IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse15/127176.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Application of Actor-Network Theory to Network Neutrality in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Shin, Dong-Hee
  • Kim, Hyup (Henry)
  • Kim, Nam Cheol
  • Kim, So Jeong
  • Kim, Sungho
  • Kim, Guri

Abstract

This research analyzes the debate surrounding the network neutrality in Korea through the lens of Actor-Network Theory (ANT), trying to map the socio-technical network formed around the network neutrality controversy. We intend to reassemble the heterogeneous elements involved in this network and analyze its structure, identifying, describing and characterizing the different positions of the actors involved in the public debate. This paper seeks to demonstrate some of the contradictions in this process and discuss the importance of ANT concepts in the research. Our data is essentially documental, composed of laws, bills, reports and official records of public debates about the net neutrality, including video recordings of seminars and public audiences promoted by the Korean National Assembly. It can be inferred that public debate about network neutrality has been revealing acute internal contradictions between interests groups, placing actors from different levels of this network in disputes which involve a constant rearrangement of positions. The findings in this study suggest that the issue is not only complicated because it is embedded contextually, but also because the respective parties’ diverse interests are multifaceted and vague. It is concluded, therefore, that a coherent and consistent approach is an effective way to govern neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin, Dong-Hee & Kim, Hyup (Henry) & Kim, Nam Cheol & Kim, So Jeong & Kim, Sungho & Kim, Guri, 2015. "Application of Actor-Network Theory to Network Neutrality in Korea," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127176, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse15:127176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/127176/1/Shin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Minjeong & Chung, Chung Joo & Kim, Jang Hyun, 2011. "Who shapes network neutrality policy debate? An examination of information subsidizers in the mainstream media and at Congressional and FCC hearings," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 314-324, May.
    2. Dong‐Hee Shin & Hyungseung Choo, 2011. "Demystifying Internet Neutrality in South Korea with Stakeholder Analysis," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 28(6), pages 557-583, November.
    3. Nicholas Economides & Benjamin E. Hermalin, 2012. "The economics of network neutrality," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(4), pages 602-629, December.
    4. Frieden, Rob, 2005. "Lessons from broadband development in Canada, Japan, Korea and the United States," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 595-613, September.
    5. Krämer, Jan & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Weinhardt, Christof, 2013. "Net neutrality: A progress report," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 794-813.
    6. Jay Pil Choi & Byung‐Cheol Kim, 2010. "Net neutrality and investment incentives," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(3), pages 446-471, September.
    7. Shin, Dong-Hee & Lee, Jaegil & Kim, Nam Cheol & Jung, Jaeyoel, 2014. "Network neutrality: Insights gained by juxtaposing the US and Korea," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106865, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Edmond Baranes, 2014. "The interplay between network investment and content quality: Implications to net neutrality on the Internet," Post-Print hal-01830012, HAL.
    9. Caves, Kevin W., 2012. "Modeling the welfare effects of net neutrality regulation: A Comment on Economides and Tåg," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 288-292.
    10. Shin, Dong-Hee & Jung, Jaemin, 2012. "Socio-technical analysis of Korea's broadband convergence network: Big plans, big projects, big prospects?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 579-593.
    11. Crocioni, Pietro, 2011. "Net Neutrality in Europe: Desperately seeking a market failure," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-11, February.
    12. Baranes, Edmond, 2014. "The interplay between network investment and content quality: Implications to net neutrality on the Internet," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 57-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna D'Annunzio & Pierfrancesco Reverberi, 2015. "Content providers and co-investment in broadband networks," DIAG Technical Reports 2015-05, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    2. Shin, Dong-Hee & Lee, Jaegil & Kim, Nam Cheol & Jung, Jaeyoel, 2014. "Network neutrality: Insights gained by juxtaposing the US and Korea," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106865, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Shin, Donghee & Kim, Namchul & Yoon, Hongsuk & Jeong, Jaeyeol & Lee, Jaegil, 2014. "A comparative case study of regulatory approaches in the US and Korea," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101408, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Potgieter, Petrus H., 2014. "Alternatives to network neutrality: A South African perspective," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106880, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Jitsuzumi, Toshiya, 2024. "Model analysis on the economic impact of paid peering: Implications of the Netflix vs. SK broadband dispute," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).
    6. D'Annunzio, Anna & Russo, Antonio, 2015. "Net Neutrality and internet fragmentation: The role of online advertising," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 30-47.
    7. Axel Gautier & Jean-Christophe Poudou & Michel Roland, 2024. "Net Neutrality and Universal Service Obligations: It’s All About Bandwidth," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 64(4), pages 581-614, June.
    8. Robb, Genna & Hawthorne, Ryan, 2019. "Net neutrality and market power: The case of South Africa," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9).
    9. Broos, Sébastien & Gautier, Axel, 2017. "The exclusion of competing one-way essential complements: Implications for net neutrality," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 358-392.
    10. Gautier, Axel & Somogyi, Robert, 2020. "Prioritization vs zero-rating: Discrimination on the internet," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Vogelsang Ingo, 2013. "The Endgame of Telecommunications Policy? A Survey," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 193-270, December.
    12. Calzada, Joan & Tselekounis, Markos, 2018. "Net Neutrality in a hyperlinked Internet economy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 190-221.
    13. Bauner, Christoph & Espin, Augusto, 2023. "Do subscribers of mobile networks care about Data Throttling?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    14. D׳Annunzio, Anna & Reverberi, Pierfrancesco, 2016. "Co-investment in ultra-fast broadband access networks: Is there a role for content providers?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 353-367.
    15. Bauer, Johannes M. & Knieps, Günter, 2018. "Complementary innovation and network neutrality," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 172-183.
    16. José Francisco Tudón Maldonado, 2017. "Congestion v Content Provision in Net Neutrality: The Case of Amazon's Twitch.tv," 2017 Papers ptu168, Job Market Papers.
    17. Antonio Russo & Anna D'Annunzio, 2013. "Network Neutrality, Access to Content and Online Advertising," KOF Working papers 13-344, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    18. Nielsen, Martin, 2015. "Strategic Investment Dependence and Net Neutrality," Discussion Papers on Economics 11/2015, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    19. Robert F. Easley & Hong Guo & Jan Krämer, 2018. "Research Commentary—From Net Neutrality to Data Neutrality: A Techno-Economic Framework and Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 253-272, June.
    20. Sahar Fekih Romdhane & Chokri Aloui & Khaïreddine Jebsi, 2020. "On the Net Neutrality Efficiency under Congestion Price Discrimination," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 833-872, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Network neutrality; platform neutrality; actor network theory; South Korea;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse15:127176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.