IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/202310.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

"Value added" für Theorie und Praxis: Anregungen zur Wirtschaftsphilosophie

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Hübscher, Marc C.

Abstract

Forschungsgegenstand der Wirtschaftsphilosophie sind die Praxen der Wirtschaft und die Theorien, die sich mit Wirtschaft beschäftigen. Wir haben dieses Forschungsfeld mit verschiedenen Varianten einer Vier-Felder-Matrix aufgefächert, um deutlich zu machen, dass sowohl die Theoretische Philosophie als auch die Praktische Philosophie sich auf eine interessante und sogar gesellschaftlich relevante Weise mit der Wirtschaft und den 'Wirtschafts-Wissenschaften' zu beschäftigen vermögen. Wirtschaftsphilosophie, wie wir sie verstehen, dient der reflektierten Relationierung von Theorie und Praxis. Sie kann wertvolle - buchstäblich: wertschöpfende - Anregungen geben, festgefahrene Routinen zu hinterfragen, etwaige Fehlentwicklungen zu entdecken und - dies vor allem! - neue Möglichkeitenräume zu erschließen. Wir verstehen Wirtschaftsphilosophie als denkerische (Selbst-)Aufmunterung zur wirtschaft(swissenschaft)lichen (Selbst-)Aufklärung.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo & Hübscher, Marc C., 2023. ""Value added" für Theorie und Praxis: Anregungen zur Wirtschaftsphilosophie," Discussion Papers 2023-10, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:202310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/278720/1/1860406637.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon, Scott, 1978. "Should Economists Pay Attention to Philosophers? [Review Article]," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(4), pages 717-728, August.
    2. Boatright, John R., 1999. "Does Business Ethics Rest on a Mistake?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 583-591, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaret Oppenheimer & Helen LaVan & William Martin, 2015. "A Framework for Understanding Ethical and Efficiency Issues in Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property Litigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 505-524, December.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2008. "Corporate citizenship as stakeholder management: An ordonomic approach to business ethics," Discussion Papers 2008-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Roland Bardy & Stephen Drew & Tumenta Kennedy, 2012. "Foreign Investment and Ethics: How to Contribute to Social Responsibility by Doing Business in Less-Developed Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 267-282, March.
    4. John Hendry, 2001. "After Durkheim: An Agenda for the Sociology of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 209-218, December.
    5. Michael Schwartz & Heath Spong, 2009. "Subjectivist Economics and Ethical Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 123-136, November.
    6. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristoleian idea of individual citizenship," Discussion Papers 2012-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Ingo Pies & Philipp Schreck & Karl Homann, 2021. "Single-objective versus multi-objective theories of the firm: using a constitutional perspective to resolve an old debate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 779-811, April.
    8. Katinka Cranenburgh & Daniel Arenas, 2014. "Strategic and Moral Dilemmas of Corporate Philanthropy in Developing Countries: Heineken in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 523-536, July.
    9. Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2014. "Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade‐Offs Into Win–Win Outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 18-37, January.
    10. Wim Dubbink & Luc Liedekerke, 2014. "Grounding Positive Duties in Commercial Life," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 527-539, April.
    11. Pies, Ingo, 2023. "Folk economics and folk ethics as problems of moral reasoning: Ordonomic inspirations for business ethics," Discussion Papers 2023-13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    12. Pies, Ingo, 2023. "Folk Economics und Folk Ethics als moralisches Problem: Ordonomische Anregungen zur Business Ethics," Discussion Papers 2023-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    13. Marc Cohen, 2010. "The Narrow Application of Rawls in Business Ethics: A Political Conception of Both Stakeholder Theory and the Morality of Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(4), pages 563-579, December.
    14. Nass Elmar, 2018. "Why the Microlevel Determines the Future of the Social Market Economy?," Journal for Markets and Ethics, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 107-119, June.
    15. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2009. "Competitive markets, corporate firms, and new governance - An ordonomic conceptualization," Discussion Papers 2009-13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    16. Dongyong Zhang & Stephen Morse & Uma Kambhamptati & Bingjun Li, 2014. "Evolving Corporate Social Responsibility in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Pies, Ingo, 2022. "30 Jahre Unternehmensethik: Ein ordonomischer Rückblick, Überblick und Ausblick," Discussion Papers 2022-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    18. Chinmay Pattnaik & Qiang Lu & Ajai S. Gaur, 2018. "Group Affiliation and Entry Barriers: The Dark Side Of Business Groups In Emerging Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1051-1066, December.
    19. Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus, 2007. "Wie können Corporate Citizens voneinander lernen? Anregungen für den Global Compact der Vereinten Nationen," Discussion Papers 2007-13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    20. Pies, Ingo, 2022. "Management-Kompetenzen für nachhaltige Wertschöpfung: Anregungen aus ordonomischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 2022-06, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:202310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.