IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkpb/132.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The US-China trade deal: How the EU and WTO lose from managed trade

Author

Listed:
  • Chowdhry, Sonali
  • Felbermayr, Gabriel

Abstract

The authors analyze the economic consequences of the Economic and Trade Agreement (ETA) between China and the USA, also referred to as the Phase-I Deal, which was signed on January 15, 2020. It is a highly asymmetric treaty which commits China to open its markets and to purchase large quantities of US products in order for the US to refrain from imposing additional punitive tariffs. It requires Chinese imports of certain US goods to increase by about 95 bn USD in 2021 relative to the 2017 baseline. The authors show that compared to a 2021 benchmark without a US-China trade war and without the ETA, the EU is likely to lose about 11 bn USD in exports to China. The largest negative effects for the EU are expected in aircraft, vehicles, industrial machinery, optical and medical machinery, pharmaceuticals, and agricultural goods. The country in the EU most strongly affected by the possible trade diversion effects is Germany. They conclude that the ETA is very unlikely to be compatible with WTO law, because it violates the most-favored-nations principle and fosters managed trade thus undermining the multilateral trading system.

Suggested Citation

  • Chowdhry, Sonali & Felbermayr, Gabriel, 2020. "The US-China trade deal: How the EU and WTO lose from managed trade," Kiel Policy Brief 132, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkpb:132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/213366/1/1688475486.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Funke & Adrian Wende, 2021. "The US-China Phase One Trade Deal: An Economic Analysis of the Managed Trade Agreement," CESifo Working Paper Series 8945, CESifo.
    2. Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2020. "COVID-19-Pandemie und internationaler Handel: Abschätzung der Entwicklung der österreichischen Warenexporte im Jahr 2020," WIFO Research Briefs 6, WIFO.
    3. Berend Diekmann & Michael Kilpper, 2022. "Zollkrieg und Handelsabkommen zwischen den USA und China [Four Years of Tariff War and Two Years of Phase-One Agreement Between the U. S. and China — Has it Worked for the U. S.?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(3), pages 204-209, March.
    4. Freund,Caroline & Maliszewska,Maryla & Mattoo,Aaditya & Ruta,Michele, 2020. "When Elephants Make Peace : The Impact of the China-U.S. Trade Agreement on Developing Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9173, The World Bank.
    5. Fritz Breuss, 2020. "Pro-Globalization via FTAs in Times of COVID-19," WIFO Working Papers 617, WIFO.
    6. World Bank, "undated". "World Bank East Asia and Pacific Economic Update, April 2020," World Bank Publications - Reports 33477, The World Bank Group.
    7. Chowdhry, Sonali & Felbermayr, Gabriel, 2020. "The US-China trade deal and its impact on China's key trading partners," Kiel Policy Brief 134, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. repec:zbw:bofitp:2022_001 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Holger Görg & Katrin Kamin, 2021. "Globalisierung trifft Geoökonomie," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(11), pages 854-857, November.
    10. Michael Funke & Adrian Wende, 2023. "The US–China Phase One trade deal: An economic analysis of the managed trade agreement," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 758-786, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    US-China relations; managed trade; trade diversion; multilateralism; Beziehungen USA-China; gelenkter Handel; Handelsumlenkung; Multilateralismus;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkpb:132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.