IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/200713.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wie können Corporate Citizens voneinander lernen? Anregungen für den Global Compact der Vereinten Nationen

Author

Listed:
  • Hielscher, Stefan
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Beckmann, Markus

Abstract

Der Global Compact der Vereinten Nationen versteht sich nicht als Regulierungsinitiative, sondern als freiwilliges Lern- und Dialogforum für Corporate Citizenship. Dieser Beitrag entwickelt Vorschläge, wie der Global Compact diesem Anspruch (noch besser) gerecht werden kann. Hier geht es um Strukturen in zweifacher Hinsicht: (a) Zum einen können Corporate Citizens besonders gut dann voneinander lernen, wenn sie sich über die strukturellen Bedingungen erfolgreicher – und auch fehlgeschlagener – Projekte offen austauschen können. (b) Hierfür sollte der Global Compact als Plattform die organisatorischen Strukturen bereitstellen, die ein solches strukturelles Lernen fördern. Vor diesem Hintergrund formuliert der Beitrag Anregungen sowohl auf der Ebene der Generierung erfolgreicher Global-Compact-Projekte als auch auf der Ebene der Organisation des Lernens auf den Arbeitstreffen des deutschen Global-Compact- Netzwerks. Er versteht sich als Lernbeitrag für besseres Lernen.

Suggested Citation

  • Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus, 2007. "Wie können Corporate Citizens voneinander lernen? Anregungen für den Global Compact der Vereinten Nationen," Discussion Papers 2007-13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:200713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170288/1/dp2007-13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boatright, John R., 1999. "Does Business Ethics Rest on a Mistake?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 583-591, October.
    2. Heath, Joseph, 2006. "Business Ethics without Stakeholders," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 533-557, October.
    3. John R. Boatright, 2006. "What's Wrong—and What's Right— with Stakeholder Management," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 22(Spring 20), pages 106-130.
    4. Buttkereit, Sören & Pies, Ingo, 2006. "The economic ethics of social dilemmas," Discussion Papers 2006-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2008. "Corporate citizenship as stakeholder management: An ordonomic approach to business ethics," Discussion Papers 2008-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2007. "Theorie für die Praxis - Zehn Thesen zur wirtschafts- und unternehmensethischen Ausbildung von Führungskräften," Discussion Papers 2007-15, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Margaret Oppenheimer & Helen LaVan & William Martin, 2015. "A Framework for Understanding Ethical and Efficiency Issues in Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property Litigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 505-524, December.
    4. Roland Bardy & Stephen Drew & Tumenta Kennedy, 2012. "Foreign Investment and Ethics: How to Contribute to Social Responsibility by Doing Business in Less-Developed Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 267-282, March.
    5. Jeffery Smith, 2018. "Efficiency and Ethically Responsible Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 603-618, July.
    6. John Hendry, 2001. "After Durkheim: An Agenda for the Sociology of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 209-218, December.
    7. Etye Steinberg, 2022. "Run for Your Life: The Ethics of Behavioral Tracking in Insurance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 665-682, September.
    8. Francis Weyzig, 2009. "Political and Economic Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis and a Proposition Regarding the CSR Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 417-428, June.
    9. Lisa Herzog, 2017. "No Company is an Island. Sector-Related Responsibilities as Elements of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 135-148, November.
    10. Abraham Singer, 2018. "Justice Failure: Efficiency and Equality in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 97-115, April.
    11. Michael Schwartz & Heath Spong, 2009. "Subjectivist Economics and Ethical Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 123-136, November.
    12. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristoleian idea of individual citizenship," Discussion Papers 2012-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    13. Ingo Pies & Philipp Schreck & Karl Homann, 2021. "Single-objective versus multi-objective theories of the firm: using a constitutional perspective to resolve an old debate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 779-811, April.
    14. Mindaugas Laužikas & Mindaugas Laužikas & Aistė Miliūtė & Aistė Miliūtė, 2019. "Transformational Communication via Evolving Ethical and Moral Norms of Lithuanian Civil Service Organizations," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1750-1761, June.
    15. Frooman, Jeff, 2021. "Where MLM Intersects MFA: Morally Suspect Goods and the Grounds for Regulatory Action," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 138-161, January.
    16. Wayne Norman & Caroline Roux & Philippe Bélanger, 2009. "Recognizing Business Ethics: Practical and Ethical Challenges in Awarding Prizes for Good Corporate Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 257-271, May.
    17. David Rönnegard & N. Craig Smith, 2024. "A Rawlsian Rule for Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 295-308, March.
    18. Mohamed Laid Ouakouak & Noufou Ouedraogo, 2017. "Antecedents Of Employee Creativity And Organisational Innovation: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Katinka Cranenburgh & Daniel Arenas, 2014. "Strategic and Moral Dilemmas of Corporate Philanthropy in Developing Countries: Heineken in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 523-536, July.
    20. Dennis Schoeneborn & Fabian Homberg, 2018. "Goffman’s Return to Las Vegas: Studying Corruption as Social Interaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 37-54, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organisationales Lernen; Unternehmensethik; Wirtschaftsethik; Corporate Social Responsibility; Corporate Citizenship; soziale Dilemmata; gesellschaftliche Verantwortung; strategisches Management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:200713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.