IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tuedps/6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ordnungspolitische Defizite des GATT

Author

Listed:
  • Molsberger, Josef
  • Kotios, Angelos

Abstract

Zur Überwindung der Defizite des GATT bedarf es einer konsistenten internationalen Ordnungspolitik. Sie setzt ordnungspolitische Reformen in der Binnenwirtschaftspolitik der GATT-Staaten voraus. Weitere Elemente der GATT-Reform könnten sein: Eine striktere Durchsetzung der GATTBestimmungen, z.B. durch Übernahme liberaler völkerrechtlicher Regeln in die nationalen Rechtsordnungen; die Zurückdrängung des Einflusses protektionistischer Interessengruppen; die Abschaffung der sektoralen Sonderregime und die Überarbeitung und Ausweitung der GATT-Bestimmungen. Ansätze zu einer ordnungspolitischen Reform enthält das Programm der 1986 eröffneten Uruguay-Runde des GATT. Die Erfolgsaussichten dieser Verhandlungen sind noch unbestimmt.

Suggested Citation

  • Molsberger, Josef & Kotios, Angelos, 1990. "Ordnungspolitische Defizite des GATT," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 6, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tuedps:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/104962/1/tdb006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, 1988. "Strengthening GATT Procedures for Settling Trade Disputes," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 55-90, March.
    2. Ruggie, John Gerard, 1982. "International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 379-415, April.
    3. Lipson, Charles, 1982. "The transformation of trade: the sources and effects of regime change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 417-455, April.
    4. Langhammer, Rolf J., 1987. "Die Sonderbehandlung der Entwicklungsländer im GATT: Eine Nutzen- und Kostenbilanz," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1982, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Strange, Susan, 1985. "Protectionism and World Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 233-259, April.
    6. Frieder Roessler & Antoine‐Augustin Cournot, 1985. "The Scope, Limits and Function of the GATT Legal System," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), pages 287-298, September.
    7. Martin Wolf, 1986. "Fiddling While the GATT Burnsa," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, March.
    8. J. Michael Finger, 1986. "Ideas Count, Words Inform," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: R. H. Snape (ed.), Issues in World Trade Policy, chapter 13, pages 257-280, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Senti Richard, 1987. "Die wirtschaftliche Relevanz des GATT," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 36(1), pages 193-206, September.
    10. Flassbeck, Heiner, 1985. "Freihandel, Gatt und das internationale Währungssystem," Beiträge zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen;Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg, Germany, edition 1, number urn:isbn:9783163449596, December.
    11. Gary P. Sampson & Richard H. Snape, 1985. "Identifying the Issues in Trade in Services," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 171-182, June.
    12. David Greenaway, 1987. "Intra‐Industry Trade, Intra‐Firm Trade and European Integration: Evidence, Gains and Policy Aspects," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 153-172, December.
    13. Per Magnus Wijkman, 1986. "Informal Systemic Change in the GATT," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 37-50, March.
    14. Finalyzson, Jock A. & Zacher, Mark W., 1981. "The GATT and the regulation of trade barrier: regime dynamics and functions," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 561-602, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanberg, Viktor, 1990. "A Constitutional Political Economy Perspective on International Trade," 1990: The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade Meeting, December 1990, San Diego, CA 50875, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    2. Molsberger, Josef, 1995. "Die Zukunft des GATT," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 52, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernard Hoekman & Douglas Nelson, 2020. "Rethinking international subsidy rules," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3104-3132, December.
    2. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
    3. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2010. "Services Trade and Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 642-692, September.
    4. Vigvári, Gábor, 2022. "Transzformáció és a populizmus a visegrádi országokban [Transformation and populism in the V4 countries]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 339-366.
    5. Cohen, Joseph N., 2008. "Managing the Faustian bargain: monetary autonomy in the pursuit of development in Eastern Europe and Latin America," MPRA Paper 22435, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. repec:dgr:rugsom:00c21 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Álvaro Santos, 2023. "International Investment Law in the Shadow of Populism: Between Redomestication and Liberalism Re‐Embedded," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 203-213.
    8. Kono Daniel Y., 2011. "Insuring Free Trade: Unemployment Insurance and Trade Policy," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, October.
    9. Adelle BLACKETT & Colleen SHEPPARD, 2003. "Collective bargaining and equality: Making connections," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 142(4), pages 419-457, December.
    10. Liesbet Hooghe & Tobias Lenz & Gary Marks, 2019. "Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 731-743, December.
    11. Lucretia Mariana Constantinescu & Maria Cristina Stefan, 2016. "Post - Crisis Resilience and Trends in the International Service Exchanges by Romania," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 146-155.
    12. Robert E. Baldwin & J. David Richardson, 1987. "Recent U.S. Trade Policy and Its Global Implications," NBER Chapters, in: Trade and Structural Change in Pacific Asia, pages 121-156, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. repec:wip:wpaper:3 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Milsom, Luke & Pažitka, Vladimír & Roland, Isabelle & Wójcik, Dariusz, 2023. "The gravity of syndication ties in international equity underwriting," Bank of England working papers 1021, Bank of England.
    15. Amy A. Quark & Rachel Lienesch, 2017. "Scientific boundary work and food regime transitions: the double movement and the science of food safety regulation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 645-661, September.
    16. Joseph Francois & Miriam Manchin & Patrick Tomberger, 2015. "Services Linkages and the Value Added Content of Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1631-1649, November.
    17. Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "How Does Democratic Accountability Shape International Cooperation?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 28-55, February.
    18. Andreas Bergh & Anders Kärnä, 2021. "Globalization and populism in Europe," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 51-70, October.
    19. Antoni Estevadeordal & Alan M. Taylor, 2013. "Is the Washington Consensus Dead? Growth, Openness, and the Great Liberalization, 1970s–2000s," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(5), pages 1669-1690, December.
    20. Loewen, Howard, 2006. "Towards a Dynamic Model of the Interplay Between International Institutions," GIGA Working Papers 17, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    21. Federico Podestà, 2016. "Do Big Governments Promote Trade Liberalization? A Long-Term Analysis of 18 OECD Countries, 1975-2000," FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers 2016-02, Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (IRVAPP), Bruno Kessler Foundation.
    22. Weinberg, Joe, 2018. "Where’s the Pork?: The Political Economy of the US Farm Bill," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273867, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tuedps:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wftuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.