IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/lmuwim/22006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Methodenspektrum der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Überblick und Portfoliobildung

Author

Listed:
  • Wilde, Thomas
  • Hess, Thomas

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilde, Thomas & Hess, Thomas, 2006. "Methodenspektrum der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Überblick und Portfoliobildung," Working Papers 2/2006, University of Munich, Munich School of Management, Institute for Information Systems and New Media.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:lmuwim:22006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/60077/1/71972564X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lange, Carola, 2006. "Entwicklung und Stand der Disziplinen Wirtschaftsinformatik und Information Systems. Interpretative Auswertung von Interviews: Teil III - Ergebnisse zur Wirtschaftsinformatik," ICB Research Reports 4, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    2. Becker, Jörg & Holten, Roland & Knackstedt, Ralf & Niehaves, Björn, 2003. "Forschungsmethodische Positionierung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Epistemologische, ontologische und linguistische Leitfragen," Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik 93, University of Münster, Department of Information Systems.
    3. Juhani Iivari & Rudy Hirschheim & Heinz K. Klein, 1998. "A Paradigmatic Analysis Contrasting Information Systems Development Approaches and Methodologies," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 164-193, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abeer Al-Khoury & Sahraa Anwer Hussein & Muthana Abdulwhab & Zainab M. Aljuboori & Hossam Haddad & Mostafa A. Ali & Ibtihal A. Abed & Hakeem Hammood Flayyih, 2022. "Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Kazem Haki & Michael Blaschke & Stephan Aier & Robert Winter, 2019. "A Value Co-creation Perspective on Information Systems Analysis and Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 487-502, August.
    3. Richard Vidgen & Xiaofeng Wang, 2009. "Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 355-376, September.
    4. Rita Di Mascio, 2016. "Firms’ adoption of self-service technology: how managerial beliefs shape co-production decisions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(1), pages 79-97, June.
    5. Goles, Tim & Hirschheim, Rudy, 2000. "The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead...long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 249-268, June.
    6. Dirk Basten & Linda Schneider & Oleg Pankratz, 2017. "Codification, Personalisation, or in Between? Exploring Knowledge Characteristics to Guide Knowledge Management System Design," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-46, December.
    7. J Mingers, 2003. "A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(6), pages 559-570, June.
    8. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    9. Anang Sujoko & Unti Ludigdo & Iqbal Muhammad, 2021. "Management Strategy of Actual Tabloid Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan In Digital Era," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 19(1), pages 235-251, May.
    10. Mostafa A. Ali & Nazimah Hussin & Hossam Haddad & Reem Al-Araj & Ibtihal A. Abed, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance: Systematic Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Jaana Porra & Mary Lacity & Michael S. Parks, 2020. "“Can Computer Based Human-Likeness Endanger Humanness?” – A Philosophical and Ethical Perspective on Digital Assistants Expressing Feelings They Can’t Have”," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 533-547, June.
    12. Philipp Offermann & Sören Blom & Olga Levina & Udo Bub, 2010. "Proposal for Components of Method Design Theories," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(5), pages 295-304, October.
    13. Schauer, Carola, 2007. "Relevance and success of IS teaching and research: An analysis of the "Relevance Debate"," ICB Research Reports 19, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    14. Mohan, Kunal & Ahlemann, Frederik, 2013. "Understanding acceptance of information system development and management methodologies by actual users: A review and assessment of existing literature," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 831-839.
    15. Yixin Qiu & Anandasivam Gopal & Il-Horn Hann, 2017. "Logic Pluralism in Mobile Platform Ecosystems: A Study of Indie App Developers on the iOS App Store," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 225-249, June.
    16. Natalia Levina, 2005. "Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 109-130, June.
    17. Katharina Steininger & René Riedl & Friedrich Roithmayr & Peter Mertens, 2009. "Fads and Trends in Business and Information Systems Engineering and Information Systems Research – A Comparative Literature Analysis," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(6), pages 411-428, December.
    18. Heinz K. Klein & Rudy Hirschheim, 2001. "Choosing Between Competing Design Ideals in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 75-90, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:lmuwim:22006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.en.wim.bwl.uni-muenchen.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.