IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/926.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing National Patterns of Medical Specialization: A Contribution to the Theory of Professions

Author

Listed:
  • Döhler, Marian

Abstract

Policy-making is often characterized by connected processes of conflict management in organizationally separated, but functionally linked arenas. Such multi-level structures are prone to blockades of decision-making, because boundaries between arenas can reinforce conflicts and rules of interaction can reduce the range of alternative decisions. These problems are structureinduced, their solution requires changes in the organizational framework. Linked arenas are - as a rule - merely loosely-coupled. This is why the fabric of multi-level policy processes can be structured by strategic manipulation. Three strategies of interorganizational management via structural adaptation are discussed. All of them revise conditions of conflict generation and conflict solving and reduce the likelihood of blockades. However, the consequences are ambivalent. As the strategies change power relations in the policy field, they provoke reactions of negatively affected actors, who try to regain influence by establishing secondary informal linkages. As a result, multi-level structures develop multiple connections and network-like relations which interact in a dynamic process of permanent adaptation.

Suggested Citation

  • Döhler, Marian, 1992. "Comparing National Patterns of Medical Specialization: A Contribution to the Theory of Professions," MPIfG Discussion Paper 92/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/125913/1/mpifg-dp92-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.