IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/pfobei/103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stoffstromnetze und ihre Nutzung für mehr Kostentransparenz sowie die Analyse der Umweltwirkung betrieblicher Stoffströme

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Mario
  • Keil, René

Abstract

Die Modellierung und Analyse von betrieblichen Stoffstromsystemen gewinnt in der Praxis zunehmend an Bedeutung. Die Methode der Stoffstromnetze erweisen sich hierbei als mächtiges Instrumentarium für die Durchführung verschiedenster Analysen. Durch die saubere methodische Trennung von Mengen- und Wertebene erschließt sich dem Anwender ein ungewöhnlich großes Anwendungsspektrum. Der Beitrag führt in die methodischen Hintergründe der Stoffstromnetze ein und erläutert die Umsetzung in der Software Umberto®. Wesentliche Punkte sind die Leistungsverrechnung und die monetären Bewertungs- und Analysemöglichkeiten von Stoffstromnetzen.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Mario & Keil, René, 2002. "Stoffstromnetze und ihre Nutzung für mehr Kostentransparenz sowie die Analyse der Umweltwirkung betrieblicher Stoffströme," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 103, Pforzheim University.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:pfobei:103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/97586/1/786466316.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heijungs, Reinout, 1994. "A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 69-81, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gildeggen, Rainer & Willburger, Andreas, 2016. "What constitutes a compensation free regulation of foreign-owned property in international law? Some thoughts on the protection of foreign investment against expropriations, the states' right to regul," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 160, Pforzheim University.
    2. van der Burg, Tsjalle, 2022. "Competitive balance and demand for football: A review of the literature," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 179, Pforzheim University.
    3. Möller, Klaus & Gairing, Fritz & Mezger, Daniel & Jehnichen, Thomas, 2020. "Design of training processes in manual order picking," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 175, Pforzheim University.
    4. Leroch, Martin Alois, 2022. "Moral institutions and evolution: In search of equilibria," Beiträge der Hochschule Pforzheim 176, Pforzheim University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    2. Suh, Sangwon, 2004. "Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 451-467, April.
    3. Gemechu, E.D. & Butnar, I. & Llop, M. & Castells, F., 2012. "Environmental tax on products and services based on their carbon footprint: A case study of the pulp and paper sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 336-344.
    4. Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus & Siu, Yim Ling & Li, Xin, 2014. "The energy and water nexus in Chinese electricity production: A hybrid life cycle analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 342-355.
    5. Mathieu Saurat & Michael Ritthoff, 2013. "Calculating MIPS 2.0," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Samuele Lo Piano & Lorenzo Benini, 2022. "A critical perspective on uncertainty appraisal and sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 763-781, June.
    7. Chen, C. & Habert, G. & Bouzidi, Y. & Jullien, A. & Ventura, A., 2010. "LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1231-1240.
    8. Frans Berkhout, 1996. "Life Cycle Assessment And Innovation In Large Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 145-155, September.
    9. Alexis Laurent & Bo P. Weidema & Jane Bare & Xun Liao & Danielle Maia de Souza & Massimo Pizzol & Serenella Sala & Hanna Schreiber & Nils Thonemann & Francesca Verones, 2020. "Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 986-1003, October.
    10. Reinout Heijungs & Yi Yang & Hung‐Suck Park, 2022. "A or I‐A? Unifying the computational structures of process‐ and IO‐based LCA for clarity and consistency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1824-1836, October.
    11. Shunsuke Okamoto, 2015. "Analyzing instability of industrial clustering techniques," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 17(3), pages 389-406, July.
    12. Stefano Cucurachi & Carlos Felipe Blanco & Bernhard Steubing & Reinout Heijungs, 2022. "Implementation of uncertainty analysis and moment‐independent global sensitivity analysis for full‐scale life cycle assessment models," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 374-391, April.
    13. Kandelaars, Patricia P. A. A. H. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M., 1997. "Dynamic analysis of materials-product chains: An application to window frames," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 41-61, July.
    14. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Park, Young-Kwon & Fallahi, Alireza & Sulaiman, Alawi & Ranjbari, Meisam & Rahnama, Hassan & Aghbashl, 2022. "Environmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Dodbiba, Gjergj & Nukaya, Teiji & Kamioka, Yousuke & Tanimura, Yuji & Fujita, Toyohisa, 2009. "Removal of arsenic from wastewater using iron compound: Comparing two different types of adsorbents in the context of LCA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 688-697.
    16. Awais Mahmood & Viganda Varabuntoonvit & Jitti Mungkalasiri & Thapat Silalertruksa & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2022. "A Tier-Wise Method for Evaluating Uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Heidi Hottenroth & Hendrik Lambrecht & Nadine Rötzer & Tobias Viere, 2016. "Ökobilanzielle Elemente in integrierten Ressourceneffizienzanalysen der chemischen Industrie," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 15-23, June.
    18. Xueting Zhao, 2015. "LCA Methodologies an Annotated Bibliography," Working Papers Resource Document 2015-03, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:pfobei:103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwpfode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.