IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse23/278115.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Content Genre, Audience Share, and Presence of Public Sector Broadcasters in an Era of Overflowing OTT Services

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Sungwook
  • Kwon, Youngsun

Abstract

Various types of broadcasters have been created due to the progress of broadcasting technology, and recently, global OTT services have threatened the raison d'être of PSBs. PSB opponents, based on neo-classical economics, argue that the government's support for PSB hurts fair competition and distorts the market. In contrast, PSB proponents, based on neo-Keynesian economics, say that PSBs still need to provide citizens with quality programs for correcting market failures. This study found that several PSB channels broadcast entertainment much more than other genres in line with global OTT platforms except BBC One and Rai 1, and that the more PSB channels broadcast entertainment (quality programs), the higher (lower) annual audience share of channels. This could contribute to improving the management performance of PSBs. However, if the social agreement is reached that audience share is not the ultimate goal, it would be desirable for PSBs to consistently supply traditional quality content to citizens to prevent market failures.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Sungwook & Kwon, Youngsun, 2023. "The Content Genre, Audience Share, and Presence of Public Sector Broadcasters in an Era of Overflowing OTT Services," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 278115, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse23:278115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/278115/1/Park-Kwon.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon P. Anderson & Øystein Foros & Hans Jarle Kind, 2018. "Competition for Advertisers and for Viewers in Media Markets," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(608), pages 34-54, February.
    2. Kim, Min Sung & Kim, Eun & Hwang, ShinYoung & Kim, Junghwan & Kim, Seongcheol, 2017. "Willingness to pay for over-the-top services in China and Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 197-207.
    3. Simon P. Anderson & Øystein Foros & Hans Jarle Kind, 2018. "Competition for Advertisers and for Viewers in Media Markets," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(608), pages 34-54, February.
    4. Jung, Juan & Melguizo, Ángel, 2023. "Is your netflix a substitute for your telefunken? Evidence on the dynamics of traditional pay TV and OTT in Latin America," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Affeldt, P. & Argentesi, E. & Filistrucchi, Lapo, 2021. "Estimating Demand with Multi-Homing in Two-Sided Markets," Other publications TiSEM 1317bf39-d02e-4f61-a34f-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Simon P. Anderson & Øystein Foros & Hans Jarle Kind, 2019. "The importance of consumer multihoming (joint purchases) for market performance: Mergers and entry in media markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 125-137, January.
    3. Kawaguchi, Kohei & Kuroda, Toshifumi & Sato, Susumu, 2023. "Relevant markets and market power of mobile apps," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Anderson, Simon P. & Peitz, Martin, 2020. "Media see-saws: Winners and losers in platform markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2019. "A theory of multihoming in rideshare competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 89-96, January.
    6. Gary Biglaiser & Emilio Calvano & Jacques Crémer, 2019. "Incumbency advantage and its value," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 41-48, January.
    7. Simon P. Anderson & Martin Peitz, 2023. "Ad Clutter, Time Use, and Media Diversity," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 227-270, May.
    8. Argentesi, Elena & Buccirossi, Paolo & Calvano, Emilio & Duso, Tomaso & Marrazzo, Alessia & Nava, Salvatore, 2021. "Merger Policy in Digital Markets: An Ex Post Assessment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 95-140.
    9. Pavan, Alessandro & Jullien, Bruno & Rysman, Marc, 2021. "Two-sided Markets, Pricing, and Network Effects," CEPR Discussion Papers 16480, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Evensen, Charlotte Bjørnhaug & Haugen, Atle, 2021. "The impact of targeting technologies and consumer multi-homing on digital platform competition," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 13/2021, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    11. Wu, Jie & Li, Yunbing & Dong, Yu & Zha, Yong, 2023. "Sponsored data: A game-theoretic model with consumer multihoming behaviour," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 731-744.
    12. Dyskeland, Ole Kristian & Foros, Øystein, 2023. "Multihoming and market expansion: Effects on media platforms’ pricing and content creation incentives," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Kyeonggook Francis Park & Robert Seamans & Feng Zhu, 2021. "Homing and platform responses to entry: Historical evidence from the U.S. newspaper industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 684-709, April.
    14. Dooruj Rambaccussing & Andrzej Kwiatkowski, 2024. "The nexus between national and regional reporting of economic news: Evidence from the United Kingdom and Scotland," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 371-393, April.
    15. Peitz, Martin, 2020. "Economic policy for digital attention intermediaries," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-035, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Shekhar, Shiva, 2020. "Zero Pricing Platform Competition," MPRA Paper 99364, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Thomas D. Jeitschko & Mark J. Tremblay, 2020. "Platform Competition With Endogenous Homing," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(3), pages 1281-1305, August.
    18. Martin Peitz, 2024. "The Economic Theory of Two-Sided Platforms," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_584, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    19. Gang Liu & Fengyue An, 2021. "Video Platforms’ Value-Added Service Investments and Pricing Strategies for Advertisers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Calvano, Emilio & Polo, Michele, 2021. "Market power, competition and innovation in digital markets: A survey," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    content; genre; quality program; audience share; social responsibility; PSB; OTT;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse23:278115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.