda & Jorge Guardiola & Francisco González-Gómez, 2023. "Does the Ownership of Water Utilities Influence Water-Saving Advice Provided to Service Users? An Analysis of the Spanish Water Sector," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(8), pages 3299-3318, June.
  4. Azlan Amran & Say Keat Ooi & Riduan Toani Mydin & S. Susela Devi, 2015. "The Impact of Business Strategies on Online Sustainability Disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 551-564, September.
  5. Venturelli, Andrea & Ligorio, Lorenzo & de Nuccio, Elbano, 2023. "Biodiversity accountability in water utilities: A case study," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  6. Muhammad Asif & Cory Searcy & Paulo dos Santos & David Kensah, 2013. "A Review of Dutch Corporate Sustainable Development Reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 321-339, November.
  7. Giorgio Mion, 2020. "Organizations with Impact? A Study on Italian Benefit Corporations Reporting Practices and Reporting Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
  8. Agostino Vollero & Alfonso Siano & Maria Palazzo & Sara Amabile, 2020. "Hoftsede's cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility in online communication: Are they independent constructs?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 53-64, January.
  9. Gonçalves, Tiago & Gaio, Cristina & Costa, Eva, 2020. "Committed vs opportunistic corporate and social responsibility reporting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 417-427.
  10. Jorge Arevalo, 2010. "Critical Reflective Organizations: An Empirical Observation of Global Active Citizenship and Green Politics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 299-316, October.
  11. J. Emil Morhardt, 2010. "Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(7), pages 436-452, November.
  12. Chaohong Na & Xue Chen & Xiaojun Li & Yuting Li & Xiaolan Wang, 2022. "Digital Transformation of Value Chains and CSR Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
  13. Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E. & Claasen, Cyrlene, 2017. "Fuzzy reporting as a way for a company to greenwash: perspectives from the Colombian reality," MPRA Paper 85472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  14. Shenshen Zhang, 2024. "The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance and the moderation of mixed‐ownership reform: The evidence from Chinese state‐owned enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2195-2210, May.
  15. Julia Catharina Jensen & Nicola Berg, 2012. "Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 299-316, July.
  16. Matias Laine, 2009. "Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(7), pages 1029-1054, September.
  17. Gianpaolo Tomaselli & Monia Melia, 2014. "The Role Of Interactive Technologies For Csr Communication," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 8(1), pages 324-340.
  18. Irja Vormedal & Audun Ruud, 2009. "Sustainability reporting in Norway – an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio‐political drivers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 207-222, May.
  19. Paolo Esposito & Paolo Ricci, 2021. "Cultural organizations, digital Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholder engagement in virtual museums: a multiple case study. How digitization is influencing the attitude toward CSR," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 953-964, March.
  20. Nor Bahiyah Omar & Azlan Amran, 2017. "Corporate Governance and Climate Change Reporting in Malaysia," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(12), pages 222-240, December.
  21. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Víctor Amor-Esteban & David Galindo-Álvarez, 2020. "Communication Strategies for the 2030 Agenda Commitments: A Multivariate Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
  22. Tareq O Bani-Khalid, 2019. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A longitudinal Analysis of its Evolutionary Pattern," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(3), pages 17-23, July.
  23. Azleen Ilias & Mohd Zulkeflee Abd Razak & Rahida Abdul Rahman, 2015. "The Quality of Non-Financial Information on Internet Business Reporting for Malaysian Public Listed Companies (PLCs)," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 1(4), pages 165-175.
  24. Wendy Stubbs & Colin Higgins & Markus Milne, 2013. "Why Do Companies Not Produce Sustainability Reports?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(7), pages 456-470, November.
  25. Hina Ismail & Muhammad A. Saleem & Sadaf Zahra & Muhammad S. Tufail & Rao Akmal Ali, 2021. "Application of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Principles for Measuring Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
  26. Laura Sierra‐García & Ana Zorio‐Grima & María A. García‐Benau, 2015. "Stakeholder Engagement, Corporate Social Responsibility and Integrated Reporting: An Exploratory Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5), pages 286-304, September.
  27. Alfonso Siano & Francesca Conte & Sara Amabile & Agostino Vollero & Paolo Piciocchi, 2016. "Communicating Sustainability: An Operational Model for Evaluating Corporate Websites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
  28. Beck, A. Cornelia & Campbell, David & Shrives, Philip J., 2010. "Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 207-222.
  29. Matthias S. Fifka, 2013. "Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-35, January.
  30. Patricia Milanés Montero & Pérez Calderón Esteban & Ortega Rossel Francisco Javier, 2012. "Factores determinantes del nivel de compromiso medioambiental," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(4), pages 197-233, octubre-d.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.