IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tuedps/56.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Welthandelsorganisation (WTO) und die geistigen Eigentumsrechte

Author

Listed:
  • Preuße, Heinz Gert

Abstract

In dieser Arbeit soll das TRIPS-Abkommen unter Berücksichtigung dieser innovationstheoretischen Überlegungen analysiert werden. Dazu soll das Problem zunächst aus der unterschiedlichen Sichtweise der Industrie- und Entwicklungsländer aufgezeigt werden. Danach wird kurz dargestellt, wie sich der Schutz des geistigen Eigentums im neuen TRIPS-Abkommen niedergeschlagen hat. Anschließend sollen einige potentielle Wirkungen veränderter Schutzrechte zur Sprache kommen.

Suggested Citation

  • Preuße, Heinz Gert, 1995. "Die Welthandelsorganisation (WTO) und die geistigen Eigentumsrechte," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 56, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tuedps:56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/104873/1/tdb056.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Easterlin, 1992. "Analysis," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 51-53, July.
    2. Gerhard Fisch & Bernhard Speyer, 1995. "TRIPs as an adjustment mechanism in North-South trade," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 30(2), pages 65-69, March.
    3. Balassa, Bela, 1979. "The Changing Pattern of Comparative Advantage in Manufactured Goods," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 61(2), pages 259-266, May.
    4. Siebert, Horst, 1991. "A Schumpeterian model of growth in the world economy: some notes on a new paradigm in international economics," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1498, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Keith E. Maskus, 1990. "Normative Concerns in the International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights," NBER Chapters, in: New Issues in the Uruguay Round, pages 387-409, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. John Beath, 1990. "Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights and the Uruguay Round," NBER Chapters, in: New Issues in the Uruguay Round, pages 411-426, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Guerrieri, Paolo & Milana, Carlo, 1995. "Changes and Trends in the World Trade in High-Technology Products," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(1), pages 225-242, February.
    8. Robert P. Benko, 1988. "Intellectual Property Rights and the Uruguay Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 217-232, June.
    9. John Beath, 1990. "Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights and the Uruguay Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 411-426, September.
    10. John Mutti, 1993. "Intellectual Property Protection in the United States under Section 337," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 339-357, May.
    11. Arvind Subramanian, 1990. "TRIPs and the Paradigm of the GATT: a Tropical, Temperate View," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 509-522, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Mutti, 1993. "Intellectual Property Protection in the United States under Section 337," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 339-357, May.
    2. Lionel Fontagné & Jean-Louis Guérin, 1997. "Innovation, imitation et rattrapage en présence de rigidités sur le marché du travail," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 48(5), pages 1265-1290.
    3. Dezhong Duan & Qifan Xia, 2022. "From the United States to China? A trade perspective to reveal the structure and dynamics of global electronic‐telecommunications," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 823-847, June.
    4. F. Gerard Adams & Byron Gangnes & Yochanan Shachmurove, 2006. "Why is China so Competitive? Measuring and Explaining China's Competitiveness," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 95-122, February.
    5. Martinez, Richard J. & Norman, Patricia M., 2004. "Whither reputation? The effects of different stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 25-32.
    6. Peter Van Wijck & Ben Van Velthoven, 2000. "An Economic Analysis of the American and the Continental Rule for Allocating Legal Costs," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 115-125, March.
    7. M. Prasanna Mohan Raj & Satam Roy, 2015. "Impact of Brand Image on Consumer Decision-making: A Study on High-technology Products," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(3), pages 463-477, June.
    8. Arvind PANAGARIYA, 2000. "The Millennium Round And Developing Countries: Negotiating Strategies And Areas Of Benefits," G-24 Discussion Papers 1, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    9. Allan M. Feldman & Ram Singh, 2009. "Comparative Vigilance," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 134-161.
    10. Adrian Wood, 1991. "What Do Developing‐country Manufactured Exports Consist of?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 177-196, June.
    11. Schäfer, Andreas & Schneider, Maik T., 2015. "Endogenous Enforcement Of Intellectual Property, North–South Trade, And Growth," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 1074-1115, July.
    12. Sumner J. La Croix & Denise Eby Konan, 2002. "Intellectual Property Rights in China: The Changing Political Economy of Chinese–American Interests," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 759-788, June.
    13. Nisha Taneja & Saon Ray & Devyani Pande, 2016. "India –Pakistan Trade: Textiles and Clothing," Working Papers id:11056, eSocialSciences.
    14. Sabatini, Fabio, 2008. "Does Social Capital Mitigate Precariousness?," MPRA Paper 6639, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Bruno Deffains & Marie Obidzinski, 2009. "Real Options Theory for Law Makers," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 75(1), pages 93-117.
    16. Giovanni Immordino & Michele Polo, 2008. "Judicial Errors, Legal Standards and Innovative Activity," CSEF Working Papers 196, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy, revised 04 Jun 2010.
    17. McCalman, Phillip, 2001. "Reaping what you sow: an empirical analysis of international patent harmonization," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 161-186, October.
    18. Alemayehu Geda & Atnafu Meskel, 2008. "China and India's Growth Surge: Is it a curse or blessing for Africa? The Case of Manufactured Exports," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 20(2), pages 247-272.
    19. Harabi, Najib, 1994. "Technischer Fortschritt in der Schweiz: Empirische Ergebnisse aus industrieökonomischer Sicht [Technischer Fortschritt in der Schweiz:Empirische Ergebnisse aus industrieökonomischer Sicht]," MPRA Paper 6725, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Edward L. Glaeser & Andrei Shleifer, 2003. "The Rise of the Regulatory State," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 401-425, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tuedps:56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wftuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.