IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse22/265647.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International Variation in Regulations Related to Initial Coin Offerings: Preliminary Findings and A Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Kshetri, Nir

Abstract

As prior researchers have suggested a firm's success in an international market depends on how well its strategy fits with the nonmarket environment such as formal institutions. This paper examines the determinants of formal institutions around new areas of economic activities. Specifically, we propose a framework for understanding how the quality of formal institutions to promote entrepreneurship drives the focus of such institutions with respect to initial coin offering (ICO), which is emerging as a popular fundraising method. The paper also analyzes how nonmarket factors such as a jurisdiction's tax haven nature, regulators' perceptions of ICOs as threats to national or political interests and trade and industry associations might moderate the relations between quality of institutions and the focus of such institutions with respect to ICOs. We utilize inductive analysis. A key finding of this study is that an economy's quality of entrepreneurship-related institutions, perceived threats to national/political interests and tax haven nature lead to different policy orientations. Consequently, regulators assign different importance to promote crypto-entrepreneurship and to deal with associated risks. Regulators with main focus on promoting crypto-ventures have taken measures to enrich blockchain ecosystem and provided tax and non-tax incentives to attract such ventures. Regulators with main focus on dealing with risks of crypto-ventures are relying on regulatory sandbox and close regulatory monitoring of such ventures.

Suggested Citation

  • Kshetri, Nir, 2022. "International Variation in Regulations Related to Initial Coin Offerings: Preliminary Findings and A Research Agenda," 31st European Regional ITS Conference, Gothenburg 2022: Reining in Digital Platforms? Challenging monopolies, promoting competition and developing regulatory regimes 265647, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse22:265647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/265647/1/Kshetri-ICO.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoltan Acs & László Szerb & Erkko Autio, 2017. "The Global Entrepreneurship Index," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2016, chapter 0, pages 19-38, Springer.
    2. Da Rin, Marco & Nicodano, Giovanna & Sembenelli, Alessandro, 2006. "Public policy and the creation of active venture capital markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(8-9), pages 1699-1723, September.
    3. Volden, Craig & Ting, Michael M. & Carpenter, Daniel P., 2008. "A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 102(3), pages 319-332, August.
    4. Grilli, Luca & Murtinu, Samuele, 2018. "Selective subsidies, entrepreneurial founders' human capital, and access to R&D alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1945-1963.
    5. Zoltán J. Ács & László Szerb & Esteban Lafuente & Ainsley Lloyd, 2018. "The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018, chapter 0, pages 21-37, Springer.
    6. David M. Konisky, 2007. "Regulatory Competition and Environmental Enforcement: Is There a Race to the Bottom?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 853-872, October.
    7. Ben Spigel, 2017. "The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 49-72, January.
    8. John Croenewegen & Marianne van der Steen, 2007. "The Evolutionary Policy Maker," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 351-358, June.
    9. Luca Grilli & Samuele Murtinu, 2015. "New technology-based firms in Europe: market penetration, public venture capital, and timing of investment," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(5), pages 1109-1148.
    10. Zoltan J. Acs & László Szerb & Erkko Autio, 2015. "Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2014," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-14932-5, October.
    11. Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari & Raghu Garud & Arun Kumaraswamy, 2016. "The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1829-1853, September.
    12. Back, Yujin & Praveen Parboteeah, K. & Nam, Dae-il, 2014. "Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Management Consulting Firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 390-405.
    13. Kshetri, Nir, 2015. "Success of Crowd-based Online Technology in Fundraising: An Institutional Perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 100-116.
    14. John P. Conley, 2017. "Blockchain and the Economics of Crypto-tokens and Initial Coin Offerings," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 17-00008, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    15. Jones, Chris & Temouri, Yama, 2016. "The determinants of tax haven FDI," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 237-250.
    16. Jihad Dagher, 2018. "Regulatory Cycles: Revisiting the Political Economy of Financial Crises," IMF Working Papers 2018/008, International Monetary Fund.
    17. Baumol, William J., 1996. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 3-22, January.
    18. Meuleman, Miguel & De Maeseneire, Wouter, 2012. "Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external financing?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 580-591.
    19. Grilli, Luca & Murtinu, Samuele, 2014. "Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1523-1543.
    20. Frederik von Briel & Per Davidsson & Jan Recker, 2018. "Digital Technologies as External Enablers of New Venture Creation in the IT Hardware Sector," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 47-69, January.
    21. Da Rin, Marco & Nicodano, Giovanna & Sembenelli, Alessandro, 2006. "Public policy and the creation of active venture capital markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(8-9), pages 1699-1723, September.
    22. Farouk El-Kharouf & Sulayman Al-Qudsi & Shifa Obeid, 2010. "The Gulf Corporation Council Sovereign Wealth Funds: Are They Instruments for Economic Diversification or Political Tools?," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 9(1), pages 124-151, Winter/Sp.
    23. Zoltan J. Acs & László Szerb & Erkko Autio, 2016. "Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2015," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, edition 1, number 978-3-319-26730-2, October.
    24. Zoltan Acs & László Szerb & Erkko Autio, 2017. "Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2016," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, number 978-3-319-63844-7, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nir Kshetri, 2023. "The nature and sources of international variation in formal institutions related to initial coin offerings: preliminary findings and a research agenda," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-38, December.
    2. Guerini, Massimiliano & Quas, Anita, 2016. "Governmental venture capital in Europe: Screening and certification," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 175-195.
    3. Dorine Cornet & Jean Bonnet & Sébastien Bourdin, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurship indicator (DEI): an analysis of the case of the greater Paris metropolitan area," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(3), pages 697-724, December.
    4. Adisu Fanta Bate, 2021. "A comparative analysis on the entrepreneurial ecosystem of BRICS club countries: practical emphasis on South Africa," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Mohamed Abouelhassan Ali & Moaaz Kabil & Rahaf Alayan & Róbert Magda & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Performance in Egypt: An Empirical Study Based on the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Antonia Nörthemann, 2023. "Industry-specific specialization in venture capitalists’ internationalization decisions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(5), pages 891-927, July.
    7. Ivana Đaković Radojičić & Jelena Raut & Slavica Mitrović Veljković & Branislav Dudić & Silvia Treľová & Vijoleta Vrhovac, 2022. "Factors That Limit the Development of the Digital Entrepreneurial System in the Scale-Up Phase of the Enterprise Life Cycle," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Mark Sanders, 2022. "Enter the Prince of Denmark: Entrepreneurship for a Resilient and Sustainable Economy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 773-779, October.
    9. Xaver Neumeyer & Susana C. Santos & Michael H. Morris, 2019. "Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 462-484, April.
    10. Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson, 2019. "The collaborative innovation bloc: A new mission for Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 295-320, December.
    11. Zoltan J. Acs & Saul Estrin & Tomasz Mickiewicz & László Szerb, 2018. "Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 501-514, August.
    12. Thorsten Lammers & Dilek Cetindamar & Maren Borkert, 2021. "A Digital Tale of Two Cities—Observing the Dynamics of the Artificial Intelligence Ecosystems in Berlin and Sydney," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Charalampos Michael Vlados & Nikolaos Deniozos & Demosthenes Chatzinikolaou, 2018. "Towards A New Approach of Local Development under Crisis Conditions: Empowering the Local Business Ecosystems in Greece, by Adopting a New Local Development Policy," International Journal of Regional Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 5(1), pages 1-1, December.
    14. Mabel Pisá-Bó & José Fernando López-Muñoz & Josefina Novejarque-Civera, 2021. "The ever-changing socioeconomic conditions for entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1335-1355, September.
    15. Franz Huber & Alan Ponce & Francesco Rentocchini & Thomas Wainwright, 2020. "The Wealth of (Open Data) Nations? Examining the interplay of open government data and country-level institutions for entrepreneurial activity at the country-level," SEEDS Working Papers 1120, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Nov 2020.
    16. Colombelli, Alessandra & Krafft, Jackie & Vivarelli, Marco, 2016. "New Firms and Post-Entry Performance: The Role of Innovation," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201602, University of Turin.
    17. Ionela DUMITRU & Ionut DUMITRU, 2017. "Entrepreneurship Determinants in Central and Eastern Europe. The Case of Romania," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(1), pages 187-203.
    18. Mina Baliamoune-Lutz & Pierre Garello, 2014. "Tax structure and entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 165-190, January.
    19. Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes & García Martínez, Marian, 2023. "Entrepreneurial innovativeness: When too little or too much agglomeration hurts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    20. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Marco Vivarelli, 2016. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation: New Entries, Survival, Growth," GREDEG Working Papers 2016-04, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    blockchain; crypto-currencies; crypto-ventures; initial coin offerings; regulatory sandboxes; tax havens;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse22:265647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.