IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/p0044.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The institutional problem-solving capacities of the council: The committee of permanent representatives and the methods of community

Author

Listed:
  • Lewis, Jeffrey

Abstract

The quiet evolution of the Committee of Permanent Representatives (Coreper) into a de facto decision-making body has received surprisingly little attention by integration researchers. Even less attention has been paid to the novel institutional form and underlying rationality of this forum at the interface between the national and Community levels. Based on extensive semi-structured interviews with members of the Brussels' permanent representations, this essay examines how Coreper maintains the performance and output of the Council through the production of a distinct culture of compromise and community-method. The result, empirically demonstrated in case studies of the 1994 local elections directive and of the 1996 Helms-Burton countermeasures, is a shared commitment to finding solutions, where membership in the collective decision-making process has become part of the rational calculus of defining and defending self-interests. These findings suggest the need to modify the instrumentalist, 'hard bargaining' image of EU decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Lewis, Jeffrey, 1998. "The institutional problem-solving capacities of the council: The committee of permanent representatives and the methods of community," MPIfG Discussion Paper 98/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:p0044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43286/1/640600913.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiona Hayes‐Renshaw & Christian Lequesne & Pedro Mayor Lopez, 1989. "The Permanent Representations of the Member States to the European Communities," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 119-137, December.
    2. Thomas Risse‐kappen, 1996. "Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 53-80, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schunz, Simon, 2012. "Explaining the evolution of European Union foreign climate policy: A case of bounded adaptiveness," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 16, February.
    2. Harriet Bulkeley & Andy Jordan, 2012. "Guest Editorial," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(4), pages 556-570, August.
    3. Beyers, Jan, 1998. "Where does supranationalism come from? Ideas floating through the working groups of the Council of the European Union," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 2, November.
    4. Hooghe, Liesbet, 1997. "Serving 'Europe' Political Orientations of Senior Commission Officials," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 1, April.
    5. Vanhoonacker, Sophie and Christine Neuhold, 2015. "Dynamics of institutional cooperation in the European Union: Dimensions and effects. An Introduction," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 19, January.
    6. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m1ga289 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Oto Potluka & Joyce Liddle, 2014. "Managing European Union Structural Funds: Using a Multilevel Governance Framework to Examine the Application of the Partnership Principle at the Project Level," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(8), pages 1434-1447, August.
    8. Tanja A. Boerzel & Madeleine O. Hosli, 2002. "Comparative Federalism meets the European Union," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0007, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    9. Tanja E. Aalberts, 2005. "Sovereignty Reloaded? A Constructivist Perspective on European Research," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0010, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    10. Laffan, Brigid, 1997. "The European Union: A Distinctive Model of Internationalisation?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 1, October.
    11. Sarker, Pradip Kumar & Rahman, Md Saifur & Giessen, Lukas, 2018. "Regional governance by the South Asia Cooperative Environment Program (SACEP)? Institutional design and customizable regime policy offering flexible political options," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 454-470.
    12. Assem Dandashly, 2012. "The Holy Trinity of Democracy, Economic Development, and Security. EU Democratization Efforts Beyond its Borders - The Case of Tunisia," KFG Working Papers p0042, Free University Berlin.
    13. Pradip Kumar Sarker & Md Saifur Rahman & Lukas Giessen, 2019. "Regional economic regimes and the environment: stronger institutional design is weakening environmental policy capacity of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 19-52, February.
    14. Alasdair R. Young, 2001. "Extending European Cooperation: The European Union and the 'New' International Trade Agenda," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 12, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    15. Cornelia Woll & Sophie Jacquot, 2010. "Using Europe: Strategic Action in Multi-Level Politics," Post-Print hal-01023857, HAL.
    16. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:1-19 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m1ga289 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. A Jones & J R A Clark, 1999. "The European Parliament: Agenda Territories and Agri-Environment Policymaking," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(2), pages 127-144, April.
    19. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m1ga289 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Cornelia Woll & Sophie Jacquot, 2010. "Using Europe: Strategic Action in Multi-Level Politics," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01023857, HAL.
    21. Jakob Lempp, 2007. "ÒCoreper EnlargedÓ: how Enlargement Affected the Functioning of the Committee of Permanent Representatives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 6(March), pages 31-52.
    22. Hijdra, Arjan & Woltjer, Johan & Arts, Jos, 2015. "Troubled waters: An institutional analysis of ageing Dutch and American waterway infrastructure," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 64-74.
    23. Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary, 1997. "The Making of a Polity: The Struggle Over European Integration," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 1, April.
    24. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:191-219 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m1ga289 is not listed on IDEAS
    26. Schmidt, Susanne K., 1996. "Sterile debates and dubious generalisations: An empirical critique of European integration theory based on the integration processes in telecommunications and electricity," MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:p0044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.