IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itsb18/190356.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effects of O2O Service Factors on Sequel Service Adoption: O2O Service Quality Dimensions and Perceived Fit

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Dayoung
  • Kim, Seongcheol

Abstract

As the mobile-based O2O industry grows, many existing O2O service providers are attempting to expand their businesses by service diversification. According to this trend, the current study investigated the effects of the parent O2O service-related factors on the user adoption of a sequel service. Specifically, a total of ten dimensions encompassing the whole service delivery process that flows from a convenient mobile app to an offline area were identified. Another factor that this study considered is users' fit perception between the parent and the sequel O2O service. To empirically test the conceptual model, this study carried out analyses for two different types of service: a food delivery (Case 1) and taxi-hailing O2O service (Case 2). The findings were drawn from a total of 444 South Korean respondents who have experience with using the parent O2O services but not with the sequel services. Results found that, for Case 1, informativeness and security of online service quality, and reliability and empathy of offline service quality were significant antecedents of satisfaction with the O2O service. For Case 2, efficiency of online service quality, ubiquity of O2O-specific service quality, and empathy were found to significantly affect O2O satisfaction. Results of both cases showed that perceived fit was a significant antecedent of intention to use a sequel service when attitude toward a service extension mediated. O2O satisfaction was found to be a crucial element influencing both O2O loyalty and intention to use a sequel service.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Dayoung & Kim, Seongcheol, 2018. "The Effects of O2O Service Factors on Sequel Service Adoption: O2O Service Quality Dimensions and Perceived Fit," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190356, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itsb18:190356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/190356/1/B3_3_Kang-and-Kim.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhat, Sobodh & Reddy, Srinivas K., 2001. "The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 111-122, September.
    2. Kim, Jiyoung & Jin, Byoungho & Swinney, Jane L., 2009. "The role of etail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in online loyalty development process," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 239-247.
    3. van Riel, A.C.R. & Liljander, V.M. & Lemmink, J.G.A.M. & Streukens, A.C.P., 2003. "Boost customer loyalty with online support: the case of mobile telecoms providers," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    4. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. "Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    5. Gefen, David, 2000. "E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 725-737, December.
    6. Batra, Rajeev & Stayman, Douglas M, 1990. "The Role of Mood in Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(2), pages 203-214, September.
    7. Dan J. Kim & Yujong Hwang, 2012. "A study of mobile internet user’s service quality perceptions from a user’s utilitarian and hedonic value tendency perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 409-421, April.
    8. Sandor Czellar, 2003. "Consumer attitude toward brand extensions : An Integrative Model and Research Propositions," Post-Print hal-00480357, HAL.
    9. Tojib, Dewi & Tsarenko, Yelena, 2012. "Post-adoption modeling of advanced mobile service use," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 922-928.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryu, Min Ho & Kim, Eunhye & Lee, Sang Yup, 2022. "How offline retailers adopt O2O: Neighboring star shops and their proximity effect," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pina, José M. & Dall'Olmo Riley, Francesca & Lomax, Wendy, 2013. "Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: A meta-analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1411-1419.
    2. Chung-Yu Wang & Li-Wei Wu & Chen-Yu Lin & Ruei-Jie Chen, 2017. "Purchase Intention toward the Extension and Parent Brand: The Role of Brand Commitment," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 83-103, February.
    3. Gierl, Heribert & Huettl, Verena, 2011. "A closer look at similarity: The effects of perceived similarity and conjunctive cues on brand extension evaluation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 120-133.
    4. Jiayu Qian & Jee-Sun Park, 2021. "Influencer-brand fit and brand dilution in China’s luxury market: the moderating role of self-concept clarity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 199-220, March.
    5. Martínez, Eva & Montaner, Teresa & Pina, José M., 2009. "Brand extension feedback: The role of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 305-313, March.
    6. Pourazad, Naser & Stocchi, Lara & Pare, Vipul, 2019. "Brand attribute associations, emotional consumer-brand relationship and evaluation of brand extensions," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 249-260.
    7. Martínez Salinas, Eva & Pina Pérez, José Miguel, 2009. "Modeling the brand extensions' influence on brand image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 50-60, January.
    8. Ingrid Moons & Patrick De Pelsmacker, 2015. "Self-Brand Personality Differences and Attitudes towards Electric Cars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Youngseon Kim & Nikki Wingate, 2017. "Narrow, powerful, and public: the influence of brand breadth in the luxury market," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(5), pages 453-466, October.
    10. Cao, Lanlan & Manthiou, Aikaterini & Ayadi, Kafia, 2022. "Extension and customer reaction on sharing economy platforms: The role of customer inertia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 513-522.
    11. Moon, Hakil & Sprott, David E., 2016. "Ingredient branding for a luxury brand: The role of brand and product fit," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5768-5774.
    12. Hwang, ShinYoung & Kim Seongcheol, 2017. "What triggers the use of mIM service provider’s sequel O2O service extensions?," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168494, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    13. Chetan A. Jhaveri & Jitendra M. Nenavani, 2020. "Evaluation of eTail Services Quality: AHP Approach," Vision, , vol. 24(3), pages 310-319, September.
    14. Yasir Ali Soomro & Muzzaffar Ali Issani & Shahzad Nasim, 2016. "Consumer Perceived Brand Concept & Close Brand Extension: A Multi-Mediation Model Analysis," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 12(1), pages 347-359.
    15. Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2010. "Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1237-1244, November.
    16. Özge Sýðýrcý & A. Müge Yalçýn, 2010. "Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations Of Brand Extensions," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 67-90.
    17. Christophe Bezes, 2010. "Tout ce qui est congruent, est-il similaire ? Propositions de définition du concept de congruence en marketing," Post-Print hal-00573441, HAL.
    18. E. Bacchiega & M. Colucci & M. Magnani, 2019. "What goes around, comes around: Reciprocal effects and double-sided moral hazard in the choice of brand licensing," Working Papers wp1136, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    19. Dwivedi, Abhishek & Merrilees, Bill, 2013. "Retail brand extensions: Unpacking the link between brand extension attitude and change in parent brand equity," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 75-84.
    20. Hsin-Hui Lin & Hsien-Ta Li & Yi-Shun Wang & Timmy H. Tseng & Ya-Ling Kao & Min-Yi Wu, 2017. "Predicting customer lifetime value for hypermarket private label products," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 619-635, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itsb18:190356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itsworld.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.