IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzboem/fsi01102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Internationalisierung: Ausgangspunkt einer Neuformierung der Geschlechterverhältnisse in der Unternehmensberatung?

Author

Listed:
  • Rudolph, Hedwig
  • Theobald, Hildegard
  • Quack, Sigrid

Abstract

The paper conceptualises processes of economic internationalisation as strong triggers for restructuration. The branch of business consultancies, a knowledge intensive service activity with recently expanding employment of women, is taken as an example to document and analyse rearrangements both of the sector and inside the companies that are related to the trends of internationalisation. A survey of empirical studies indicates processes of continuity as well as of change in gender relations (although the state of the art - in Germany and internationally - is full of gaps). Thus the sector of business consultancies confirms the more general results of feminist research: It is an open question whether social change will decrease or increase the relevance of gender relations. Moreover, 'difference' may or may not be transformed into discrimination. This is why the paper winds up with a strong argument for contextualising concepts for empirical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudolph, Hedwig & Theobald, Hildegard & Quack, Sigrid, 2001. "Internationalisierung: Ausgangspunkt einer Neuformierung der Geschlechterverhältnisse in der Unternehmensberatung?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 01-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzboem:fsi01102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44067/1/353636088.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin Fincham, 1999. "The Consultant–Client Relationship: Critical Perspectives on the Management of Organizational Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 335-351, May.
    2. Theobald, Hildegard, 1999. "Geschlecht, Qualifikation und Wohlfahrtsstaat: Deutschland und Schweden im Vergleich," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 122882, February.
    3. Schaefer, James & Zimmer, Michael, 1995. "Gender and earnings of certain accountants and auditors: A comparative study of industries and regions," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 265-291.
    4. Kuhlmann, Ellen & Matthies, Hildegard & Oppen, Maria & Simon, Dagmar, 2000. "Der Wissenschaftsbetrieb als Arena der Geschlechterdifferenzierung: Arbeitsstrukturierung und Arbeitsinteressen in außeruniversitären Forschungsinstituten," Discussion Papers, various Research Units P 00-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    5. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Krebsbach-Gnath, Camilla, 1998. "Consultants as agents of organizational learning: the importance of marginality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 98-109, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Armstrong, Peter, 1985. "Changing management control strategies: The role of competition between accountancy and other organisational professions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 129-148, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rudolph, Hedwig, 2004. "Beyond the token status: Women in business consultancies in Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Internationalization and Organization SP III 2004-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Himick, Darlene, 2016. "Actuarialism as biopolitical and disciplinary technique," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 22-44.
    2. Caroline Lambert & Éric Pezet, 2007. "Discipliner les autres et agir sur soi:la double vie du contrôleur de gestion," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 10(1), pages 183-208, March.
    3. Walker, Stephen P., 2000. "Benign sacerdotalist or pious assailant. The rise of the professional accountant in British management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 313-323, April.
    4. Donald R. Epley, 2001. "US Real Estate Agent Income and Commercial/Investment Activities," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 21(3), pages 221-244.
    5. Ben Khaled, Wafa & Gérard, Benoît & Farjaudon, Anne-Laure, 2022. "Analysis of the political and identity dynamics of a dominant mode of control: The case of business ethics control and its legalization," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Nicolas Berland & Trevor Boyns, 2002. "The development of budgetary control in France and Britain from the 1920s to the 1960s: a comparison," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 329-356.
    7. Velayutham, Sivakumar & Perera, Hector, 1996. "Recent developments in the accounting profession in New Zealand: A case of deprofessionalization?," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 445-462.
    8. Gleadle, Pauline & Cornelius, Nelarine, 2008. "A case study of financialization and EVA®," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1219-1238.
    9. Pemer, Frida & Börjeson, Love & Werr, Andreas, 2014. "Government agencies’ use of management consulting services in Sweden – an explorative study," SSE Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2014:3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    10. Ramirez, Carlos & Zicari, Adrián, 2024. "Between a corporatist past and a globalised future: Argentina's accounting profession and the social balance sheet," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Michela Arnaboldi & Irvine Lapsley, 2010. "Asset management in cities: polyphony in action?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 392-419, March.
    12. Hlaciuc Elena & Socoliuc Marian, 2009. "Considerations Regarding The Accounting Profession In Europe - Competitiveness And Professional Ethics," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 991-994, May.
    13. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Rogers, Rodney K., 2005. "Financial analysts' reports: an extended institutional theory evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 331-356, May.
    14. Daniel Muzio & David M. Brock & Roy Suddaby, 2013. "Professions and Institutional Change: Towards an Institutionalist Sociology of the Professions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 699-721, July.
    15. Alaric Bourgoin & Fabian Muniesa, 2012. "Making a consultancy slideshow 'rock solid': a study of pragmatic efficacy," Working Papers halshs-00702224, HAL.
    16. Mihret, Dessalegn Getie, 2014. "How can we explain internal auditing? The inadequacy of agency theory and a labor process alternative," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 771-782.
    17. Hall, Matthew & Mikes, Anette & Millo, Yuval, 2015. "How do risk managers become influential?: a field study of toolmaking in two financial institutions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60485, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Hanlon, Gerard, 2010. "Knowledge, risk and Beck: Misconceptions of expertise and risk," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 211-220.
    19. Kotb, Amr & Roberts, Clare & Sian, S., 2012. "E-business audit: Advisory jurisdiction or occupational invasion?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 468-482.
    20. Kristof van Assche & Raoul Beunen & Stefan Verweij, 2020. "Comparative Planning Research, Learning, and Governance: The Benefits and Limitations of Learning Policy by Comparison," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 11-21.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzboem:fsi01102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.