IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wtowps/ersd201815.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender-related provisions in regional trade agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Monteiro, José-Antonio

Abstract

Regional Trade agreements (RTAs) are sometimes viewed as laboratories in which new types of provisions are negotiated to address recent trade-related issues and challenges. A detailed analysis of 556 RTAs, including 292 agreements currently in force and notified to the WTO (as of November 2018), shows that although the inclusion of gender-related provisions in RTAs is not a recent phenomenon, a limited but increasing number of RTAs, namely 74 agreements, refer explicitly to gender-related issues. These gender-related provisions are highly heterogeneous and differ in terms of location in the RTA, language, scope and commitments. Most gender-related provisions are found in a single or couple of RTAs and couched in best endeavour language. In the last three years, a limited number of RTAs have expanded significantly the scope of gender-related provisions by establishing a dedicated article or chapter on trade and gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Monteiro, José-Antonio, 2018. "Gender-related provisions in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2018-15, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wtowps:ersd201815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/191640/1/1047566001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helpman, Elhanan, 1987. "Imperfect competition and international trade : Opening remarks," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-2), pages 77-81.
    2. Helpman, Elhanan, 1987. "Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 62-81, March.
    3. Damian Raess & Dora Sari, 2018. "Labor Provisions in Trade Agreements (LABPTA): Introducing a New Dataset," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(4), pages 451-466, November.
    4. Monteiro, José-Antonio, 2016. "Typology of environment-related provisions in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2016-13, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renata Vargas Amaral & Lillyana Daza Jaller, . "The role of regulation and MNEs in ensuring equal opportunities for women," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    2. Fatima Olanike Kareem & Olayinka Idowu Kareem, 2021. "Employment Responses to EU Food Safety Regulations: A Gendered Perspective," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(6), pages 1899-1929, December.
    3. Monteiro, José-Antonio, 2021. "The evolution of gender-related provisions in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2021-8, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    4. Monteiro, José-Antonio, 2021. "Buena vista: Social corporate responsibility provisions in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2021-11, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert C. Feenstra, 1998. "Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 31-50, Fall.
    2. Tamer Afifi, 2006. "Institutional Reform: a Step Towards Free Trade in Egypt," EcoMod2006 272100001, EcoMod.
    3. J. Peter Neary, 2009. "Putting the “New” into New Trade Theory: Paul Krugman's Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 111(2), pages 217-250, June.
    4. Peter H. Egger & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2013. "The Pure Effects of European Integration on Intra-EU Core and Periphery Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 701-712, June.
    5. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2013. "Innis Lecture: What separates us? Sources of resistance to globalization," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 1196-1231, November.
    6. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Sova, Anamaria & Sova, Robert, 2015. "Trade flows and trade specialisation: The case of China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 261-273.
    7. Rebecca Neumann & Saleh S. Tabrizy, 2021. "Exchange Rates and Trade Balances: Effects of Intra-Industry Trade and Vertical Specialization," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 613-647, July.
    8. Kumar Gaurav & Nalin Bharti, 2019. "Some Common Lessons from Uncommon FTAs," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 20(1), pages 138-157, March.
    9. Zeynalov, Ayaz, 2014. "The Gravity of Institutions in Resource-Rich Country," MPRA Paper 60943, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Jeffrey Sachs & Xiaokai Yang & Dingsheng Zhang, 2005. "Pattern Of Trade And Economic Development In A Model Of Monopolistic Competition," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: An Inframarginal Approach To Trade Theory, chapter 10, pages 185-221, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Ayaz Zeynalov, 2017. "The gravity of institutions in a resource-rich country: the case of Azerbaijan," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 239-261, April.
    12. Peneder, Michael & Rammer, Christian (ed.), 2018. "Measuring Competitiveness," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 181906.
    13. Ogura, Yasuhiro, 2020. "Policy as a “porter” of RE component export or import? Evidence from PV/wind energy in OECD and BRICS," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Antonella Bellino & Giuseppe Celi, 2016. "The Role of Migration in the Variety and Quality of Trade: Evidence from Germany," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, February.
    15. Muhammad Imtiaz Subhani & Amber Osman & Rabia Khokhar, 2011. "The new version of gravity model in explaining bilateral trade. “A comparative study for developed and developing nations”," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 28, pages 41-54, May.
    16. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1993. "Is Japan Creating a Yen Bloc in East Asia and the Pacific?," NBER Chapters, in: Regionalism and Rivalry: Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia, pages 53-88, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Robert Kelm, 2016. "Eksport, import i kurs złotego: 2000−2014," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 47(6), pages 585-620.
    18. Brander, James A. & Spencer, Barbara J., 2015. "Intra-industry trade with Bertrand and Cournot oligopoly: The role of endogenous horizontal product differentiation," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 157-165.
    19. Lingduo Jiang & Shuangshuang Liu & Guofeng Zhang, 2022. "Digital trade barriers and export performance: Evidence from China," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 88(4), pages 1401-1430, April.
    20. Purba Mukerji & Arvind Panagariya, 2019. "Investigating the composition of product-level specialization," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 3-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional Trade Agreements; Gender; Women;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wtowps:ersd201815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wtoerch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.