IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbsse/fsii99301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gewinnt soviel Ihr könnt! Entscheidungsverhalten in Intergruppenkonflikten - Eine experimentelle Untersuchung von Entrapment-Strategien

Author

Listed:
  • Fietkau, Hans-Joachim
  • Trénel, Matthias

Abstract

Entscheidungen in informellen politischen Verfahren (z.B. Mediation) sind durch komplexe Interaktionen zwischen Gruppen und durch eine relative Offenheit in der Wahl der verfolgten Ziele und Interaktionsmuster durch die Beteiligten gekennzeichnet. Herkömmliche experimentelle Analysen von Entscheidungsprozessen bilden dies nur bedingt ab. Die Studie dient vorrangig der Entwicklung einer Forschungsmethodik: Mit Hilfe des gruppendynamischen Entscheidungsspiels Gewinnt soviel ihr könnt! wurde eine in dieser Hinsicht repräsentativere experimentelle Situation erzeugt. Untersucht wurden Entrapment-Strategien. Hierbei handelt es sich um ein Entscheidungsmuster, in dem Menschen oder Gruppen trotz erkennbarer eigener Verluste ihr Verhalten nicht ändern. Es wurde bei vielen politischen Fehlentscheidungen beobachtet. Ein besseres Verständnis dieses Phänomens könnte einen Betrag zur konstruktiven Gestaltung politischer Entscheidungsprozesse leisten. In der Untersuchung konnten (neben anderen Entscheidungsmustern) Entrapment-Strategien bei Intergruppenentscheidungen mit Hilfe des genannten Spiels realisiert werden. Es ließ sich zeigen, daß bei den Spielteilnehmern Einschränkungen in der Wahrnehmung von Zieloptionen und Kooperationsmöglichkeiten existierten. Bei Teilgruppen mit Entrapment-Strategien wurde trotz einer Eskalation der Verluste eine relative Zufriedenheit mit ihrer Entscheidungsfindung innerhalb der Teilgruppe festgestellt.

Suggested Citation

  • Fietkau, Hans-Joachim & Trénel, Matthias, 1999. "Gewinnt soviel Ihr könnt! Entscheidungsverhalten in Intergruppenkonflikten - Eine experimentelle Untersuchung von Entrapment-Strategien," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Standard-setting and Environment FS II 99-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbsse:fsii99301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/48974/1/312920407.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Whyte, Glen, 1993. "Escalating Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Prospect Theory Approach," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 430-455, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meloria Meschi & Carla Pace, 2012. "Accounting for Behavioral Biases for Non-biased Demand Estimations," Chapters, in: Michael A. Crew & Paul R. Kleindorfer (ed.), Multi-Modal Competition and the Future of Mail, chapter 24, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Peter A. F. Fraser‐Mackenzie & Tiejun Ma & Ming‐Chien Sung & Johnnie E. V. Johnson, 2019. "Let's Call it Quits: Break‐Even Effects in the Decision to Stop Taking Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1560-1581, July.
    3. Daniel Friedman & Kai Pommerenke & Rajan Lukose & Garrett Milam & Bernardo Huberman, 2007. "Searching for the sunk cost fallacy," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(1), pages 79-104, March.
    4. Florian Heine & Martin Sefton, 2018. "To Tender or Not to Tender? Deliberate and Exogenous Sunk Costs in a Public Good Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Thatcher, Andrew & Vasconcelos, Ana C. & Ellis, David, 2015. "An investigation into the impact of information behaviour on information failure: The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power disaster," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 57-63.
    6. Duxbury, Darren, 2012. "Sunk costs and sunk benefits: A re-examination of re-investment decisions," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 144-156.
    7. Anne Sibert, 2006. "Central Banking by Committee," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 145-168, August.
    8. Chi, T. & Nystrom, P. C., 1995. "Decision dilemmas facing managers: recognizing the value of learning while making sequential decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 303-312, June.
    9. Maximilian Rüdisser & Raphael Flepp & Egon Franck, 2017. "Do casinos pay their customers to become risk-averse? Revising the house money effect in a field experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 20(3), pages 736-754, September.
    10. Heine, Florian, 2017. "Contests for public goods," Other publications TiSEM aa1ff79c-5412-4630-87a0-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Wennberg, Karl & Delmar, Frédéric & McKelvie, Alexander, 2016. "Variable risk preferences in new firm growth and survival," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 408-427.
    12. Whyte, Glen & Sebenius, James K., 1997. "The Effect of Multiple Anchors on Anchoring in Individual and Group Judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 74-85, January.
    13. Dumas, Jean-Malik, 2016. "Essays in behavioral strategy," Other publications TiSEM a04c1b1b-eeed-48ad-894b-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Bradley R. Staats & Diwas S. KC & Francesca Gino, 2018. "Maintaining Beliefs in the Face of Negative News: The Moderating Role of Experience," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 804-824, February.
    15. Michael A. Crew & Paul R. Kleindorfer (ed.), 2012. "Multi-Modal Competition and the Future of Mail," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14533.
    16. Rau, Holger A., 2015. "The disposition effect in team investment decisions: Experimental evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 272-282.
    17. Hoelzl, Erik & Loewenstein, George, 2005. "Wearing out your shoes to prevent someone else from stepping into them: Anticipated regret and social takeover in sequential decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 15-27, September.
    18. Edwards, Kimberley D., 1996. "Prospect theory: A literature review," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 19-38.
    19. Fochmann, Martin & Fochmann, Nadja & Kocher, Martin G. & Müller, Nadja, 2021. "Dishonesty and risk-taking: Compliance decisions of individuals and groups," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 250-286.
    20. Gowdy, John M., 2008. "Behavioral economics and climate change policy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(3-4), pages 632-644, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbsse:fsii99301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.