IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/smwarg/132.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Von der Währungs- zur Transferunion

Author

Listed:
  • König, Jörg

Abstract

Die Einheit Europas ist ohne jede Abstriche ein wertvolles und erstrebenswertes Ziel. Schließlich ist eine stabilitätsund wachstumsfördernde Gemeinschaft, die auf gleichen Werten und Prinzipien beruht, eine wichtige Voraussetzung für den Erfolg des Integrations- und Friedensprojekts Europäische Union. Mit Blick auf die Konstruktionsschwächen des gemeinsamen Währungsverbunds und den induzierten Fehlanreizen zweifelhafter Euro-"Rettungsaktionen" der vergangenen Jahre, ist die Erreichung dieses Ziels jedoch in weite Ferne gerückt. Insbesondere die nicht enden wollende Odyssee der Griechenland-"Rettung", deren Ausgang nach wie vor ungewiss ist, hat verdeutlicht, dass Solidarität in Europa keine Einbahnstraße sein darf. Zur kollektiven Solidarität gehören nicht nur einseitige Hilfen, sondern auch die Verpflichtung zu eigenverantwortlicher finanzieller Solidität und die Einhaltung gemeinsam getroffener Regeln. Beide Prinzipien wurden jedoch wiederholt und vorsätzlich verletzt. Fiskalische Defizitgrenzen wurden weit überschritten und Überschreitungen teilweise gekonnt verschleiert, Reformen wurden mehrfach nicht umgesetzt, "letzte und allerletzte Fristen" hat man bewusst verstreichen lassen. "Wenn es ernst wird, muss man lügen", hat der heutige EU-Kommissionspräsident Jean-Claude Juncker einmal behauptet. Wenn Verschleierungstaktiken nicht nur der griechischen Regierung, sondern auch der europäischen Gläubiger - beispielsweise in Bezug auf die Nicht-Beistandsklausel für Mitgliedstaaten und das EZB-Verbot der monetären Staatsfinanzierung - allerdings dazu führen, dass sich immer größere Teile der Bevölkerung entmündigt fühlen und in der Folge Links- und Rechtspopulisten europaweit großen Zulauf erhalten, gefährdet diese Politik das Integrations- und Friedensprojekt Europa mehr denn je. Daher müssen die Risiken der Euro-"Rettungspolitik" offengelegt und als Chance zur Neuordnung der Währungsunion begriffen werden. Zu den Risiken gehört, dass Kredithilfen an offenkundig insolvente und reformunwillige Staaten de facto finanzielle Transfers bedeuten. Die Euro-Staaten haften für Verbindlichkeiten eines anderen Mitgliedes und verstoßen somit gegen geltendes EU-Recht. Der Anreiz zu eigenverantwortlicher und solider Finanzpolitik wird erheblich reduziert, obwohl letzteres im Eigeninteresse der Staaten liegen sollte. [...]

Suggested Citation

  • König, Jörg, 2016. "Von der Währungs- zur Transferunion," Argumente zur Marktwirtschaft und Politik 132, Stiftung Marktwirtschaft / The Market Economy Foundation, Berlin.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:smwarg:132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/126131/1/845686542.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frankel, Jeffrey A & Rose, Andrew K, 1998. "The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(449), pages 1009-1025, July.
    2. Hans-Werner Sinn & Timo Wollmershäuser, 2011. "Target-Kredite, Leistungsbilanzsalden und Kapitalverkehr: Der Rettungsschirm der EZB," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(1), pages 01-29, June.
    3. Barry Eichengreen, 1992. "Is Europe an Optimum Currency Area?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Silvio Borner & Herbert Grubel (ed.), The European Community after 1992, chapter 8, pages 138-161, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Martin Feldstein, 1997. "The Political Economy of the European Economic and Monetary Union: Political Sources of an Economic Liability," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 23-42, Fall.
    5. von Hagen, Jurgen & Neumann, Manfred J M, 1994. "Real Exchange Rates within and between Currency Areas: How Far Away Is EMU?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 76(2), pages 236-244, May.
    6. Salvatore, Dominick, 1997. "The Common Unresolved Problem with the EMS and EMU," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 224-226, May.
    7. Hans-Werner Sinn, 2011. "Target-Salden, Außenhandel und Geldschöpfung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(09), pages 23-25, May.
    8. Hans-Werner Sinn, 2015. "Die griechische Tragödie," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 68, pages 03-33, May.
    9. Fuest, Clemens & Heinemann, Friedrich & Schröder, Christoph, 2014. "A viable insolvency procedure for sovereigns (VIPS) in the euro area," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-053, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. International Monetary Fund, 2014. "Jamaica: Sixth Review Under the Arrangement Under the Extended Fund Facility," IMF Staff Country Reports 2014/359, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Jörg König & Renate Ohr, 2013. "Different Efforts in European Economic Integration: Implications of the EU Index," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 1074-1090, November.
    12. Salomon Fiedler & Stefan Kooths, 2015. "Griechenland – zwischen Insolvenz und Schuldenerlass," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 95(9), pages 609-613, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Jonung & Eoin Drea, 2010. "It Can't Happen, It's a Bad Idea, It Won't Last: U.S. Economists on the EMU and the Euro, 1989–2002," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4–52, January.
    2. Ansgar Belke & Clemens Domnick & Daniel Gros, 2017. "Business Cycle Synchronization in the EMU: Core vs. Periphery," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 863-892, November.
    3. Devereux, Michael B, 2000. "A Simple Dynamic General Equilibrium Model Of The Tradeoff Between Fixed And Floating Exchange Rates," CEPR Discussion Papers 2403, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Alban Mathieu, 2021. "Frankel and Rose’s Introduction to the Endogeneity of Optimality: A Model Limited to the European Monetary Experience," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 299-314, July.
    5. Paolo Pasimeni, 2014. "An Optimum Currency Crisis," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 11(2), pages 173-204, December.
    6. Vera van Hüllen, 2013. "Political Legitimacy in a Non-optimal Currency Area," KFG Working Papers p0052, Free University Berlin.
    7. Sergey Drobyshevsky & Dmitri Polevoy, 2004. "Problems Associated with Creation of a Single Currency Zone in the CIS Countries," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 80P, pages 110-110.
    8. Hélène Erkel-Rousse, 1997. "Degré de flexibilité des marchés du travail, ajustement à des chocs asymétriques et union monétaire européenne," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 128(2), pages 79-100.
    9. Casimir Dadak, 2011. "Political Economy of the Euro Area Crisis," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 58(5), pages 593-604, December.
    10. Handler, Heinz, 2013. "The eurozone: piecemeal approach to an optimum currency area," MPRA Paper 67183, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Michael B. Devereux, 2000. "A Simple Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis of the Trade-off Between Fixed and Floating Exchange Rates," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1544, Econometric Society.
    12. Leon, Costas, 2006. "The European and the Greek Business Cycles: Are they synchronized?," MPRA Paper 1312, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Domenico Giannone & Michele Lenza & Lucrezia Reichlin, 2010. "Business Cycles in the Euro Area," NBER Chapters, in: Europe and the Euro, pages 141-167, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Pinchuk Anastasiya K., 2013. "Theory of Optimal Currency Zones: from Classics until Today," Business Inform, RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE), Kharkiv National University of Economics, issue 12, pages 81-87.
    15. Shin, Kwanho & Wang, Yunjong, 2004. "Trade integration and business cycle co-movements: the case of Korea with other Asian countries," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 213-230, April.
    16. Woosik Moon & Yeongseop Rhee, 2012. "Asian Monetary Integration," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14191.
    17. Gabriel, Ricardo Duque & Pessoa, Ana Sofia, 2024. "Adopting the euro: A synthetic control approach," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Ignacy Święcicki & Jan J. Michałek, 2014. "Sources of difficulties in coordination of monetary and fiscal policies in the European Economic and Monetary Union," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 39.
    19. Linda Glawe & Helmut Wagner, 2021. "Divergence Tendencies in the European Integration Process: A Danger for the Sustainability of the E(M)U?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Fujiki, Hiroshi & Otani, Akira, 2002. "Do Currency Regimes Matter in the 21st Century? An Overview," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 20(S1), pages 47-79, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:smwarg:132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stmwide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.