IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse14/101425.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Luxembourg a bastion of state ownership

Author

Listed:
  • Binsfeld, Nico
  • Whalley, Jason
  • Pugalis, Lee

Abstract

Akin to many other European Union member states, over recent times the Luxembourgish telecommunications market is undergoing a process of market liberalisation, which is itself encapsulated by broader neoliberal tendencies. While many aspects of market liberalisation are similar to those in other European Union member states, there are others that appear to be highly distinctive. The government has simultaneously sought to liberalise the small telecommunications market while protecting the wholly state owned incumbent. Moreover, the state has created or participated in the creation of new companies, thereby deepening its presence within the telecommunications market, although the incumbent operator remains the predominant player. As a result, competition and market penetration - especially by way of international investment - has been curtailed and alternative fixed operators have found it difficult to gain access to public infrastructures while being unable to build out their own network infrastructure. The current nature of the market raises four key questions that this paper will explore and seek to address. Firstly, how competitive (or 'open') is the marketplace? Secondly, how has the extensive presence of the state in the market shaped its development? Thirdly, will Luxembourg be able to maintain its current international ICT competitiveness in the short and medium term? Fourthly, why have international operators invested (or not) in a market as small as Luxembourg? To answer these questions, we construct an extensive and detailed timeline of political, technological, regulatory and competitive developments within the Luxembourgish market. Contrary to prevailing international trends displaying the hegemony of neoliberalism, we reveal how the Luxembourgish telecommunications sector has benefitted from the deepening of state involvement over time. This leads us to conclude that Luxembourg is indeed a bastion of state ownership, as the government has not followed other European countries to reduce both its ownership and intervention in the telecommunications market.

Suggested Citation

  • Binsfeld, Nico & Whalley, Jason & Pugalis, Lee, 2014. "Luxembourg a bastion of state ownership," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101425, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse14:101425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/101425/1/794193714.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grajek, Michal, 2010. "Estimating network effects and compatibility: Evidence from the Polish mobile market," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 130-143, May.
    2. Bauer, Johannes M., 0. "Regulation, public policy, and investment in communications infrastructure," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-2), pages 65-79, February.
    3. Arnaud Bourgain & Patrice Pieretti & Jens Høj, 2009. "Can the Financial Sector continue to be the Main Growth Engine in Luxembourg?," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 660, OECD Publishing.
    4. Shane Greenstein & Ryan McDevitt, 2012. "Measuring the Broadband Bonus in Thirty OECD Countries," OECD Digital Economy Papers 197, OECD Publishing.
    5. Martin Fransman, 2004. "The telecoms boom and bust 1996-2003 and the role of financial markets," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 369-406, October.
    6. Bortolotti, Bernardo & D'Souza, Juliet & Fantini, Marcella & Megginson, William L., 0. "Privatization and the sources of performance improvement in the global telecommunications industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(5-6), pages 243-268, June.
    7. Rood, Hendrik & te Velde, R. A., 0. "Investment strategies in the Netherlands," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(10-11), pages 701-715, November.
    8. Symeou, Pavlos C., 0. "Does smallness affect the liberalisation of telecommunications? The case of Cyprus," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3-4), pages 215-229, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Binsfeld, Nico & Whalley, Jason & Pugalis, Lee, 2017. "An analysis of the structure, actors and interrelationships producing Luxembourg's ICT ecosystem," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169450, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Binsfeld, Nico & Whalley, Jason, 2019. "Innovation ecosystems in small countries – The case of Luxembourg," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205170, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bauer, Johannes M. & Shim, Woohyun, 2012. "Regulation and digital innovation: Theory and evidence," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 60364, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Binsfeld, Nico & Whalley, Jason & Pugalis, Lee, 2016. "Competing against yourself: State duopoly in the Luxembourg telecommunications industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 791-803.
    3. Binsfeld, Nico & Whalley, Jason & Pugalis, Lee, 2017. "An analysis of the structure, actors and interrelationships producing Luxembourg's ICT ecosystem," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169450, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Binsfeld, Nico & Pugalis, Lee & Whalley, Jason, 2015. "ICT ecosystems in small countries: an analysis of Luxembourg," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127127, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Garrone, Paola & Zaccagnino, Michele, 2015. "Seeking the links between competition and telecommunications investments," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 388-405.
    6. Carlo Cambini & Yossi Spiegel, 2016. "Investment and Capital Structure of Partially Private Regulated Firms," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 487-515, April.
    7. Riham Ahmed Ezzat, 2015. "Paving the way for better telecom performance: Evidence from the telecommunication sector in MENA countries," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01164199, HAL.
    8. Mohammed Ali Ahmed Al-Sharafi & Shu Tong & Abdullah Aloqab, 2021. "The Effective Role of Internal Factors on Reconstructing Telecom Companies: The Case of Yemen Telecom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Jackie Krafft & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2008. "Corporate Governance in Advanced Economies: Lessons in a Post Financial Crash Era.. Introduction to the Special Issue," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 74(4), pages 419-424.
    10. Derya Fındık & Aysıt Tansel, 2013. "Intangible investment and Technical efficiency: The case of software-intensive manufacturing firms in Turkey," EY International Congress on Economics I (EYC2013), October 24-25, 2013, Ankara, Turkey 235, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association.
    11. Fabian Queder, 2020. "Towards a vertically separated broadband infrastructure: The potential role of voluntary separation," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 21(2), pages 143-165, June.
    12. Navio-Marco, J & Solorzano-Garcia, M & Urueña, A., 2015. "Language As Key Factor Of Long-Term Value Creation In Mergers And Acquisitions In The Telecommunications Sector," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127170, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    13. Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu, 2017. "The optimal choice of internal decision-making structures in a network industry," Discussion Paper Series 166, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Sep 2017.
    14. Lechman, Ewa, 2014. "The ‘technological take-off’ and the 'critical mass'. A trial conceptualization," MPRA Paper 59506, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Krancke, Jan & Vidal, Miguel & Fier, Andreas, 2012. "Changing the rules: Applying a more economic approach to dynamic telecom markets," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 66976, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    16. Navío-Marco, Julio & Solórzano-García, Marta & Matilla-García, Mariano & Urueña, Alberto, 2016. "Language as a key factor of long-term value creation in mergers and acquisitions in the telecommunications sector," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1052-1063.
    17. Karamti, Chiraz, 2019. "Lopsided effects of telecom reforms on mobile markets in the enlarged EU: Evidence from dynamic quantile model," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 238-261.
    18. I. Atiyas & P. Dogan, "undated". "Glass Half Empty? Politics and Institutions in the Liberalization of the Fixed Line Telecommunications in Turkey," Working Paper 33655, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    19. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier Paolo Saviotti, 2014. "The Dynamics of Knowledge-intensive Sectors' Knowledge Base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 215-242, April.
    20. Brzić, Barbara & Dabić, Marina & Kukura, Frane & Podobnik, Boris, 2021. "The effects of corruption and the fraction of private ownership on the productivity of telecommunication companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse14:101425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.