IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/rpaebs/42022.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sustainability of pharmaceutical expenditures in the German social health care system

Author

Listed:
  • Hammerschmidt, Thomas

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical expenditure grow strongly in most health care systems. Especially high prices of new drugs are perceived to be driver of growth which might threaten the sustainability of financing drugs. Objective: The study aims to analyse a) whether German health policies can achieve sustainable growth of pharmaceutical expenditure, and b) which therapeutic groups fasten and slow pharmaceutical growth based on price and/or volume effects. Methods: Annual growth rates of pharmaceutical expenditure in the German social health insurance (SHI) between 2006 and 2018 are compared with indicators reflecting the ability to pay. Annual growth rate in therapeutic subgroups are analysed with respects to volume and price developments. Results: Without policies to control pharmaceutical spending, annual growth rates are significantly higher than the growths of indicators of ability to pay. After accounting for the savings from health policy measures, net pharmaceutical expenditure does not grow significantly faster than ability to pay. Policies mainly targeting generic drugs achieve threefold savings compared with policies targeting at patent-protected drugs, although the latter account for more than halve of the expenditure. A limited number of therapeutic subgroups with new drugs grow significantly faster than average expenditure, but this growths is counterbalanced by subgroups which in the end of their innovation cycle and a huge proportion of generic drugs. Conclusion: The growths of net drug expenditure in the German SHI does not threaten the sustainability of financing health expenditure based on comprehensive policy measures and innovation cycle effects. Generics do contribute savings to a larger extent.

Suggested Citation

  • Hammerschmidt, Thomas, 2022. "Sustainability of pharmaceutical expenditures in the German social health care system," Rosenheim Papers in Applied Economics and Business Sciences 4/2022, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:rpaebs:42022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/266206/1/rosenheim-paper-4-2022.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annalisa Belloni & David Morgan & Valérie Paris, 2016. "Pharmaceutical Expenditure And Policies: Past Trends And Future Challenges," OECD Health Working Papers 87, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wettstein, Dominik J. & Boes, Stefan, 2022. "How value-based policy interventions influence price negotiations for new medicines: An experimental approach and initial evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 112-121.
    2. Aaltonen, Katri & Vaalavuo, Maria, 2024. "Financial burden of medicines in five Northern European countries: A decommodification perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    3. Simon Pol & Paula Rojas Garcia & Fernando Antoñanzas Villar & Maarten J. Postma & Antoinette D. I. Asselt, 2021. "Health-Economic Analyses of Diagnostics: Guidance on Design and Reporting," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(12), pages 1355-1363, December.
    4. Bence Kovács & Miklós Darida & Judit Simon, 2021. "Drugs Becoming Generics—The Impact of Genericization on the Market Performance of Antihypertensive Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Barrenho, Eliana & Halmai, Réka & Miraldo, Marisa & Tzintzun, Iván & Raïs Ali, Setti & Toulemon, Léa & Dupont, Jean-Claude K. & Rochaix, Lise, 2022. "Inequities in cancer drug development in terms of unmet medical need," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    6. Serra-Sastre, Victoria & Bianchi, Simona & Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge & O’Neill, Phill, 2021. "Does NICE influence the adoption and uptake of generics in the UK?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113639, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Christensen, Elisabeth & Hirsch, Niels Christian & Andersen, Jonas Valbjørn & Ehlers, Lars Holger, 2022. "The analogue substitution model: Introducing competition in the absence of generic substitution in Danish hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 844-852.
    8. Hye-Jae Lee & Euna Han & Hyero Kim, 2020. "Comparison of Utilization Trends between Biosimilars and Generics: Lessons from the Nationwide Claims Data in South Korea," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 557-566, August.
    9. Vogler, Sabine & Zimmermann, Nina & de Joncheere, Kees, 2016. "Policy interventions related to medicines: Survey of measures taken in European countries during 2010–2015," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(12), pages 1363-1377.
    10. Yael Rachamin & Christoph Jakob Ackermann & Oliver Senn & Thomas Grischott, 2021. "Price trends of reimbursed oncological drugs in Switzerland in 2005–2019: A descriptive analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Nazila Yousefi & Mahyar Polroudi Moghaddam & Gita Afsharmanesh & Farzad Peiravian, 2020. "Evaluation of efficiency enhancement in Iran Health Insurance Organization: a policy brief for pharmaceutical cost containment," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 1503-1511, November.
    12. Russo, Pierluigi & Carletto, Angelica & Németh, Gergely & Habl, Claudia, 2021. "Medicine price transparency and confidential managed-entry agreements in Europe: findings from the EURIPID survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(9), pages 1140-1145.
    13. Kyung-Bok Son, 2020. "Is greater generic competition also linked to lower drug prices in South Korea?," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Meina Hua & Huajun Tang & Ivan Ka Wai Lai, 2017. "Game Theoretic Analysis of Pricing and Cooperative Advertising in a Reverse Supply Chain for Unwanted Medications in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-31, October.
    15. Dominik J. Wettstein & Stefan Boes, 2020. "The impact of reimbursement negotiations on cost and availability of new pharmaceuticals: evidence from an online experiment," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Pessino, Carola & Izquierdo, Alejandro & Vuletin, Guillermo, 2018. "Better Spending for Better Lives: How Latin America and the Caribbean Can Do More with Less," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 9152, November.
    17. Victoria Serra-Sastre & Simona Bianchi & Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Phill O’Neill, 2021. "Does NICE influence the adoption and uptake of generics in the UK?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(2), pages 229-242, March.
    18. Dominik J. Wettstein & Stefan Boes, 2019. "Effectiveness of National Pricing Policies for Patent-Protected Pharmaceuticals in the OECD: A Systematic Literature Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 143-162, April.
    19. Berger, Michael & Pock, Markus & Reiss, Miriam & Röhrling, Gerald & Czypionka, Thomas, 2023. "Exploring the effectiveness of demand-side retail pharmaceutical expenditure reforms: cross-country evidence from weighted-average least squares estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116928, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Michael Berger & Markus Pock & Miriam Reiss & Gerald Röhrling & Thomas Czypionka, 2023. "Exploring the effectiveness of demand-side retail pharmaceutical expenditure reforms," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 149-172, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:rpaebs:42022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.th-rosenheim.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.