IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iwkpps/12015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das Tarifeinheitsgesetz: Juristischer Balanceakt mit ökonomischer Wirkung

Author

Listed:
  • Lesch, Hagen
  • Hellmich, Paula

Abstract

Die Bundesregierung hat ein Gesetz vorgelegt, mit dem sie den Grundsatz der Tarifeinheit wiederherstellen will. Zentrales Element ist eine Mehrheitsregel. Bei kollidierenden Tarifverträgen setzt sich der Tarifvertrag der Mehrheitsgewerkschaft durch. Das ist die Gewerkschaft, die im Geltungsbereich die meisten Mitglieder organisiert. Mit dieser Regelung wagt die Bundesregierung einen juristischen Balanceakt mit großer ökonomischer Wirkung. Die Regelung vermeidet eine weitere Fragmentierung des deutschen Tarifsystems und erhöht den Anreiz für konkurrierende Gewerkschaften, miteinander zu kooperieren. Damit werden kumulierende Konfliktrisiken in Tarifverhandlungen künftig vermieden. Sie treten nur in Fällen tarifpluraler Strukturen auf, die von den Tarifparteien autonom vereinbart werden. Außerdem verhindert die Regelung, dass Organisationsstreitigkeiten zwischen Gewerkschaften, die besonders konfliktintensiv ablaufen können, sich auf Tarifverhandlungen auswirken können.

Suggested Citation

  • Lesch, Hagen & Hellmich, Paula, 2015. "Das Tarifeinheitsgesetz: Juristischer Balanceakt mit ökonomischer Wirkung," IW policy papers 1/2015, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iwkpps:12015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/106404/1/815361963.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hagen Lesch, 2013. "Tarifeinheit versus Tarifpluralität: Konfliktintensität von Verhandlungen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 93(11), pages 765-770, October.
    2. Zimmer, Reingard (ed.), 2011. "Tarifeinheit – Tarifpluralität in Europa: Tarifrechtliche Probleme im europäischen Vergleich," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 265, March.
    3. Oswald, Andrew J, 1979. "Wage Determination in an Economy with Many Trade Unions," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 369-385, November.
    4. Haucap, Justus, 2012. "Tarifeinheit nicht durch Gesetz verankern," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 25, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    5. Andreas Harasser & Beatrice Pagel, 2010. "Nach dem Erfurter Urteil: Zersplitterung der Tariflandschaft nicht zu befürchten," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(30), pages 6-11.
    6. Goecke, Henry & Pimpertz, Jochen & Holger Schäfer & Schröder, Christoph, 2013. "Zehn Jahre Agenda 2010: Eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme ihrer Wirkungen," IW policy papers 7/2013, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    7. Lesch, Hagen, 2006. "Ökonomik des Tarifrechts," IW-Analysen, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, volume 19, number 19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norbert Berthold & Claus Schnabel & Hagen Lesch & Michael Fuchs & Klaus Dauderstädt, 2014. "Die Macht kleiner Gewerkschaften: Sollte der Einfluss der Spartengewerkschaften eingedämmt werden?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(24), pages 03-19, December.
    2. Ana Paula Martins, 2009. "Union duopoly with heterogeneous labor: the effect of minimum wage regulation," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(5), pages 580-607, April.
    3. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2008. "The Concept Of Comparison Income: An Historical Perspective," MPRA Paper 8713, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Gaetano D’Adamo, 2014. "Wage spillovers across sectors in Eastern Europe," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 523-552, September.
    5. Pankaj C. Patel & Cornelius A. Rietveld, 2023. "Right of association and new business entry: country-level evidence from the market sector," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1161-1177, October.
    6. Kuhn, Peter & Gu, Wulong, 1998. "Centralization and strikes," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 243-265, September.
    7. Goerke, Laszlo & Neugart, Michael, 2017. "Social comparisons in oligopsony," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 196-209.
    8. Goerke, Laszlo & Hillesheim, Inga, 2013. "Relative consumption, working time, and trade unions," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 170-179.
    9. Ehrich, Malte & Munasib, Abdul & Roy, Devesh, 2018. "The Hartz reforms and the German labor force," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 284-300.
    10. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2007. "Comparison Wage in Trade Union Decision Making," MPRA Paper 46287, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Matthias Strifler & Thomas Beissinger, 2016. "Fairness Considerations in Labor Union Wage Setting – A Theoretical Analysis," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 63(3), pages 303-330, July.
    12. Alaka Shree Prasad & Biswajit Mandal, 2019. "Time zone difference, skill formation and corrupt informal sector: the role of virtual trade," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 261-290, December.
    13. Mariam Camarero & Gaetano D’Adamo & Cecilio Tamarit, 2014. "The role of Institutions in explaining wage determination in the Euro Area: a panel cointegration approach," Working Papers 2014/15, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    14. Coenen, Michael & Haucap, Justus, 2013. "Kommunal- statt Missbrauchsaufsicht: Zur Aufsicht über Trinkwasserentgelte nach der 8. GWB-Novelle," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 53, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    15. Mulder, C B, 1993. "Wage-Moderating Effects of Corporatism: Decentralized versus Centralized Wage Setting in a Union, Firm, Government Context," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 61(3), pages 287-301, September.
    16. Guido Ascari & Christian Merkl, 2009. "Real Wage Rigidities and the Cost of Disinflations," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2-3), pages 417-435, March.
    17. Marcus Dittrich, 2010. "Welfare Effects of Local versus Central Wage Bargaining," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 24(1), pages 26-34, March.
    18. Kåre Johansen, "undated". "Nonlinear Wage Responses to Internal and External Factors," Working Paper Series 0902, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, revised 25 Aug 2002.
    19. Calmfors, Lars, 1985. "Work sharing, employment and wages," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 293-309.
    20. Frank Scharr, 2005. "Tarifbindung, Rententeilung und Konzessionsverträge als Einflussgrößen der Lohnhöhe in Unternehmen : eine Untersuchung mit Mikrodaten für thüringische Firmen," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 39.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gewerkschaften; Streiks; Strikes; Unions;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iwkpps:12015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkolde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.