IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkdp/71.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ursachen des Geburtenrückgangs in ökonomischer Sicht: Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Ergebnisse unter Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Wander, Hilde

Abstract

Ausgehend von den Erkenntnissen der modernen ökonomischen Fruchtbarkeitstheorie wurden mit Hilfe der Regressionsanalyse einige wichtige Zusammenhänge zwischen der sozio-ökonomischen Entwicklung und dem Geburtentrend in der Bundesrepublik untersucht: Es ergab sich, daß der absolute Anstieg der Einkommen entgegen einer verbreiteten Annahme keine entscheidende Rolle für die Fruchtbarkeitsentwicklung gespielt hat. Vielmehr zeigte sich, daß die Geburtenhäufigkeit gut mit der relativen Einkommensposition korrespondiert — also mit dem Abstand der Durchschnittseinkommen junger Haushaltsvorstände gegenüber dem Durchschnittseinkommen von Vergleichshaushalten der Bezugsgruppen (Haushalte der Eltern und Haushalte mit einem fünf bis zehn Jahre älteren Haushaltsvorstand). Bei wenig veränderter sozialer Schichtung führten absolut steigende Realeinkommen bis zur Mitte der sechziger Jahre zu einem Anstieg der Geburtenraten. Danach verschlechterte sich die relative Einkommensposition junger Ehepaare trotz weiter zunehmender Realeinkommen ständig, und die Geburtenrate sank. Zugleich gewannen die Wertvorstellungen der Mittelklasse zunehmend an Gewicht. Das hierdurch geprägte Anspruchsniveau konnten junge Ehepaare in der Regel nur noch befriedigen, wenn die Frau mitarbeitete und die Kinderzahl klein blieb. Eine Bevölkerungspolitik, die einen Wiederanstieg der Geburtenrate zum Ziel hat, muß diesen Zusammenhängen Rechnung tragen. Sie wird versuchen müssen, die relative Einkommensposition zugunsten der jungen Ehepaare zu verändern. Sie wird aber vor allem durch ein Bündel wohlkoordinierter Maßnahmen dafür sorgen müssen, daß die Frauen ihre Aufgaben in der Familie und im Beruf besser miteinander verbinden können.

Suggested Citation

  • Wander, Hilde, 1980. "Ursachen des Geburtenrückgangs in ökonomischer Sicht: Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Ergebnisse unter Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland," Kiel Discussion Papers 71, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkdp:71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/47998/1/02379755X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Nerlove, 1974. "Household and Economy: Toward a New Theory of Population and Economic Growth," NBER Chapters, in: Marriage, Family, Human Capital, and Fertility, pages 200-221, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. N. Namboodiri, 1974. "Which couples at given parities expect to have additional births? An exercise in discriminant analysis," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 11(1), pages 45-56, February.
    3. De Tray, Dennis N, 1973. "Child Quality and the Demand for Children," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(2), pages 70-95, Part II, .
    4. Mustalish, A.C. & Eidsvold, G. & Novick, L.F., 1976. "Decentralization in the New York City Department of Health: Reorganization of a public health agency," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 66(12), pages 1149-1154.
    5. Dudley Kirk, 1960. "The Influence of Business Cycles on Marriage and Birth Rates," NBER Chapters, in: Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pages 241-260, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcel Fulop, 1977. "A Survey of the Literature on the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 21(1), pages 5-13, March.
    2. James Cramer, 1979. "Employment trends ofyoung mothers and the opportunity cost of babies in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 16(2), pages 177-197, May.
    3. Larry E. Jones & Michele Tertilt, 2006. "An Economic History of Fertility in the U.S.: 1826-1960," NBER Working Papers 12796, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Chal Park, 1976. "Lifetime probability of additional births by age and parity for American women, 1935–1968: A new measurement of period fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Pazner, Elisha A. & Razin, Assaf, 1980. "Competitive efficiency in an overlapping-generation model with endogenous population," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 249-258, April.
    6. Bernard Dumas, "undated". "Perishable Investment and Hysteresis in Capital Formation," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 44-88, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    7. Lombard, J. P. & Kassier, W. E., 1990. "Implementering Van Die Intervalbenadering By Die Bepaling Van Besluitnemers Se Houding Teenoor Risiko," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 29(4), December.
    8. Marcel Fulop, 1981. "A Dynamic Macroeconomic Model of Fertility Rate for the United States," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 25(1), pages 22-27, March.
    9. Robert A. Pollak, 2012. "Allocating Time: Individuals' Technologies, Household Technology, Perfect Substitutes, and Specialization," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 105-106, pages 75-97.
    10. Saleh, Abdullah A. & Havlicek, Joseph, Jr., 1975. "Household Solid Waste Associated With Food Consumption Activities," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Tadashi Yamada & Tetsuji Yamada, 1984. "Part-time Employment of Married Women and Fertility in Urban Japan," NBER Working Papers 1474, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Magali Recoules, 2011. "How can gender discrimination explain fertility behaviors and family-friendly policies?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00675601, HAL.
    13. Paul Cahu & Falilou Fall & Roland Pongou, 2014. "Beauty, Polygyny, and Fertility: Theory and Evidence," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14078, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    14. Anderson, Gordon & Leo, Teng Wah, 2013. "An empirical examination of matching theories: The one child policy, partner choice and matching intensity in urban China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 468-489.
    15. Rasheda Khanam, 2008. "Child labour and school attendance: evidence from Bangladesh," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(1/2), pages 77-98, January.
    16. Massimiliano Bratti, 2003. "Labour force participation and marital fertility of Italian women: The role of education," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 16(3), pages 525-554, August.
    17. Psacharopoulos, George & Tzannatos, Zafiris, 1992. "Latin American women's earnings and participation in the labor force," Policy Research Working Paper Series 856, The World Bank.
    18. Sági, Judit & Lentner, Csaba, 2020. "A magyar népességpolitikai intézkedések tényezői és várható hatásai [Factors and expected outcomes of pro-birth policy interventions]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 289-308.
    19. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2006. "Social science knowledge and induced institutional innovation: an institutional design perspective," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 249-272, December.
    20. Kelly M. Jones, 2015. "Contraceptive Supply and Fertility Outcomes: Evidence from Ghana," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(1), pages 31-69.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkdp:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.