IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itsb14/106865.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Network neutrality: Insights gained by juxtaposing the US and Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Shin, Dong-Hee
  • Lee, Jaegil
  • Kim, Nam Cheol
  • Jung, Jaeyoel

Abstract

In this study, we compare and contrast the U.S. and Korea in the context of network neutrality, focusing on debates among stakeholders and regulatory approaches. Interesting similarities and differences are highlighted by comparisons within the broadband ecosystem framework: government functions, histories, people's perceptions, regulatory approaches, legislative initiatives, and implementation. In Korea, there is an existing regulatory framework with suggestive guidelines that can be used to address net neutrality in a case-by-case fashion. The U.S. follows a regulatory approach by creating enforceable non-discrimination rules. Our findings suggest that the issue is not only complicated, but also as complex and vague as the parties' diverse interests are. We conclude that a careful combination of government coordination and market forces is an effective way to govern net neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin, Dong-Hee & Lee, Jaegil & Kim, Nam Cheol & Jung, Jaeyoel, 2014. "Network neutrality: Insights gained by juxtaposing the US and Korea," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106865, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itsb14:106865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/106865/1/816637997.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong‐Hee Shin & Hyungseung Choo, 2011. "Demystifying Internet Neutrality in South Korea with Stakeholder Analysis," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 28(6), pages 557-583, November.
    2. Jay Pil Choi & Byung‐Cheol Kim, 2010. "Net neutrality and investment incentives," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(3), pages 446-471, September.
    3. Krämer, Jan & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Weinhardt, Christof, 2013. "Net neutrality: A progress report," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 794-813.
    4. Shin, Dong-Hee & Jung, Jaemin, 2012. "Socio-technical analysis of Korea's broadband convergence network: Big plans, big projects, big prospects?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 579-593.
    5. Alison Powell & Alissa Cooper, 2011. "Net neutrality discourses: comparing advocacy and regulatory arguments in the United States and the United Kingdom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 39024, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shin, Dong-Hee & Kim, Hyup (Henry) & Kim, Nam Cheol & Kim, So Jeong & Kim, Sungho & Kim, Guri, 2015. "Application of Actor-Network Theory to Network Neutrality in Korea," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127176, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shin, Donghee & Kim, Namchul & Yoon, Hongsuk & Jeong, Jaeyeol & Lee, Jaegil, 2014. "A comparative case study of regulatory approaches in the US and Korea," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101408, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Shin, Dong-Hee & Kim, Hyup (Henry) & Kim, Nam Cheol & Kim, So Jeong & Kim, Sungho & Kim, Guri, 2015. "Application of Actor-Network Theory to Network Neutrality in Korea," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127176, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. D'Annunzio, Anna & Russo, Antonio, 2015. "Net Neutrality and internet fragmentation: The role of online advertising," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 30-47.
    4. Alexei A. Gaivoronski & Per Jonny Nesse & Olai Bendik Erdal, 2017. "Internet service provision and content services: paid peering and competition between internet providers," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 43-79, May.
    5. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Stocker, Volker & Stockhammer, Paul, 2019. "Ist Netzneutralität tatsächlich gut? Eine Neubewertung vor dem Hintergrund der Regulierung in den USA und in der EU sowie aktueller Forschungsergebnisse," Policy Notes 38, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Liu Xingyi, 2016. "Fear of Discrimination: Net Neutrality and Product Differentiation on the Internet," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 211-247, December.
    7. Axel Gautier & Jean-Christophe Poudou & Michel Roland, 2024. "Net Neutrality and Universal Service Obligations: It’s All About Bandwidth," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 64(4), pages 581-614, June.
    8. Bauer, Johannes M. & Bohlin, Erik, 2022. "Regulation and innovation in 5G markets," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    9. Shin, Dong-Hee & Lee, Min-Kyu, 2017. "Public value mapping of network neutrality: Public values and net neutrality in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 208-224.
    10. Lüth Hendrik, 2015. "Toll Road or Dumb Pipe? Economic Perspectives on Net Neutrality," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 66(3), pages 303-329, December.
    11. Broos, Sébastien & Gautier, Axel, 2017. "The exclusion of competing one-way essential complements: Implications for net neutrality," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 358-392.
    12. Justus Haucap & Torben Stühmeier, 2016. "Competition and antitrust in Internet markets," Chapters, in: Johannes M. Bauer & Michael Latzer (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, chapter 9, pages 183-210, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Neute, Nadine & Budzinski, Oliver, 2016. "Ökonomische Anmerkungen zur aktuellen Netzneutralitätspolitik in den USA," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 100, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    14. Marc Bourreau & Romain Lestage, 2019. "Net neutrality and asymmetric platform competition," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 140-171, April.
    15. Gautier, Axel & Somogyi, Robert, 2020. "Prioritization vs zero-rating: Discrimination on the internet," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Vogelsang Ingo, 2013. "The Endgame of Telecommunications Policy? A Survey," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 193-270, December.
    17. Calzada, Joan & Tselekounis, Markos, 2018. "Net Neutrality in a hyperlinked Internet economy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 190-221.
    18. Bauner, Christoph & Espin, Augusto, 2023. "Do subscribers of mobile networks care about Data Throttling?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    19. Bauer, Johannes M. & Knieps, Günter, 2018. "Complementary innovation and network neutrality," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 172-183.
    20. Potgieter, Petrus H., 2014. "Alternatives to network neutrality: A South African perspective," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106880, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Network neutrality; comparative case study; Korea; the U.S.; broadband; competition;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itsb14:106865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itsworld.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.